Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Research Article

Evaluating the Content of the Communication Items in the CAHPS® Clinician and Group Survey and Supplemental Items with What High-Performing Physicians Say They Do

Authors: Denise D. Quigley, Steven C. Martino, Julie A. Brown, Ron D. Hays

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A doctor’s ability to communicate effectively is key to establishing and maintaining positive doctor–patient relationships. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Survey is the standard for collecting and reporting information about patients’ experiences of care in the USA.

Objective

To evaluate how well CAHPS® Clinician and Group 2.0 core and supplemental survey items (CG-CAHPS) with a 12-month reference capture doctor–patient communication.

Data Sources/Study Setting

Eleven of the 40 highest-rated physicians on the CG-CAHPS survey treating patients in a Midwest commercial health plan.

Study Design

Data were obtained via semi-structured interviews. Specific behaviors, practices, and opinions about doctor communication were coded and compared to the CG-CAHPS items.

Principal Findings

CG-CAHPS fully captures six of the nine behaviors most commonly mentioned by high-performing physicians: employing office staff with good people skills; involving office staff in communication with patients; spending enough time with patients; listening carefully; providing clear, simple explanations; and devising an action plan with each patient. Three physician behaviors identified as key were not captured in CG-CAHPS items: use of nonverbal communication; greeting patients and introducing oneself; and tracking personal information about patients.

Conclusions

CG-CAHPS survey items capture many of the most commonly mentioned doctor–patient communication behaviors and practices identified by high-performing physicians. Nonverbal communication, greeting patients, and tracking personal information about patients were identified as key aspects of doctor–patient communication, but are not captured by the current CG-CAHPS. We recommend further research to assess patients’ perceptions of specific verbal and nonverbal behaviors (such as leaning forward in a chair, casually asking about other family members), followed by the development of new items (if needed) that aim to capture what these specific behaviors represent to patients (e.g., listens attentively, seems to care about me as a person, empathy). We also recommend including items about greeting and tracking personal information about patients in future CAHPS item sets addressing doctor–patient communication. Enriching the content of the CAHPS communication measure can help health-care organizations improve doctor–patient communication and interactions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ong LM, DeHaes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor–patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(7):903–18.PubMedCrossRef Ong LM, DeHaes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor–patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(7):903–18.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Anderson LA, Sharpe PA. Improving patient and provider communication: a synthesis and review of communication interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 1991;17:99–134.CrossRef Anderson LA, Sharpe PA. Improving patient and provider communication: a synthesis and review of communication interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 1991;17:99–134.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hulsman RL, Ros WJG, Winnubst JAM, et al. Teaching clinically experienced physicians’ communication skills: a review of evaluation studies. Med Educ. 1999;33:655–68.PubMedCrossRef Hulsman RL, Ros WJG, Winnubst JAM, et al. Teaching clinically experienced physicians’ communication skills: a review of evaluation studies. Med Educ. 1999;33:655–68.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283–7.PubMedCrossRef Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Marvel MK, Schilling R, Doherty WJ, et al. Levels of physician involvement with patients and their families: a model for teaching and research. J Fam Pract. 1994;39(6):535–44.PubMed Marvel MK, Schilling R, Doherty WJ, et al. Levels of physician involvement with patients and their families: a model for teaching and research. J Fam Pract. 1994;39(6):535–44.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Frankel RM, Stein T. Getting the most out of the clinical encounter: the four habits model. Perm J. 1999;3(3):79–88. Frankel RM, Stein T. Getting the most out of the clinical encounter: the four habits model. Perm J. 1999;3(3):79–88.
7.
go back to reference Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15:25–38.PubMed Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15:25–38.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in doctor–patient consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1516–28.PubMedCrossRef Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in doctor–patient consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1516–28.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beach MC, Inui T. Relationship-centered care. A constructive reframing. JGIM. 2006;21(Supp 1):S3–8.PubMedCrossRef Beach MC, Inui T. Relationship-centered care. A constructive reframing. JGIM. 2006;21(Supp 1):S3–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roter DL. Patient participation in patient provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977;5:281–315.PubMedCrossRef Roter DL. Patient participation in patient provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977;5:281–315.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bartlet EE, Gravson M, Barker R. The effects of physician communication skills on patient satisfaction, recall, and adherence. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37:753–64.CrossRef Bartlet EE, Gravson M, Barker R. The effects of physician communication skills on patient satisfaction, recall, and adherence. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37:753–64.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Franks P, Jerant AF, Fiscella K, et al. Studying physician effects on patient outcomes: physician interactional style and performance on quality of care indicators. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(2):422–32.PubMedCrossRef Franks P, Jerant AF, Fiscella K, et al. Studying physician effects on patient outcomes: physician interactional style and performance on quality of care indicators. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(2):422–32.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hargraves JL, Hays RD, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 Adult Core Survey. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1509–27.PubMedCrossRef Hargraves JL, Hays RD, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 Adult Core Survey. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1509–27.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tallman K, Janisse T, Frankel RM, et al. Communication practices of physicians with high patient-satisfaction ratings. Perm J. 2007;11(1):19–29.PubMedCrossRef Tallman K, Janisse T, Frankel RM, et al. Communication practices of physicians with high patient-satisfaction ratings. Perm J. 2007;11(1):19–29.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ruiz-Moral R, Perez Rodriquez E, Perula de Torres LA, et al. Physician-patient communication: a study on the observed behaviours of specialty physicians and the ways their patients perceive them. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64:242–8.PubMedCrossRef Ruiz-Moral R, Perez Rodriquez E, Perula de Torres LA, et al. Physician-patient communication: a study on the observed behaviours of specialty physicians and the ways their patients perceive them. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64:242–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sofaer S, Crofton C, Goldstein E, et al. What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals? Health Serv Res. 2005;40:2018–36.PubMedCrossRef Sofaer S, Crofton C, Goldstein E, et al. What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals? Health Serv Res. 2005;40:2018–36.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.PubMed Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Stewart MA, Brown JB, Boon H, et al. Evidence on doctor–patient communication. Cancer Prev Control. 1999;3(1):25–30.PubMed Stewart MA, Brown JB, Boon H, et al. Evidence on doctor–patient communication. Cancer Prev Control. 1999;3(1):25–30.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, et al. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357(9258):757–62.PubMedCrossRef Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, et al. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357(9258):757–62.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nagy VT. Clinician-patient communication: its big impact on health. Perm J. 2001;5(4). Nagy VT. Clinician-patient communication: its big impact on health. Perm J. 2001;5(4).
21.
go back to reference Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. JGIM. 1988;3:448–57.PubMedCrossRef Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. JGIM. 1988;3:448–57.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients, patients talking with doctors. Westport: Auburn House; 1992. Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients, patients talking with doctors. Westport: Auburn House; 1992.
23.
go back to reference Darby C, Hays RD, Kletke P. Development and evaluation of the CAHPS® Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6):1973–6.PubMedCrossRef Darby C, Hays RD, Kletke P. Development and evaluation of the CAHPS® Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6):1973–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Goldstein E, Farquhar M, Crofton C, et al. Measuring hospital care from the patients’ perspective: an overview of the CAHPS® Hospital Survey development process. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6):1977–95.PubMedCrossRef Goldstein E, Farquhar M, Crofton C, et al. Measuring hospital care from the patients’ perspective: an overview of the CAHPS® Hospital Survey development process. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6):1977–95.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The CAHPS® Connection 3(2). AHRQ Publication No. 07-0005-2-EF; 2007. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The CAHPS® Connection 3(2). AHRQ Publication No. 07-0005-2-EF; 2007.
26.
go back to reference Solomon LS, Hays RD, Zaslavsky AM, Ding L, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of a group-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) Instrument. Med Care. 2005;43(1):53–60.PubMed Solomon LS, Hays RD, Zaslavsky AM, Ding L, Cleary PD. Psychometric properties of a group-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) Instrument. Med Care. 2005;43(1):53–60.PubMed
27.
go back to reference O’Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN, et al. Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS® Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6):2162–81.PubMedCrossRef O’Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN, et al. Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS® Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6):2162–81.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Martino SC, Elliott MN, Cleary PD, et al. Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess Medicare beneficiaries’ prescription drug plan experiences. Health Care Financ Rev. 2009;30(3):41–53.PubMed Martino SC, Elliott MN, Cleary PD, et al. Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess Medicare beneficiaries’ prescription drug plan experiences. Health Care Financ Rev. 2009;30(3):41–53.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003;15:85–109.CrossRef Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003;15:85–109.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference de Vries H, Elliott MN, Kanouse DE, et al. Using pooled kappa to summarize inter-rater agreement across many items. Field Methods. 2008;20:272–82.CrossRef de Vries H, Elliott MN, Kanouse DE, et al. Using pooled kappa to summarize inter-rater agreement across many items. Field Methods. 2008;20:272–82.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mast MS. On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):315–8.PubMedCrossRef Mast MS. On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):315–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference DiMatteo MR, Taranta A, Friedman HS, et al. Predicting patient satisfaction from physicians’ nonverbal communication skills. Med Care. 1980;18(4):376–87.PubMedCrossRef DiMatteo MR, Taranta A, Friedman HS, et al. Predicting patient satisfaction from physicians’ nonverbal communication skills. Med Care. 1980;18(4):376–87.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference DiMatteo MR, Hays RD, Prince LM. Relationship of physicians’ nonverbal communication skill to patient satisfaction, appointment noncompliance, and physician workload. Health Psychol. 2006;5(6):581–94.CrossRef DiMatteo MR, Hays RD, Prince LM. Relationship of physicians’ nonverbal communication skill to patient satisfaction, appointment noncompliance, and physician workload. Health Psychol. 2006;5(6):581–94.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Laidlaw TS, Kaufman DM, Sargeant J, et al. What makes a physician an exemplary communicator with patients? Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68:153–60.PubMedCrossRef Laidlaw TS, Kaufman DM, Sargeant J, et al. What makes a physician an exemplary communicator with patients? Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68:153–60.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hall JA, Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R. Nonverbal behavior in clinical-patient interaction. Appl Prev Psychol. 1995;4:21–37.CrossRef Hall JA, Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R. Nonverbal behavior in clinical-patient interaction. Appl Prev Psychol. 1995;4:21–37.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Griffith CH, Wison JF, Langer S, et al. House staff nonverbal communication skills and standardized patient satisfaction. JGIM. 2003;18:170–4.PubMedCrossRef Griffith CH, Wison JF, Langer S, et al. House staff nonverbal communication skills and standardized patient satisfaction. JGIM. 2003;18:170–4.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, et al. Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychol. 1994;13(5):384–92.PubMedCrossRef Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, et al. Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychol. 1994;13(5):384–92.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Mast MS, Hall JA, Roter DL. Disentangling physician sex and physician communication style: their effects on patient satisfaction in a virtual medical visit. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(1):16–22.CrossRef Mast MS, Hall JA, Roter DL. Disentangling physician sex and physician communication style: their effects on patient satisfaction in a virtual medical visit. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(1):16–22.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bensing JM, Dronkers J. Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behavior. Med Care. 1992;30:283–98.PubMedCrossRef Bensing JM, Dronkers J. Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behavior. Med Care. 1992;30:283–98.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Evans RW, Evans RI, Sharp MJ. The physician survey on the post-concussion and whiplash syndromes. Headache. 1994;34:268–74.PubMedCrossRef Evans RW, Evans RI, Sharp MJ. The physician survey on the post-concussion and whiplash syndromes. Headache. 1994;34:268–74.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Hyman DJ, Pavlik VN. Self-reported hypertension treatment practices among primary care physicians: blood pressure thresholds, drug choices, and the role of guidelines and evidence-based medicine. Arch Int Med. 2000;16(15):2281.CrossRef Hyman DJ, Pavlik VN. Self-reported hypertension treatment practices among primary care physicians: blood pressure thresholds, drug choices, and the role of guidelines and evidence-based medicine. Arch Int Med. 2000;16(15):2281.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Squires D, Peugh J, Applebaum S. A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 209: perspectives on care, costs and experiences. Health Affairs. 2009;28(6):w1171–83.PubMedCrossRef Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Squires D, Peugh J, Applebaum S. A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 209: perspectives on care, costs and experiences. Health Affairs. 2009;28(6):w1171–83.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the Content of the Communication Items in the CAHPS® Clinician and Group Survey and Supplemental Items with What High-Performing Physicians Say They Do
Authors
Denise D. Quigley
Steven C. Martino
Julie A. Brown
Ron D. Hays
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-013-0016-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.