Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Article

Prediction of different ovarian responses using anti-Müllerian hormone following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF

Authors: Z. Heidar, M. Bakhtiyari, M. Mirzamoradi, S. Zadehmodarres, F. S. Sarfjoo, M. A. Mansournia

Published in: Journal of Endocrinological Investigation | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to predict the poor and excessive ovarian response using anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels following a long agonist protocol in IVF candidates.

Research design and methods

Through a prospective cohort study, the type of relationship and appropriate scale for AMH were determined using the fractional polynomial regression. To determine the effect of AMH on the outcomes of ovarian stimulation and different ovarian responses, the multi-nominal and negative binomial regression models were fitted using backward stepwise method. The ovarian response of study subject who entered a standard long-term treatment cycle with GnRH agonist was evaluated using prediction model, separately and in combined models with (ROC) curves.

Results

The use of standard long-term treatments with GnRH agonist led to positive pregnancy test results in 30 % of treated patients. With each unit increase in the log of AMH, the odds ratio of having poor response compared to normal response decreases by 64 % (OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.19–0.68). Also the results of negative binomial regression model indicated that for one unit increase in the log of AMH blood levels, the odds of releasing an oocyte increased 24 % (OR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.14–1.35). The optimal cut-off points of AMH for predicting excessive and poor ovarian responses were 3.4 and 1.2 ng/ml, respectively, with area under curves of 0.69 (0.60–0.77) and 0.76 (0.66–0.86), respectively.

Conclusion

By considering the age of the patient undergoing infertility treatment as a variable affecting ovulation, use of AMH levels showed to be a good test to discriminate between different ovarian responses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D’Anna R, Rienzi L (2014) Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new? Biomed Res Int 2014:Art ID 352098. doi:10.1155/2014/352098 Ubaldi F, Vaiarelli A, D’Anna R, Rienzi L (2014) Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new? Biomed Res Int 2014:Art ID 352098. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​352098
2.
go back to reference Jirge PR, Chougule SM, Gavali VG, Bhomkar DA (2014) Impact of dehydroepiandrosterone on clinical outcome in poor responders: a pilot study in women undergoing in vitro fertilization, using bologna criteria. JHRS 7:175PubMedCentralPubMed Jirge PR, Chougule SM, Gavali VG, Bhomkar DA (2014) Impact of dehydroepiandrosterone on clinical outcome in poor responders: a pilot study in women undergoing in vitro fertilization, using bologna criteria. JHRS 7:175PubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ravhon A, Lavery S, Michael S, Donaldson M, Margara R, Trew G et al (2000) Dynamic assays of inhibin B and oestradiol following buserelin acetate administration as predictors of ovarian response in IVF. Hum Reprod 15:2297–2301CrossRefPubMed Ravhon A, Lavery S, Michael S, Donaldson M, Margara R, Trew G et al (2000) Dynamic assays of inhibin B and oestradiol following buserelin acetate administration as predictors of ovarian response in IVF. Hum Reprod 15:2297–2301CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fauser B, Diedrich K, Devroey P (2008) Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod Update 14:1–14CrossRefPubMed Fauser B, Diedrich K, Devroey P (2008) Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod Update 14:1–14CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yassin MM, Sharif FA, Laqqan MM (2013) Anti-mullerian hormone as a predictor of ovarian reserve and ovarian response in IVF women from Gaza strip. Iran J Reprod Med 11:261 Yassin MM, Sharif FA, Laqqan MM (2013) Anti-mullerian hormone as a predictor of ovarian reserve and ovarian response in IVF women from Gaza strip. Iran J Reprod Med 11:261
6.
go back to reference Maheshwari A, Fowler P, Bhattacharya S (2006) Assessment of ovarian reserve—should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum Reprod 21:2729–2735CrossRefPubMed Maheshwari A, Fowler P, Bhattacharya S (2006) Assessment of ovarian reserve—should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum Reprod 21:2729–2735CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston R (1997) Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod 12:294–297CrossRefPubMed Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston R (1997) Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod 12:294–297CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Broekmans FJ, Faddy M, te Velde ER (2005) Ovarian reserve and reproductive age may be determined from measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography. Hum Reprod 20:1114–1115CrossRefPubMed Broekmans FJ, Faddy M, te Velde ER (2005) Ovarian reserve and reproductive age may be determined from measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography. Hum Reprod 20:1114–1115CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chang M-Y, Chiang C-H, Hsieh T, Soong Y, Hsu K (1998) Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 69:505–510CrossRefPubMed Chang M-Y, Chiang C-H, Hsieh T, Soong Y, Hsu K (1998) Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 69:505–510CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hendriks DJ, Mol BWJ, Bancsi LF, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ (2005) Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril 83:291–301CrossRefPubMed Hendriks DJ, Mol BWJ, Bancsi LF, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ (2005) Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril 83:291–301CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N (2010) A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 93:855–864CrossRefPubMed Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N (2010) A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 93:855–864CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Van Rooij I, Broekmans F, Te Velde E, Fauser B, Bancsi L, De Jong F et al (2002) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 17:3065–3071CrossRefPubMed Van Rooij I, Broekmans F, Te Velde E, Fauser B, Bancsi L, De Jong F et al (2002) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 17:3065–3071CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Radi D, Argento C, Baraldi E, Artenisio AC et al (2010) Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update 16:113–130CrossRefPubMed La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Radi D, Argento C, Baraldi E, Artenisio AC et al (2010) Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update 16:113–130CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lin P-Y, Huang F-J, Kung F-T, Chiang H-J, Lin Y-J, Lin Y-C et al (2014) Evaluation of serum anti-mullerian hormone as a biomarker of early ovarian aging in young women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycle. Int J Clin Exp Patho 7:6245 Lin P-Y, Huang F-J, Kung F-T, Chiang H-J, Lin Y-J, Lin Y-C et al (2014) Evaluation of serum anti-mullerian hormone as a biomarker of early ovarian aging in young women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycle. Int J Clin Exp Patho 7:6245
15.
go back to reference Chang HJ, Han SH, Lee JR, Jee BC, Lee BI, Suh CS et al (2010) Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril 94:343–349CrossRefPubMed Chang HJ, Han SH, Lee JR, Jee BC, Lee BI, Suh CS et al (2010) Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril 94:343–349CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Singh N, Malik E, Banerjee A, Chosdol K, Sreenivas V, Mittal S (2013) “Anti-Mullerian hormone: marker for ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF patients”: a first pilot study in the Indian population. J Obstet Gynecol India 63:268–272CrossRef Singh N, Malik E, Banerjee A, Chosdol K, Sreenivas V, Mittal S (2013) “Anti-Mullerian hormone: marker for ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF patients”: a first pilot study in the Indian population. J Obstet Gynecol India 63:268–272CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Li HWR, Wong CYG, Yeung WSB, Ho PC, Ng EHY (2011) Serum anti-müllerian hormone level is not altered in women using hormonal contraceptives. Contraception 83:582–585CrossRefPubMed Li HWR, Wong CYG, Yeung WSB, Ho PC, Ng EHY (2011) Serum anti-müllerian hormone level is not altered in women using hormonal contraceptives. Contraception 83:582–585CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W (2006) Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med 25:127–141CrossRefPubMed Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W (2006) Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med 25:127–141CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jacoby WG (2000) Loess. a nonparametric, graphical tool for depicting relationships between variables. Electoral Stud 19:577–613CrossRef Jacoby WG (2000) Loess. a nonparametric, graphical tool for depicting relationships between variables. Electoral Stud 19:577–613CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Royston P, Sauerbrei W (2008) Multivariable model-building: a pragmatic approach to regression anaylsis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables. Wiley, LondonCrossRef Royston P, Sauerbrei W (2008) Multivariable model-building: a pragmatic approach to regression anaylsis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables. Wiley, LondonCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, BerlinCrossRef Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hilbe JM (2011) Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Hilbe JM (2011) Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Anderson R, Nelson S, Wallace W (2012) Measuring anti-Müllerian hormone for the assessment of ovarian reserve: when and for whom is it indicated? Maturitas 71:28–33CrossRefPubMed Anderson R, Nelson S, Wallace W (2012) Measuring anti-Müllerian hormone for the assessment of ovarian reserve: when and for whom is it indicated? Maturitas 71:28–33CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Streuli I, Fraisse T, Pillet C, Ibecheole V, Bischof P, De Ziegler D (2008) Serum antimüllerian hormone levels remain stable throughout the menstrual cycle and after oral or vaginal administration of synthetic sex steroids. Fertil Steril 90:395–400CrossRefPubMed Streuli I, Fraisse T, Pillet C, Ibecheole V, Bischof P, De Ziegler D (2008) Serum antimüllerian hormone levels remain stable throughout the menstrual cycle and after oral or vaginal administration of synthetic sex steroids. Fertil Steril 90:395–400CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC, Volpe A (2006) Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 21:3103–3107CrossRefPubMed La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC, Volpe A (2006) Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 21:3103–3107CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hamdine O, Eijkemans M, Lentjes E, Torrance H, Macklon N, Fauser B et al (2015) Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Müllerian hormone. Hum Reprod 30:170–178 Hamdine O, Eijkemans M, Lentjes E, Torrance H, Macklon N, Fauser B et al (2015) Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Müllerian hormone. Hum Reprod 30:170–178
27.
go back to reference Ficicioglu C, Cenksoy PO, Yildirim G, Kaspar C (2014) Which cut-off value of serum anti-Müllerian hormone level can predict poor ovarian reserve, poor ovarian response to stimulation and in vitro fertilization success? A prospective data analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol 30:372–376CrossRefPubMed Ficicioglu C, Cenksoy PO, Yildirim G, Kaspar C (2014) Which cut-off value of serum anti-Müllerian hormone level can predict poor ovarian reserve, poor ovarian response to stimulation and in vitro fertilization success? A prospective data analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol 30:372–376CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ganidou MA, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Gerou S, Makedos GA, Klearchou N et al (2014) Is assessment of anti-mullerian hormone and/or antral follicle count useful in the prediction of ovarian response in expected normal responders treated with a fixed dose of recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists? A prospective observational study. Gynecol Endocrinol 30:817–821CrossRefPubMed Ganidou MA, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Gerou S, Makedos GA, Klearchou N et al (2014) Is assessment of anti-mullerian hormone and/or antral follicle count useful in the prediction of ovarian response in expected normal responders treated with a fixed dose of recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists? A prospective observational study. Gynecol Endocrinol 30:817–821CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Vural B, Cakiroglu Y, Vural F, Filiz S (2014) Hormonal and functional biomarkers in ovarian response. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1355–1361CrossRefPubMed Vural B, Cakiroglu Y, Vural F, Filiz S (2014) Hormonal and functional biomarkers in ovarian response. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:1355–1361CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Broekmans F, Kwee J, Hendriks D, Mol B, Lambalk C (2006) A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 12:685–718CrossRefPubMed Broekmans F, Kwee J, Hendriks D, Mol B, Lambalk C (2006) A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 12:685–718CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Tokura Y, Yoshino O, Ogura-Nose S, Motoyama H, Harada M, Osuga Y et al (2013) The significance of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in patients over age 40 in first IVF treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 30:821–825PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Tokura Y, Yoshino O, Ogura-Nose S, Motoyama H, Harada M, Osuga Y et al (2013) The significance of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in patients over age 40 in first IVF treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 30:821–825PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Verhagen T, Hendriks D, Bancsi L, Mol B, Broekmans F (2008) The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 14:95–100CrossRefPubMed Verhagen T, Hendriks D, Bancsi L, Mol B, Broekmans F (2008) The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 14:95–100CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Cook NR (2008) Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve. Clin Chem 54:17–23CrossRefPubMed Cook NR (2008) Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve. Clin Chem 54:17–23CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Elder K, Dale B (2010) In-vitro fertilization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Elder K, Dale B (2010) In-vitro fertilization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prediction of different ovarian responses using anti-Müllerian hormone following a long agonist treatment protocol for IVF
Authors
Z. Heidar
M. Bakhtiyari
M. Mirzamoradi
S. Zadehmodarres
F. S. Sarfjoo
M. A. Mansournia
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation / Issue 9/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1720-8386
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0297-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 9/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine