Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2011

01-11-2011 | Original article

Comparison of estimated and actual changes in gap widths of expansion screws in plate appliances with 7- and 14-day activation

Authors: Dr. T.C. Schott, L. Engelhard, D. Gómez-Serrano, H. Meyer-Gutknecht

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine how gap opening is affected by the activation intervals of expansion screws in removable orthodontic appliances and which gap widths are achievable during therapy.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, the increases in gap widths for transverse and distalizing screws activated at 7- and 14-day intervals were calculated. These estimates were based on measurements taken with a caliper of the gap widths of 242 screws integrated in the plates of 137 patients examined during 4–5 follow-up visits over a 6- to 7-month therapy period.

Results

A comparison of the theoretical gap widths that we had estimated with those actually measured revealed for the first time that differences in activation intervals have a statistically significant effect on gap width. The 7- and 14-day activation intervals can lead to a linear or nonlinear increase in gap width that greatly depends on the type of expansion screw. Within the therapy period, transverse screws achieved gap widths as much as twice as wide as those achieved with the distalizing screw.

Conclusion

The gap widths are illustrated in graphs and summarized in tables. These values offer practical orientation for clinicians planning and controlling the therapy course, and they can help to prevent “overactivation” with removable expansion plates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Akin E, Gurton AU, Sagdic D (2006) Effects of a segmented removable appliance in molar distalization. Eur J Orthod 28:65–73PubMedCrossRef Akin E, Gurton AU, Sagdic D (2006) Effects of a segmented removable appliance in molar distalization. Eur J Orthod 28:65–73PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bimler HP, Bimler AB (1987) Die Überwachung der kieferorthopädischen Behandlung durch individuelle Reaktionskurven. Fortschr Kieferorthop 48:371–378PubMedCrossRef Bimler HP, Bimler AB (1987) Die Überwachung der kieferorthopädischen Behandlung durch individuelle Reaktionskurven. Fortschr Kieferorthop 48:371–378PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bjerklin K (2000) Follow-up control of patients with unilateral posterior cross-bite treated with expansion plates or the quad-helix appliance. J Orofac Orthop 61:112–124PubMedCrossRef Bjerklin K (2000) Follow-up control of patients with unilateral posterior cross-bite treated with expansion plates or the quad-helix appliance. J Orofac Orthop 61:112–124PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Erdinc AE, Ugur T, Erbay E (1999) A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:287–300PubMedCrossRef Erdinc AE, Ugur T, Erbay E (1999) A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:287–300PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Göz GR, Bacher M, Ney T et al (1992) Die transversale Dehnung mit Plattenapparaturen – intermolare Stabilität und Bedeutung für gingivale Rezessionen. Fortschr Kieferorthop 53:344–348PubMedCrossRef Göz GR, Bacher M, Ney T et al (1992) Die transversale Dehnung mit Plattenapparaturen – intermolare Stabilität und Bedeutung für gingivale Rezessionen. Fortschr Kieferorthop 53:344–348PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Grohmann U (2005) Kieferorthopädische Apparaturen. Steinkopff, Darmstadt Grohmann U (2005) Kieferorthopädische Apparaturen. Steinkopff, Darmstadt
7.
8.
go back to reference Hermanson H, Kurol J, Ronnerman A (1985) Treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite with quad-helix and removable plates. A retrospective study. Eur J Orthod 7:97–102PubMed Hermanson H, Kurol J, Ronnerman A (1985) Treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite with quad-helix and removable plates. A retrospective study. Eur J Orthod 7:97–102PubMed
9.
go back to reference Knak S (2004) Praxisleitfaden Kieferorthopädie. Elsevier, Urban & Fischer, München Knak S (2004) Praxisleitfaden Kieferorthopädie. Elsevier, Urban & Fischer, München
10.
go back to reference Miethke RR, Wronski C (2009) What can be achieved with removable orthodontic appliances? J Orofac Orthop 70:185–199PubMedCrossRef Miethke RR, Wronski C (2009) What can be achieved with removable orthodontic appliances? J Orofac Orthop 70:185–199PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference O’Grady PW, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T et al (2006) A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:202–213CrossRef O’Grady PW, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T et al (2006) A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:202–213CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Paul LD, O’Brien KD, Mandall NA (2002) Upper removable appliance or Jones Jig for distalizing first molars? A randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 5:238–242PubMedCrossRef Paul LD, O’Brien KD, Mandall NA (2002) Upper removable appliance or Jones Jig for distalizing first molars? A randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 5:238–242PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Petrén S, Bjerklin K, Ake Marke L et al (2011) Early correction of posterior crossbite – a cost-minimization analysis. Eur J Orthod Petrén S, Bjerklin K, Ake Marke L et al (2011) Early correction of posterior crossbite – a cost-minimization analysis. Eur J Orthod
14.
go back to reference Petrén S, Bondemark L (2008) Correction of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:790 e7–790 e13PubMedCrossRef Petrén S, Bondemark L (2008) Correction of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:790 e7–790 e13PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sander FG, Sander C (2011) Plattenapparaturen. In: Sander FG, Schwenzer N, Ehrenfeld M (eds) Kieferorthopädie. 2. neu erstellte und erweiterte Aufl. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 77–110 Sander FG, Sander C (2011) Plattenapparaturen. In: Sander FG, Schwenzer N, Ehrenfeld M (eds) Kieferorthopädie. 2. neu erstellte und erweiterte Aufl. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 77–110
16.
go back to reference Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH et al (2010) Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:262 e1–262 e11; discussion −3PubMedCrossRef Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH et al (2010) Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:262 e1–262 e11; discussion −3PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tai K, Park JH (2010) Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using cone-beam computed tomography. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35:111–120PubMed Tai K, Park JH (2010) Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using cone-beam computed tomography. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35:111–120PubMed
18.
go back to reference Tai K, Park JH, Mishima K et al (2011) 3-Dimensional cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse changes with Schwarz appliances on both jaws. Angle Orthod 81:670–677PubMedCrossRef Tai K, Park JH, Mishima K et al (2011) 3-Dimensional cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse changes with Schwarz appliances on both jaws. Angle Orthod 81:670–677PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Weyrich C, Noss M, Lisson JA (2010) Comparison of a modified RME appliance with other appliances for transverse maxillary expansion. J Orofac Orthop 71:265–272PubMedCrossRef Weyrich C, Noss M, Lisson JA (2010) Comparison of a modified RME appliance with other appliances for transverse maxillary expansion. J Orofac Orthop 71:265–272PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of estimated and actual changes in gap widths of expansion screws in plate appliances with 7- and 14-day activation
Authors
Dr. T.C. Schott
L. Engelhard
D. Gómez-Serrano
H. Meyer-Gutknecht
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-011-0049-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 6/2011 Go to the issue

Informationen

DGKFO-Seiten