Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2020

Open Access 01-11-2020 | Computer Aided Design | Original Article

Impression material accuracy for palatal orthodontic miniscrews

Authors: Dr. Natalie Schenz, Dr. Vincent Schwarz, Romed Hörmann, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Adriano G. Crismani

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigates the accuracy of abutment transfer with current impression materials and provides a concise overview, including other relevant factors, in order to enable clinicians to make an informed decision about the optimal impression for this treatment procedure.

Methods

In all, 96 impressions of a cadaver head with two orthodontic miniscrews in place were taken with four common impression materials by two observers and using two methods of application. After pouring with a standard type IV stone and abutment transfer, all models and the upper jaw (which had been separated from the head) were scanned in a standard model scanner (Zirkonzahn® [Zirkohnzahn GmbH, Gais, Italy] S600 ARTI) and evaluated using a computer-aided design (CAD) program (GOM-Inspect [Gesellschaft für optische Messtechnik m.b.H., Braunschweig, Germany]). The deviations were measured at six points per screw and statistically evaluated with SPSS® (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Optimal values were obtained with biphasic polyvinylsiloxane, while monophasic polyvinylsiloxane, alginate and polyether also resulted in acceptable accuracy. Observer experience showed no effect and the method of application had only a minor effect on accuracy.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, it seems that all impression materials are suitable for miniscrew abutment transfer, provided that methods of intraoral adaptation of the orthodontic appliance can be employed. If higher accuracy is needed or for clinicians with less experienced, a biphasic polyvinylsiloxane impression with the putty-wash technique should be used as this combination reduces setting time. The most cost-effective version, alginate, can be used if the consequences of greater deviations can be handled. Caution is advised with polyether if undercuts are present.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Al Mortadi N, Jones Q, Eggbeer D, Lewis J, Williams RJ (2015) Fabrication of a resin appliance with alloy components using digital technology without an analog impression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 148:862–867PubMed Al Mortadi N, Jones Q, Eggbeer D, Lewis J, Williams RJ (2015) Fabrication of a resin appliance with alloy components using digital technology without an analog impression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 148:862–867PubMed
2.
go back to reference Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wostmann B (2007) Dimensional accuracy of 2‑stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity. Int J Prosthodont 20:573–575PubMed Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wostmann B (2007) Dimensional accuracy of 2‑stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity. Int J Prosthodont 20:573–575PubMed
3.
go back to reference Balkenhol M, Haunschild S, Erbe C, Wöstmann B (2010) Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 103:288–294PubMed Balkenhol M, Haunschild S, Erbe C, Wöstmann B (2010) Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 103:288–294PubMed
4.
go back to reference Baumgaertel S (2014) Temporary skeletal anchorage devices: the case for miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:558–564PubMed Baumgaertel S (2014) Temporary skeletal anchorage devices: the case for miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:558–564PubMed
5.
go back to reference Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S (2005) Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:624–629PubMed Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S (2005) Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:624–629PubMed
6.
go back to reference Crismani AG, Bernhart T, Baier C, Bantleon HP, Kucher G (2002) Chair-side procedure for connecting transpalatal arches with palatal implants. Eur J Orthod 24:337–342PubMed Crismani AG, Bernhart T, Baier C, Bantleon HP, Kucher G (2002) Chair-side procedure for connecting transpalatal arches with palatal implants. Eur J Orthod 24:337–342PubMed
7.
go back to reference Crismani AG, Bernhart T, Bantleon HP, Cope JB (2005) Palatal implants: the Straumann Orthosystem. Semin Orthod 11:16–23 Crismani AG, Bernhart T, Bantleon HP, Cope JB (2005) Palatal implants: the Straumann Orthosystem. Semin Orthod 11:16–23
8.
go back to reference Crismani AG, Bernhart T, Bantleon HP, Kucher G (2005) An innovative adhesive procedure for connecting transpalatal arches with palatal implants. Eur J Orthod 27:226–230PubMed Crismani AG, Bernhart T, Bantleon HP, Kucher G (2005) An innovative adhesive procedure for connecting transpalatal arches with palatal implants. Eur J Orthod 27:226–230PubMed
9.
go back to reference Dalstra M, Melsen B (2009) From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 36:36–41PubMed Dalstra M, Melsen B (2009) From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 36:36–41PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ender A, Mehl A (2015) In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 46:9–17PubMed Ender A, Mehl A (2015) In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 46:9–17PubMed
11.
go back to reference Graf S, Vasudavan S, Wilmes B (2018) CAD-CAM design and 3‑dimensional printing of mini-implant retained orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 154:877–882PubMed Graf S, Vasudavan S, Wilmes B (2018) CAD-CAM design and 3‑dimensional printing of mini-implant retained orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 154:877–882PubMed
12.
go back to reference Harris PR (1994) Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science. Behav Sci 39:256–256CrossRef Harris PR (1994) Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science. Behav Sci 39:256–256CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Holst S, Blatz MB, Bergler M, Goellner M, Wichmann M (2007) Influence of impression material and time on the 3‑dimensional accuracy of implant impressions. Quintessence Int 38:67–73PubMed Holst S, Blatz MB, Bergler M, Goellner M, Wichmann M (2007) Influence of impression material and time on the 3‑dimensional accuracy of implant impressions. Quintessence Int 38:67–73PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kim SH, Lee SJ, Cho IS, Kim SK, Kim TW (2009) Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants. Angle Orthod 79:899–907CrossRef Kim SH, Lee SJ, Cho IS, Kim SK, Kim TW (2009) Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants. Angle Orthod 79:899–907CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lange S, Bender R (2007) Quantile, empirische Verteilungsfunktion und Box Plot. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 132:3–4CrossRef Lange S, Bender R (2007) Quantile, empirische Verteilungsfunktion und Box Plot. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 132:3–4CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lietz T (2007) Minischrauben – Aspekte zur Bewertung und Auswahl der verschiedenen Systeme. In: Ludwig B (ed) Mini-Implantate in der Kieferorthopädie. Innovative Verankerungskonzepte. Quintessenz, Berlin, pp 14–36 Lietz T (2007) Minischrauben – Aspekte zur Bewertung und Auswahl der verschiedenen Systeme. In: Ludwig B (ed) Mini-Implantate in der Kieferorthopädie. Innovative Verankerungskonzepte. Quintessenz, Berlin, pp 14–36
17.
go back to reference Ludwig B, Lietz T (2007) Einleitung. In: Ludwig B (ed) Mini-Implantate in der Kieferorthopädie. Innovative Verankerungskonzepte. Quintessenz, Berlin, pp 1–4 Ludwig B, Lietz T (2007) Einleitung. In: Ludwig B (ed) Mini-Implantate in der Kieferorthopädie. Innovative Verankerungskonzepte. Quintessenz, Berlin, pp 1–4
18.
go back to reference McCabe J, Walls A (2009) Elastic impression materials—synthetic elastomers. In: Applied dental materials, 9th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 163–177 McCabe J, Walls A (2009) Elastic impression materials—synthetic elastomers. In: Applied dental materials, 9th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 163–177
19.
go back to reference McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu ARM, Drukker J, van Mameren H, Mazzotti G, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Caillaud M, Laforêt E, Riederer BM, Sanudo JR, Bueno-Lopez JL, Donate F, Sprumont P, Teofilovski-Parapid G, Moxham BJ (2008) The legal and ethical framework governing Body Donation in Europe—A review of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Eur J Anat 12(1):1–24 McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu ARM, Drukker J, van Mameren H, Mazzotti G, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Caillaud M, Laforêt E, Riederer BM, Sanudo JR, Bueno-Lopez JL, Donate F, Sprumont P, Teofilovski-Parapid G, Moxham BJ (2008) The legal and ethical framework governing Body Donation in Europe—A review of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Eur J Anat 12(1):1–24
20.
go back to reference Mörmann WH (2006) The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 137:7–13 Mörmann WH (2006) The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 137:7–13
21.
go back to reference Platzer W, Putz R, Poisel S (1978) Ein neues Konservierungs- und Aufbewahrungssystem für anatomisches Material. Acta Anat 102:60–67PubMed Platzer W, Putz R, Poisel S (1978) Ein neues Konservierungs- und Aufbewahrungssystem für anatomisches Material. Acta Anat 102:60–67PubMed
22.
go back to reference Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL (2016) Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 149:161–170PubMed Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL (2016) Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 149:161–170PubMed
23.
go back to reference Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C, Krumm M, Kasperl S, Holst A, Hirschfelder U (2011) Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 72:111–124PubMed Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C, Krumm M, Kasperl S, Holst A, Hirschfelder U (2011) Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 72:111–124PubMed
24.
go back to reference Tinsley D, O’Dwyer JJ, Benson PE, Doyle PT, Sandler J (2004) Orthodontic palatal implants: clinical technique. J Orthod 31:3–8PubMed Tinsley D, O’Dwyer JJ, Benson PE, Doyle PT, Sandler J (2004) Orthodontic palatal implants: clinical technique. J Orthod 31:3–8PubMed
25.
go back to reference Vogel AB, Kilic F, Schmidt F, Rübel S, Lapatki BG (2015) Optical 3D scans for orthodontic diagnostics performed on full-arch impressions. J Orofac Orthop 76:493–507PubMed Vogel AB, Kilic F, Schmidt F, Rübel S, Lapatki BG (2015) Optical 3D scans for orthodontic diagnostics performed on full-arch impressions. J Orofac Orthop 76:493–507PubMed
26.
go back to reference Winsauer H, Muchitsch AP, Winsauer C, Milnes R, Vlachojannis J, Walter A (2013) The TopJet for routine bodily molar distalization. J Clin Orthod 47:96–107PubMed Winsauer H, Muchitsch AP, Winsauer C, Milnes R, Vlachojannis J, Walter A (2013) The TopJet for routine bodily molar distalization. J Clin Orthod 47:96–107PubMed
27.
go back to reference Winsauer H, Vlachojannis J, Winsauer C, Ludwig B, Walter A (2013) A bone-borne appliance for rapid maxillary expansion. J Clin Orthod 47:375–381PubMed Winsauer H, Vlachojannis J, Winsauer C, Ludwig B, Walter A (2013) A bone-borne appliance for rapid maxillary expansion. J Clin Orthod 47:375–381PubMed
Metadata
Title
Impression material accuracy for palatal orthodontic miniscrews
Authors
Dr. Natalie Schenz
Dr. Vincent Schwarz
Romed Hörmann
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Adriano G. Crismani
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00245-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2020 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO