Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 1/2022

01-01-2022 | COVID-19 | Original Article

Vitamin D supplementation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: R. Pal, M. Banerjee, S. K. Bhadada, A. J. Shetty, B. Singh, A. Vyas

Published in: Journal of Endocrinological Investigation | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To provide a precise summary and collate the hitherto available clinical evidence on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched using appropriate keywords till June 8, 2021, to identify observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting adverse clinical outcomes (ICU admission and/or mortality) in COVID-19 patients receiving vitamin D supplementation vs. those not receiving the same. Both prior use and use of vitamin D after COVID-19 diagnosis were considered. Unadjusted/adjusted pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021248488).

Results

We identified 13 studies (10 observational, 3 RCTs) pooling data retrieved from 2933 COVID-19 patients. Pooled analysis of unadjusted data showed that vitamin D use in COVID-19 was significantly associated with reduced ICU admission/mortality (OR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.81, p = 0.01, I2 = 66%, random-effects model). Similarly, on pooling adjusted risk estimates, vitamin D was also found to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes (pooled OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.91, p = 0.03, I2 = 80%, random-effects model). Subgroup analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation was associated with improved clinical outcomes only in patients receiving the drug post-COVID-19 diagnosis and not in those who had received vitamin D before diagnosis.

Conclusions

Vitamin D supplementation might be associated with improved clinical outcomes, especially when administered after the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, issues regarding the appropriate dose, duration, and mode of administration of vitamin D remain unanswered and need further research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
20.
go back to reference Higgins J, Sterne J, Savovic J et al (2016) A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:29–31 Higgins J, Sterne J, Savovic J et al (2016) A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:29–31
Metadata
Title
Vitamin D supplementation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
R. Pal
M. Banerjee
S. K. Bhadada
A. J. Shetty
B. Singh
A. Vyas
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
COVID-19
Published in
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1720-8386
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-021-01614-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 1/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine