Top

Published in:

Open Access 14-03-2022 | Review Article

A Narrative Review of the Current State of Extended Reality Technology and How it can be Utilised in Sport

Authors: Peter Le Noury, Remco Polman, Michael Maloney, Adam Gorman

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 7/2022

Abstract

Extended reality is an umbrella term used to describe three computer-generated technologies including virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality. Extended reality is an emerging technology that has been utilised in many high-performance domains including psychology, medicine and the military, with the aim of enhancing perceptual-cognitive skills and motor skills. However, the use of extended reality in sport, particularly at the elite level, has only recently started to receive attention. While the growth of extended reality technology continues to accelerate at a rapid rate, empirical evidence aimed at understanding how these devices can best be applied in high-performance sport has not followed suit. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to provide clarity for high-performance sport organisations, researchers, sport scientists, coaches and athletes about the current state of extended reality technology and how it has been utilised in sport. In doing so, we first define and give examples of the types of extended reality technology including virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality that are available at the present time. Second, we detail how skill acquisition principles underpinned by the theoretical framework of ecological dynamics can be used to help inform the design and assessment of extended reality training tools. Third, we describe how extended reality has been utilised in sport, including how extended reality tools have been assessed for their level of representativeness, and the effectiveness of extended reality training interventions for improving perceptual-cognitive skills and motor skills. Finally, we discuss the future utilisation of extended reality in sport, including the key learnings that can be drawn from other domains, future research directions, practical applications and areas for consideration related to the use of extended reality for training skills in sport.

Abernethy B, Wood JM. Do generalized visual training programmes for sport really work? An experimental investigation. J Sports Sci. 2001;19(3):203–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404101750095376.CrossRefPubMed

Ludlow BL. Virtual reality: emerging applications and future directions. Rural Spec Educ Quarterly. 2015;34(3):3–10.CrossRef

Rizzo AS, Buckwalter JG, Forbell E, Reist C, Difede J, Rothbaum BO, et al. Virtual reality applications to address the wounds of war. Psychiatr Ann. 2013;43(3):123–38.CrossRef

Koutitas G, Smith KS, Lawrence G, Metsis V, Stamper C, Trahan M, et al. A virtual and augmented reality platform for the training of first responders of the ambulance bus. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments; 2019; p. 299–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3316782.3321542.

Casey GW. Comprehensive soldier fitness: a vision for psychological resilience in the U.S. Army. Am Psychol. 2011;66(1):1–3.PubMedCrossRef

Gray R. Transfer of training from virtual to real baseball batting. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2183–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Araújo D, Davids K. What exactly is acquired during skill acquisition? J Conscious Stud. 2011;18:7–23.

Krause L, Farrow D, Buszard T, Pinder R, Reid M. Application of representative learning design for assessment of common practice tasks in tennis. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;41:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.008.CrossRef

Pinder RA, Davids K, Renshaw I, Araújo D. Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011;33(1):146–55. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.1.146.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hadlow SM, Panchuk D, Mann DL, Portus MR, Abernethy B. Modified perceptual training in sport: a new classification framework. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(9):950–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.011.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Maloney MA, Renshaw I, Headrick J, Martin DT, Farrow D. Taekwondo fighting in training does not simulate the affective and cognitive demands of competition: implications for behavior and transfer. Front Psychol. 2018;9:25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Kittel A, Larkin P, Cunningham I, Spittle M. 360 virtual reality: a SWOT analysis in comparison to virtual reality. Front Psychol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563474.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Baños RM, Botella C, Garcia-Palacios A, Villa H, Perpiñá C, Alcaniz M. Presence and reality judgment in virtual environments: a unitary construct? Cyber Psychol Behav. 2000;3(3):327–35.CrossRef

14.

Sherman WR, Craig AB. Understanding virtual reality, interface, application and design. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2003.CrossRef

15.

Milgram P, Kishino F. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transact Inf Syst. 1994;77(12):1321–9.

16.

Craig C. Understanding perception and action in sport: how can virtual reality technology help? Sports Technol. 2013;6(4):161–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19346182.2013.855224.CrossRef

17.

McMenemy K, Ferguson S. A Hitchhiker’s guide to virtual reality. Wellesley: Peters, Limited; 2007.CrossRef

18.

Stone JA, Strafford BW, North JS, Toner C, Davids K. Effectiveness and efficiency of virtual reality designs to enhance athlete development: an ecological dynamics perspective. Move Sport Sci. 2018;102:51–60.CrossRef

19.

Milgram P, Takemura H, Utsumi A, Kishino F. Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In: Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies, vol. 2351. Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 1995. pp. 282–92.

20.

Sourin A. Case study: shared virtual and augmented environments for creative applications. In: Earnshaw R, editor. Research and development in the academy, creative industries and applications. Briefs in computer science. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 49–64.CrossRef

21.

Davids K, Otte F, Rothwel M. Adopting an ecological perspective on skill performance and learning in sport. Eur J Hum Move. 2021;46:1–3.

22.

Chow JY, Davids K, Hristovski R, Araújo D, Passos P. Nonlinear pedagogy: learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems. New Ideas Psychol. 2011;29(2):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.10.001.CrossRef

23.

Glazier PS, Davids K. Constraints on the complete optimization of human motion. Sports Med. 2009;39(1):15–28.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Newell KM. Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA, editors. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff; 1986. p. 341–60.CrossRef

25.

Davids K, Araújo D, Vilar L, Renshaw I, Pinder R. An ecological dynamics approach to skill acquisition: implications for development of talent in sport. Talent Develop Excell. 2013;5(1):21–34.

26.

Renshaw I, Davids K, Newcombe D, Roberts W. The constraints-led approach: principles for sports coaching and practice design. Routledge; 2019.CrossRef

27.

Brunswik E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1956.CrossRef

28.

Headrick J, Renshaw I, Davids K, Pinder RA, Araújo D. The dynamics of expertise acquisition in sport: the role of affective learning design. Psychol Sport Exer. 2015;16:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.006.CrossRef

29.

Woods CT, McKeown I, Rothwell M, Araújo D, Robertson S, Davids K. Sport practitioners as sport ecology designers: how ecological dynamics has progressively changed perceptions of skill “acquisition” in the sporting habitat. Front Psychol. 2020;11:654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Renshaw I, Gorman A. Challenges to capturing expertise in field settings. In: Baker J, Farrow D, editors. Routledge handbook of sport expertise. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2015. pp. 282–94.CrossRef

31.

Vilar L, Araújo D, Davids K, Renshaw I. The need for ‘representative task design’ in evaluating efficacy of skills tests in sport: a comment on Russell, Benton and Kingsley (2010). J Sports Sci. 2012;30(16):1727–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.679674.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Araújo D, Davids K, Passos P. Ecological validity, representative design, and correspondence between experimental task constraints and behavioral setting: comment on. Ecol Psychol. 2007;19(1):69–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410709336951.CrossRef

33.

Stoffregen TA, Bardy BG, Smart LJ, Pagulayan RJ. On the nature and evaluation of fidelity in virtual environments. In: Hettinger L, Haas M, editors. Virtual and adaptive environments: applications, implications, and human performance issues. London: Taylor & Francis; 2003. pp. 111–28.CrossRef

34.

Gray R. Virtual environments and their role in developing perceptual-cognitive skills in sports. In: Williams M, Jackson R, editors. Anticipation and decision making in sport. London: Routledge; 2019. pp. 342–58.CrossRef

35.

Harris DJ, Bird JM, Smart AP, Wilson MR, Vine SJ. A framework for the testing and validation of simulated environments in experimentation and training. Front Psychol. 2020;11:605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00605.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Perfect P, Timson E, White MD, Padfield GD, Erdos R, Gubbels AW. A rating scale 565 for the subjective assessment of simulation fidelity. Aeronautical J. 2014;118(1206):953–74.CrossRef

37.

Roberts PG, Guyver P, Baldwin M, Akhtar K, Alvand A, Price AJ, et al. Validation of the updated ArthroS simulator: face and construct validity of a passive haptic virtual reality simulator with novel performance metrics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(2):616–25.CrossRef

38.

Bright E, Vine S, Wilson MR, Masters RSW, McGrath JS. Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality turp simulator. Int J Surg. 2012;10:163–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.012.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Sweet R, Kowalewski T, Oppenheimer P, Weghorst S, Satava R. Face, content and construct validity of the University of Washington virtual reality transurethral prostate resection trainer. J Urol. 2004;172:1953–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000141298.06350.4c.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Vine SJ, Moore LJ, Wilson MR. Quiet eye training: the acquisition, refinement and resilient performance of targeting skills. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14:235–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.683815.CrossRef

41.

Wood G, Wright DJ, Harris D, Pal A, Franklin ZC, Vine SJ. Testing the construct validity of a soccer-specific virtual reality simulator using novice, academy, and professional soccer players. Virtual Real. 2021;25(1):43–51.CrossRef

42.

Fortes LS, Almeida SS, Praça GM, Nascimento-Júnior JR, Lima-Junior D, Barbosa BT. Virtual reality promotes greater improvements than video-stimulation screen on perceptual-cognitive skills in young soccer athletes. Hum Move Sci. 2021;79: 102856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102856.CrossRef

43.

Pagé C, Bernier PM, Trempe M. Using video simulations and virtual reality to improve decision-making skills in basketball. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(21):2403–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1638193.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Panchuk D, Klusemann MJ, Hadlow SM. Exploring the effectiveness of immersive video for training decision-making capability in elite, youth basketball players. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Harris D, Buckingham G, Wilson M, Brookes J, Mushtaq F, Mon-Williams M, et al. Testing the fidelity and validity of a virtual reality golf putting simulator. PsyarXiv. 2019a; (Preprint).

46.

Le Noury P, Buszard T, Reid M, Farrow D. Examining the representativeness of a virtual reality environment for simulation of tennis performance. J Sports Sci. 2021;39(4):412–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1823618.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Isogawa M, Mikami D, Fukuda T, Saijo N, Takahashi K, Kimata, H, et al. What can VR systems tell sports players? Reaction-based analysis of baseball batters in virtual and real worlds. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interface; 2018; p. 587–8.

48.

Adams K, Kiefer A, Panchuk D, Hunter A, MacPherson R, Spratford W. From the field of play to the laboratory: recreating the demands of competition with augmented reality simulated sport. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(5):486–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1706872.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Brault S, Bideau B, Kulpa R, Craig CM. Detecting deception in movement: the case of the side-step in rugby. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e37494.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

50.

Dessing JC, Craig CM. Bending it like Beckham: how to visually fool the goalkeeper. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10):e13161.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

51.

Tsai WL, Pan TY, Hu MC. Feasibility study on virtual reality based basketball tactic training. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020;99:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3046326.CrossRef

52.

Quadrado VH, Silva TDD, Favero FM, Tonks J, Massetti T, Monteiro CBDM. Motor learning from virtual reality to natural environments in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(1):12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1389998.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Borglund F, Young M, Eriksson J, Rasmussen A. Feedback from HTC Vive sensors results in transient performance enhancements on a juggling task in virtual reality. Sensors. 2021;21(9):2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21092966.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Tirp J, Steingröver C, Wattie N, Baker J, Schorer J. Virtual realities as optimal learning environments in sport—A transfer study of virtual and real dart throwing. Psychol Test Assess Mode. 2015;57(1):57–64.

55.

Rauter G, Sigrist R, Koch C, Crivelli F, van Raai M, Riener R, et al. Transfer of complex skill learning from virtual to real rowing. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e82145.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

56.

Juliano JM, Saldana D, Schmiesing A, Liew SL. Experience with head-mounted virtual reality (HMD-VR) predicts transfer of HMD-VR motor skills. In: 2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR); 2019 July: p. 1–2.

57.

Anglin JM, Sugiyama T, Liew SL. Visuomotor adaptation in head-mounted virtual reality versus conventional training. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–8.CrossRef

58.

Drew SA, Awad MF, Armendariz JA, Gabay B, Lachica IJ, Hinkel-Lipsker JW. The trade-off of virtual reality training for dart throwing: a facilitation of perceptual-motor learning with a detriment to performance. Front Sports Active Liv. 2020;2:59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00059.CrossRef

59.

Levac DE, Huber ME, Sternad D. Learning and transfer of complex motor skills in virtual reality: a perspective review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):1–15.CrossRef

60.

Allsop J, Gray R. Flying under pressure: effects of anxiety on attention and gaze behavior in aviation. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2014;3(2):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.010.CrossRef

61.

Bright E, Vine SJ, Dutton T, Wilson MR, McGrath JS. Visual control strategies of surgeons: a novel method of establishing the construct validity of a transurethral resection of the prostate surgical simulator. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(3):434–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.11.006.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Lele A. Virtual reality and its military utility. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. 2013;4(1):17–26.CrossRef

63.

Harris DJ, Hardcastle KJ, Wilson MR, Vine SJ. Assessing the learning and transfer of gaze behaviours in immersive virtual reality. Virtual Real. 2021;25:1–13.CrossRef

64.

65.

Salas E, Rosen MA, Held JD, Weissmuller JJ. Performance measurement in simulation-based training: a review and best practices. Simul Gaming. 2009;40(3):328–76.CrossRef

66.

Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. J Br Surg. 2004;91(2):146–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4407.CrossRef

67.

Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Crothers I, Browning J. Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR). Endoscopy. 1999;31(4):310–3.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Opdyke D, Williford JS, North M. Effectiveness of computer-generated (virtual reality) graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;1(152):626–8.

69.

Opriş D, Pintea S, García-Palacios A, Botella C, Szamosközi Ş, David D. Virtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a quantitative meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2012;29(2):85–93.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Strickland D, Hodges L, North M, Weghorst S. Overcoming phobias by virtual exposure. Commun ACM. 1997;40(8):34–9.CrossRef

71.

Rothbaum BO, Hodges L, Smith S, Lee JH, Price L. A controlled study of virtual reality exposure therapy for the fear of flying. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(6):1020.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Botella C, García-Palacios A, Villa H, Baños RM, Quero S, Alcañiz M, et al. Virtual reality exposure in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia: a controlled study. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2007;14(3):164–75.CrossRef

73.

Emmelkamp PM, Krijn M, Hulsbosch AM, De Vries S, Schuemie MJ, van der Mast CA. Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobia. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40(5):509–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00023-7.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Parsons TD, Rizzo AA. Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: a meta-analysis. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008;39(3):250–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.07.007.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Stetz MC, Kaloi-Chen JY, Turner DD, Bouchard S, Riva G, Wiederhold BK. The effectiveness of technology-enhanced relaxation techniques for military medical warriors. Mil Med. 2011;176(9):1065–70.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Pallavicini F, Argenton L, Toniazzi N, Aceti L, Mantovani F. Virtual reality applications for stress management training in the military. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016;87(12):1021–30.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Hourani LL, Kizakevich PN, Hubal R, Spira J, Strange LB, Holiday DB, et al. Predeployment stress inoculation training for primary prevention of combat-related stress disorders. J Cyberther Rehabil. 2011;4(1):101–16.

78.

Winslow B, Carroll MB, Martin JW, Surpris G, Chadderdon GL. Identification of resilient individuals and those at risk for performance deficits under stress. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00328.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Bosse T, Gerritsen C, de Man J, Treur J. Measuring stress-reducing effects of virtual training based on subjective response. In: Huang T, Zeng Z, Li C, Leung CS, editors. Neural information processing. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 322–30.CrossRef

80.

Morie J, Chance E, Buckwalter JG. Report on a preliminary study using breath control and a virtual jogging scenario as biofeedback for resilience training. In: Proceedings of the Human Computer Interaction International Conference; 2011: p. 474–80; Berlin.

81.

McLay R, Graap K, Spira J, Perlman K, Johnston S, Rothbaum B, et al. Development and testing of virtual reality exposure therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in active duty service members who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Mil Med. 2012;177(6):635–42.PubMedCrossRef

82.

Rizzo A, Hartholt A, Grimani M, Leeds A, Liewer M. Virtual reality exposure therapy for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Computer. 2014;47(7):31–7.CrossRef

83.

Nieuwenhuys A, Oudejans RR. Training with anxiety: short-and long-term effects on police officers’ shooting behavior under pressure. Cogn Process. 2011;12(3):277–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

84.

Oudejans RR, Pijpers JR. Training with mild anxiety may prevent choking under higher levels of anxiety. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.05.002.CrossRef

85.

Woods CT, Rothwell M, Rudd J, et al. Representative co-design: utilizing a source of experiential knowledge for athlete development and performance preparation. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2020;52: 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101804.CrossRef

86.

Greenhough B, Barrett S, Towlson C, Abt G. Perceptions of professional soccer coaches, support staff and players toward virtual reality and the factors that modify their intention to use it. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12): e0261378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261378.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

87.

Neumann DL, Moffitt RL, Thomas PR, Loveday K, Watling DP, Lombard C, et al. A systematic review of the application of interactive virtual reality to sport. Virtual Real. 2018;22(3):183–9.CrossRef

88.

Broadbent DP, Causer J, Williams AM, Ford PR. Perceptual-cognitive skill training and its transfer to expert performance in the field: future research directions. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(4):322–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.957727.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Abernethy B, Schorer J, Jackson RC, Hagemann N. Perceptual training methods compared: the relative efficacy of different approaches to enhancing sport-specific anticipation. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012;18:143–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028452.CrossRefPubMed

90.

Williams AM, Jackson RC. Anticipation in sport: fifty years on, what have we learned and what research still needs to be undertaken? Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;42:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.014.CrossRef

91.

Zentgraf K, Heppe H, Fleddermann MT. Training in interactive sports. Ger J Exerc Sport Res. 2017;47(1):2–14.CrossRef

92.

Harris DJ, Buckingham G, Wilson MR, Vine SJ. Virtually the same? How impaired sensory information in virtual reality may disrupt vision for action. Exp Brain Res. 2019;237(11):2761–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

93.

Wann JP, Rushton S, Mon-Williams M. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vis Res. 1995;35(19):2731–6.PubMedCrossRef

94.

Interrante V, Ries B, Anderson L. Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference; 25–29 Mar 2006; pp. 3–10; Alexandria (VA).

95.

Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mendarozqueta N, Mon-Williams M. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res. 2004;158(3):317–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1905-2.CrossRefPubMed

96.

Wijeyaratnam DO, Chua R, Cressman EK. Going offline: differences in the contributions of movement control processes when reaching in a typical versus novel environment. Exp Brain Res. 2019;237(6):1431–44.PubMedCrossRef

Title: A Narrative Review of the Current State of Extended Reality Technology and How it can be Utilised in Sport
Authors: Peter Le Noury
Remco Polman
Michael Maloney
Adam Gorman
Publication date: 14-03-2022
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Sports Medicine / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01669-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

A Narrative Review of the Current State of Extended Reality Technology and How it can be Utilised in Sport

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

Comment on “The Effect of Resistance Training on Body Composition During and After Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”

Challenging Aspects of Research on the Influence of the Menstrual Cycle and Oral Contraceptives on Physical Performance

The Effects of Trunk Muscle Training on Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance in Young and Adult Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Paradoxical Effect of Creatine Monohydrate on Muscle Damage Markers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Validity of Estimating the Maximal Oxygen Consumption by Consumer Wearables: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Expert Statement of the INTERLIVE Network

Comparison of Weightlifting, Traditional Resistance Training and Plyometrics on Strength, Power and Speed: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis