Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2017

Open Access 01-01-2017 | Original Article

Geometric morphometrics of different malocclusions in lateral skull radiographs

Authors: Josef Freudenthaler, Aleš Čelar, Christopher Ritt, Philipp Mitteröcker

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the role of craniofacial shape in malocclusion by application of geometric morphometrics to a set of two-dimensional landmarks and semilandmarks obtained from lateral skull radiographs.

Methods

Cephalometric radiograph tracings of 88 untreated Caucasians (age range 7–39 years) were assigned to four groups according to their occlusion: neutrocclusion, distocclusion, mesiocclusion, and anterior open bite. The geometric morphometric shape analysis incorporated 66 landmarks and semilandmarks, which underwent generalized Procrustes analysis, between-groups principal component analysis, thin-plate spline deformation grid visualization, permutation tests, and receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results

The position and shape of the mandible contributed to differences between the distocclusion and mesiocclusion groups, whereas the maxillary shape showed less variation. The growth-related shape alteration during adolescence was most pronounced in the mesiocclusion group and least pronounced in the neutrocclusion group. The open bite group was associated with an altered orientation of the mandibular body and the maxilla,  showed the most hyperdivergent maxillomandibular pattern but was not an own skeletal entity. Despite clear differences in mean shape across the four groups, the individual distribution of craniofacial shape overlapped between the groups without discrete clusters.

Conclusions

Craniofacial shape was clearly associated with dental malocclusion and showed considerable variation. Geometric morphometrics was a powerful research tool but for diagnosing individual malocclusion standard cephalometric measurements including overjet and overbite were equally or more efficient than geometric morphometric descriptors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Afrand M, Ling CP, Khosrotehrani S, Flores-Mir C, Lagravère-Vich MO (2014) Anterior cranial-base time-related changes: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 146(21–32):e6 Afrand M, Ling CP, Khosrotehrani S, Flores-Mir C, Lagravère-Vich MO (2014) Anterior cranial-base time-related changes: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 146(21–32):e6
2.
go back to reference Agarwal A, Pandey H, Bajaj K, Pandey L (2013) Changes in cranial base morphology in Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusions. J Int Oral Health 5:39–42PubMedPubMedCentral Agarwal A, Pandey H, Bajaj K, Pandey L (2013) Changes in cranial base morphology in Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusions. J Int Oral Health 5:39–42PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Bookstein FL (1997) Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1:225–243CrossRefPubMed Bookstein FL (1997) Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1:225–243CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Čelar AG, Onodera K, Bertl MH, Astl E, Bantleon H-P, Sato S, Mitteroecker P (2014) Geometric morphometric evaluations of a randomized prospective split-mouth study on modes of ligation and reverse-curve mechanics. Orthod Craniofac Res 17:158–169CrossRefPubMed Čelar AG, Onodera K, Bertl MH, Astl E, Bantleon H-P, Sato S, Mitteroecker P (2014) Geometric morphometric evaluations of a randomized prospective split-mouth study on modes of ligation and reverse-curve mechanics. Orthod Craniofac Res 17:158–169CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cevidanes LH, Franco AA, Gerig G, Proffit WR, Slice DE, Enlow DH, Yamashita HK, Kim YJ, Scanavini MA, Vigorito JW (2005) Assessment of mandibular growth and response to orthopedic treatment with 3-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128:16–26CrossRef Cevidanes LH, Franco AA, Gerig G, Proffit WR, Slice DE, Enlow DH, Yamashita HK, Kim YJ, Scanavini MA, Vigorito JW (2005) Assessment of mandibular growth and response to orthopedic treatment with 3-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 128:16–26CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cleall JF, BeGole EA, Chebib FS (1979) Craniofacial morphology: A principal component analysis. Am J Orthod 75:650–666CrossRefPubMed Cleall JF, BeGole EA, Chebib FS (1979) Craniofacial morphology: A principal component analysis. Am J Orthod 75:650–666CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ellis E, McNamara JA Jr (1984) Components of adult class III open-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod 86:277–290CrossRefPubMed Ellis E, McNamara JA Jr (1984) Components of adult class III open-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod 86:277–290CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Enlow DH, Hans MG (1996) Essentials of facial growth. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 180 Enlow DH, Hans MG (1996) Essentials of facial growth. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 180
11.
go back to reference Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB (1971) The morphological and morphogenetic basis for craniofacial form and pattern. Am J Orthod 41:161–188 Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB (1971) The morphological and morphogenetic basis for craniofacial form and pattern. Am J Orthod 41:161–188
12.
13.
go back to reference Grayson BH, Weintraub N, Bookstein FL, McCarthy JG (1985) A comparative cephalometric study of the cranial base and craniofacial anomalies: part I: tensor analysis. Cleft Pal J 22:75–87 Grayson BH, Weintraub N, Bookstein FL, McCarthy JG (1985) A comparative cephalometric study of the cranial base and craniofacial anomalies: part I: tensor analysis. Cleft Pal J 22:75–87
14.
go back to reference Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG (1986) Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 56:7–30PubMed Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG (1986) Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 56:7–30PubMed
15.
go back to reference Halazonetis DJ (2004) Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 125:571–581CrossRef Halazonetis DJ (2004) Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 125:571–581CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Saitoh S, Mizoguchi I (2012) Morphological analysis of the skeletal remains of Japanese females from the Ikenohata-Shichikencho site. Eur J Orthod 34:575–581CrossRefPubMed Hayashi K, Saitoh S, Mizoguchi I (2012) Morphological analysis of the skeletal remains of Japanese females from the Ikenohata-Shichikencho site. Eur J Orthod 34:575–581CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Isaacson JR, Isaacson JI, Speidel TM, Worms FW (1971) Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod 41:219–229PubMed Isaacson JR, Isaacson JI, Speidel TM, Worms FW (1971) Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod 41:219–229PubMed
18.
go back to reference KimYH Vietas JJ (1978) Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 73:619–633CrossRef KimYH Vietas JJ (1978) Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 73:619–633CrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Krey KF, Dannhauer KH (2008) Morphometric analysis of facial profile in adults. J Orofac Orthop 68:424–436CrossRef Krey KF, Dannhauer KH (2008) Morphometric analysis of facial profile in adults. J Orofac Orthop 68:424–436CrossRef
21.
go back to reference McIntyre GT, Mossey PA (2003) Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics. Eur J Orthod 25:231–242CrossRefPubMed McIntyre GT, Mossey PA (2003) Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics. Eur J Orthod 25:231–242CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Melsen B (1974) The cranial base. The postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand 32(Suppl):1–126 Melsen B (1974) The cranial base. The postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand 32(Suppl):1–126
23.
go back to reference Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Neubauer S, Müller GB (2012) How to explore morphological integration in human evolution and development. Evol Biol 39:536–553CrossRef Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Neubauer S, Müller GB (2012) How to explore morphological integration in human evolution and development. Evol Biol 39:536–553CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mitteroecker PM, Bookstein FL (2011) Linear discrimination, ordination, and the visualization of selection gradients in modern morphometrics. Evol Biol 38:100–114CrossRef Mitteroecker PM, Bookstein FL (2011) Linear discrimination, ordination, and the visualization of selection gradients in modern morphometrics. Evol Biol 38:100–114CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mitteroecker PM, Gunz P (2009) Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol 36:235–247 Mitteroecker PM, Gunz P (2009) Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol Biol 36:235–247
26.
go back to reference Molina-Berlanga N, Llopis-Perez J, Flores-Mir C, Puigdollers A (2013) Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among class I and III malocclusion patients with different skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod 83:948–955CrossRefPubMed Molina-Berlanga N, Llopis-Perez J, Flores-Mir C, Puigdollers A (2013) Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among class I and III malocclusion patients with different skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod 83:948–955CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Moreno Uribe LM, Howe SC, Kummet C, Vela KC, Dawson DV, Southard TE (2014) Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:305–316CrossRef Moreno Uribe LM, Howe SC, Kummet C, Vela KC, Dawson DV, Southard TE (2014) Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:305–316CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Moreno Uribe LM, Vela KC, Kummet C, Dawson DV, Southard TE (2013) Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 144:32–42CrossRef Moreno Uribe LM, Vela KC, Kummet C, Dawson DV, Southard TE (2013) Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 144:32–42CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Moyers RE, Bookstein FL (1979) The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 75:599–617CrossRefPubMed Moyers RE, Bookstein FL (1979) The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 75:599–617CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW (1999) Contemporary Orthodontics, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 146–196 Proffit WR, Fields HW (1999) Contemporary Orthodontics, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 146–196
31.
go back to reference Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40–59CrossRef Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (1990) Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40–59CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sanggarnjanavanich S, Sekiya T, Nomura Y, Nakayama T, Hanada M, Nakamura Y (2014) Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 146:82–91CrossRef Sanggarnjanavanich S, Sekiya T, Nomura Y, Nakayama T, Hanada M, Nakamura Y (2014) Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 146:82–91CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Sassouni V, Nanda S (1964) Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod 50:801–823CrossRef Sassouni V, Nanda S (1964) Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod 50:801–823CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Schudy FF (1968) The control of vertical overbite in clinical orthodontics. Angle Orthod 38:19–39PubMed Schudy FF (1968) The control of vertical overbite in clinical orthodontics. Angle Orthod 38:19–39PubMed
35.
go back to reference Singh GD, McNamara JA Jr, Lozanoff S (1998) Procrustes, Euclidean and cephalometric analyses of the morphology of the mandible in human class III malocclusions. Arch Oral Biol 43:535–543CrossRefPubMed Singh GD, McNamara JA Jr, Lozanoff S (1998) Procrustes, Euclidean and cephalometric analyses of the morphology of the mandible in human class III malocclusions. Arch Oral Biol 43:535–543CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Singh P, Davies TI (2011) A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication versus the hand-tracing method—a preliminary study. Eur J Orthod 33:350–353CrossRefPubMed Singh P, Davies TI (2011) A comparison of cephalometric measurements: a picture archiving and communication versus the hand-tracing method—a preliminary study. Eur J Orthod 33:350–353CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Solow B (1980) The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Brit J Orthod 7:145–161CrossRef Solow B (1980) The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Brit J Orthod 7:145–161CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sung-Jin K, Kyung-Ho K, Hyung-Seog Y, Hyoung-Seon B (2014) Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:317–324CrossRef Sung-Jin K, Kyung-Ho K, Hyung-Seog Y, Hyoung-Seon B (2014) Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:317–324CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Wardlaw DW, Smith RJ, Hertweck DW, Hildebolt CF (1992) Cephalometrics of anterior open bite: a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:234–243CrossRef Wardlaw DW, Smith RJ, Hertweck DW, Hildebolt CF (1992) Cephalometrics of anterior open bite: a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:234–243CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Yoon SS, Chung CH (2015) Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 147:190–196CrossRef Yoon SS, Chung CH (2015) Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 147:190–196CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Geometric morphometrics of different malocclusions in lateral skull radiographs
Authors
Josef Freudenthaler
Aleš Čelar
Christopher Ritt
Philipp Mitteröcker
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0057-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2017 Go to the issue