Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2018

Open Access 01-07-2018 | Original Article

Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions

A lateral cephalometric radiograph study

Authors: Aleš Čelar, Ekrem Tafaj, Alexandra Graf, Stefan Lettner

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Malocclusions affect about two-thirds of the population and orthodontic treatment is justified in 65% of these. However, the associations between anterior and posterior occlusal plane (AOP, POP) inclinations and Angle classification are lacking.

Patients and methods

In a retrospective study, lateral cephalometric radiograph tracings of 230 previously untreated Caucasians, aged 13 to 49 years, yielded inclines of the bisector occlusal plane, AOP, and POP. All inclinations were referenced to the Sella-Nasion line and the Frankfort horizontal and were assigned to the Angle classification as well as skeletal groups (retrognathic, neutral, prognathic). Quantile regressions were calculated.

Results

In the skeletal groups the angles between Sella-Nasion line and both AOP and POP were significantly different between the groups (p < 0.01), showing steep inclines in skeletal class II and flat inclines in skeletal class III. The angles Frankfort horizontal-to-POP and Frankfort horizontal-to-AOP showed the same trends but only the latter differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.02). Among the Angle groups, AOP inclinations did not differ significantly for both reference planes whereas POP inclinations were significantly different (p = 0.01 to Frankfort horizontal, p = 0.02 to Sella-Nasion). Angle class I patients showed the flattest POP.

Conclusion

Occlusal plane inclines, measured to Sella-Nasion, were more consistent than those referenced to Frankfort horizontal. Sella-Nasion related anterior and posterior occlusal plane inclinations were steep in skeletal class II and flat in skeletal class III patients over all quantiles. Using the Angle classification, anterior and posterior occlusal plane inclinations did not follow this principle.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braun S, Legan H (1997) Changes in occlusion related to the cant of the occlusal plane. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:184–188CrossRefPubMed Braun S, Legan H (1997) Changes in occlusion related to the cant of the occlusal plane. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:184–188CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Coro JC, Velasquez RL, Coro IM, Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Sato S (2016) Relationship of maxillary 3‑dimensional posterior occlusal plane to mandibular spatial position and morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150:140–152CrossRefPubMed Coro JC, Velasquez RL, Coro IM, Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Sato S (2016) Relationship of maxillary 3‑dimensional posterior occlusal plane to mandibular spatial position and morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150:140–152CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Downs WB (1956) Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 26:191–212 Downs WB (1956) Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 26:191–212
4.
go back to reference Emrich RE, Broadie AG (1965) Prevalence of class I, class II, and class III malocclusions (Angle) in an urban population. An epidemiological study. J Dent Res 44:947–953CrossRefPubMed Emrich RE, Broadie AG (1965) Prevalence of class I, class II, and class III malocclusions (Angle) in an urban population. An epidemiological study. J Dent Res 44:947–953CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Farella M, Michelotti A, van Eijden TM, Martina R (2002) The curve of Spee and craniofacial morphology: a multiple regression analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 110:277–281CrossRefPubMed Farella M, Michelotti A, van Eijden TM, Martina R (2002) The curve of Spee and craniofacial morphology: a multiple regression analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 110:277–281CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Freudenthaler J, Čelar A, Ritt C, Mitteroecker P (2017) Geometric morphometrics of different malocclusions in lateral skull radiographs. J Orofac Orthop 78:11–20CrossRefPubMed Freudenthaler J, Čelar A, Ritt C, Mitteroecker P (2017) Geometric morphometrics of different malocclusions in lateral skull radiographs. J Orofac Orthop 78:11–20CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fushima K, Kitamura Y, Mita H, Sato S, Suzuki Y, Kim Y (1996) Significance of the cant of the posterior occlusal plane in Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 18:27–40CrossRefPubMed Fushima K, Kitamura Y, Mita H, Sato S, Suzuki Y, Kim Y (1996) Significance of the cant of the posterior occlusal plane in Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 18:27–40CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Keeling SD, Riolo ML, Martin RE, Ten Have TR (1989) A multivariate approach to analyzing the relation between occlusion and craniofacial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95:297–305CrossRefPubMed Keeling SD, Riolo ML, Martin RE, Ten Have TR (1989) A multivariate approach to analyzing the relation between occlusion and craniofacial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95:297–305CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kim YH (1974) Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite. Am J Orthod 65:586–611CrossRefPubMed Kim YH (1974) Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open-bite. Am J Orthod 65:586–611CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kim YH, Vietas JJ (1978) Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 73:619–633CrossRefPubMed Kim YH, Vietas JJ (1978) Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 73:619–633CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Koenker R, Bassett G (1982) Tests of linear hypotheses and l1 estimation. Econometrica 50:1577–1584CrossRef Koenker R, Bassett G (1982) Tests of linear hypotheses and l1 estimation. Econometrica 50:1577–1584CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koenker R (2005) Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Koenker R (2005) Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Koenker R, Machado JAF (1999) Goodness of fit and related influence processes for quantile regression. J Am Stat Assoc 94:1296–1310CrossRef Koenker R, Machado JAF (1999) Goodness of fit and related influence processes for quantile regression. J Am Stat Assoc 94:1296–1310CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lahori M, Nagrath R, Malik N (2013) A cephalometric study on the relationship between the occlusal plane, Ala-Tragus and Camper’s lines in subjects with Angle’s class I, class II and class III occlusion. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13:494–498CrossRefPubMed Lahori M, Nagrath R, Malik N (2013) A cephalometric study on the relationship between the occlusal plane, Ala-Tragus and Camper’s lines in subjects with Angle’s class I, class II and class III occlusion. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 13:494–498CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Marshall SD, Caspersen M, Hardinger RR, Franciscus RG, Aquilino SA, Southard TE (2008) Development of the curve of Spee. Am J Orthod 134:344–352CrossRef Marshall SD, Caspersen M, Hardinger RR, Franciscus RG, Aquilino SA, Southard TE (2008) Development of the curve of Spee. Am J Orthod 134:344–352CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ (1998) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 13:97–106PubMed Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ (1998) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 13:97–106PubMed
20.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW (1999) Contemporary orthodontics, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 125–137 Proffit WR, Fields HW (1999) Contemporary orthodontics, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 125–137
21.
go back to reference Reyes BC, Bacetti T, McNamara JA Jr (2006) An estimate of craniofacial growth in class IIII malocclusion. Angle Orthod 76:577–584PubMed Reyes BC, Bacetti T, McNamara JA Jr (2006) An estimate of craniofacial growth in class IIII malocclusion. Angle Orthod 76:577–584PubMed
22.
go back to reference Sato M, Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Hosoi K, Mitsui N, Shimizu N (2007) Inclination of the occlusal plane is associated with the direction of the masticatory movement path. Eur J Orthod 29:21–25CrossRefPubMed Sato M, Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Hosoi K, Mitsui N, Shimizu N (2007) Inclination of the occlusal plane is associated with the direction of the masticatory movement path. Eur J Orthod 29:21–25CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sato S (1987) Alteration of occlusal plane due to posterior discrepancy related to development of malocclusion—introduction to denture frame analysis. Bull Kanagawa Dent Coll 15:115–123 Sato S (1987) Alteration of occlusal plane due to posterior discrepancy related to development of malocclusion—introduction to denture frame analysis. Bull Kanagawa Dent Coll 15:115–123
24.
go back to reference Schudy FF (1963) Cant of the occlusal plane and axial inclinations of the teeth. Angle Orthod 33:69–82 Schudy FF (1963) Cant of the occlusal plane and axial inclinations of the teeth. Angle Orthod 33:69–82
25.
go back to reference Shaughnessy T, Shire LH (1988) Etiology of class II malocclusions. Pediatr Dent 10:336–338PubMed Shaughnessy T, Shire LH (1988) Etiology of class II malocclusions. Pediatr Dent 10:336–338PubMed
26.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Smith RA (1939) The etiology of angle class II division I malocclusion. Angle Orthod 9:15–19 Smith RA (1939) The etiology of angle class II division I malocclusion. Angle Orthod 9:15–19
28.
go back to reference Tanaka EM, Sato S (2008) Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:602.e1–602.e11 Tanaka EM, Sato S (2008) Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:602.e1–602.e11
29.
go back to reference Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, de Mayorga C (2001) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development. Eur J Orthod 23:153–167CrossRefPubMed Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, de Mayorga C (2001) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development. Eur J Orthod 23:153–167CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B (1997) Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:165–170CrossRefPubMed Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B (1997) Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:165–170CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ye R, Wang S, Pei J, Zhao M (2012) Cephalometric analysis of the relationship between occlusal plane and sagittal position of the mandible. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 30:610–614PubMed Ye R, Wang S, Pei J, Zhao M (2012) Cephalometric analysis of the relationship between occlusal plane and sagittal position of the mandible. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 30:610–614PubMed
Metadata
Title
Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions
A lateral cephalometric radiograph study
Authors
Aleš Čelar
Ekrem Tafaj
Alexandra Graf
Stefan Lettner
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-018-0139-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2018 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Mitteilungen DGKFO