Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 3/2021

01-06-2021 | Metastasis | Original Article

Major robotic hepatectomies: technical considerations

Authors: Paolo Magistri, Giacomo Assirati, Roberto Ballarin, Stefano Di Sandro, Fabrizio Di Benedetto

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic approach to the liver may allow to perform difficult resections with a minimally invasive strategy in an easier way as compared to standard laparoscopy. The aim of this study is to review our experience with robotic major hepatectomies, reporting technical considerations, and describing the outcomes of patients that underwent either left (LRH) or right robotic hepatectomy (RRH). Our prospectively maintained database was screened to identify all patients that received a major liver resection for benign or malignant disease. Preoperative data and postoperative short-term and long-term outcomes were reported. 261 robotic procedures were performed in our Center between May 2014 and October 2020. 12 patients underwent robotic left hepatectomy (RLH) and 10 patients were treated by robotic right hepatectomy (RRH). In the RLH group, median operative time (OT) was 383 min, median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 300 ml, and median in-hospital stay was of 3 days. In the RRH group, median OT was 490 min, median EBL 725 ml, and median hospital stay was 5 days. Although one of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery is to obtain radical resections with parenchyma sparing strategies, patients that need a major hepatectomy may benefit of a robotic resection with good postoperative outcomes. Team learning curve and growth instead of personal progression is crucial to expand the limits of novel surgical techniques.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777CrossRef Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Aldrighetti L, Sutcliffe RP (2020) A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 46(7):1214–1224CrossRef Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Aldrighetti L, Sutcliffe RP (2020) A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 46(7):1214–1224CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY, Fong AKW, Cheung YS, Wong J et al (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc 34(5):2000–2006CrossRef Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY, Fong AKW, Cheung YS, Wong J et al (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc 34(5):2000–2006CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):745–753CrossRef Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):745–753CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boggi U, Caniglia F, Amorese G (2014) Laparoscopic robot-assisted major hepatectomy. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):3–10CrossRef Boggi U, Caniglia F, Amorese G (2014) Laparoscopic robot-assisted major hepatectomy. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):3–10CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yoh T, Cauchy F, Kawai T, Schneck AS, Le Roy B, Goumard C et al (2020) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy using the caudal approach is superior to open right hepatectomy with anterior approach and liver hanging maneuver: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 34(2):636–645CrossRef Yoh T, Cauchy F, Kawai T, Schneck AS, Le Roy B, Goumard C et al (2020) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy using the caudal approach is superior to open right hepatectomy with anterior approach and liver hanging maneuver: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 34(2):636–645CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pang YY, Strasberg SM (2002) The brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000; 2:333‐39. HPB. 4(2):99–100. Pang YY, Strasberg SM (2002) The brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000; 2:333‐39. HPB. 4(2):99–100.
8.
go back to reference Magistri P, Tarantino G, Guidetti C, Assirati G, Olivieri T, Ballarin R et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first 46 consecutive cases. J Surg Res 217:92–99 Magistri P, Tarantino G, Guidetti C, Assirati G, Olivieri T, Ballarin R et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first 46 consecutive cases. J Surg Res 217:92–99
9.
go back to reference Magistri P, Pecchi A, Franceschini E, Pesi B, Guadagni S, Catellani B et al (2019) Not just minor resections: robotic approach for cystic echinococcosis of the liver. Infection 47(6):973–979CrossRef Magistri P, Pecchi A, Franceschini E, Pesi B, Guadagni S, Catellani B et al (2019) Not just minor resections: robotic approach for cystic echinococcosis of the liver. Infection 47(6):973–979CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Di Benedetto F, Tarantino G, Magistri P (2019) Chasing the right path: tips, tricks and challenges of robotic approach to posterior segments. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 8(5):512–514CrossRef Di Benedetto F, Tarantino G, Magistri P (2019) Chasing the right path: tips, tricks and challenges of robotic approach to posterior segments. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 8(5):512–514CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Di Benedetto F, Magistri P (2020) First case of full robotic ALPPS for srcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. Di Benedetto F, Magistri P (2020) First case of full robotic ALPPS for srcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol.
13.
go back to reference Guerrini GP, Pinelli D, Di Benedetto F, Marini E, Corno V, Guizzetti M et al (2016) Predictive value of nodule size and differentiation in HCC recurrence after liver transplantation. Surg Oncol 25(4):419–428CrossRef Guerrini GP, Pinelli D, Di Benedetto F, Marini E, Corno V, Guizzetti M et al (2016) Predictive value of nodule size and differentiation in HCC recurrence after liver transplantation. Surg Oncol 25(4):419–428CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Magistri P, Tarantino G, Assirati G, Olivieri T, Catellani B, Guerrini GP, Ballarin R, Di Benedetto F (2019) Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 15(4):e2004CrossRef Magistri P, Tarantino G, Assirati G, Olivieri T, Catellani B, Guerrini GP, Ballarin R, Di Benedetto F (2019) Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 15(4):e2004CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chen P-D, Wu C-Y, Hu R-H, Chou W-H, Lai H-S, Liang J-T, et al. (2016) Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol. Chen P-D, Wu C-Y, Hu R-H, Chou W-H, Lai H-S, Liang J-T, et al. (2016) Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol.
16.
go back to reference Magistri P, Guerrini GP, Ballarin R, Assirati G, Tarantino G, Di Benedetto F (2019) Improving outcomes defending patient safety: the learning journey in robotic liver resections. BioMed Res Int 2019:1835085CrossRef Magistri P, Guerrini GP, Ballarin R, Assirati G, Tarantino G, Di Benedetto F (2019) Improving outcomes defending patient safety: the learning journey in robotic liver resections. BioMed Res Int 2019:1835085CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chen P-D, Wu C-Y, Hu R-H, Chen C-N, Yuan R-H, Liang J-T et al (2017) Robotic major hepatectomy: is there a learning curve? Surgery 161(3):642–649CrossRef Chen P-D, Wu C-Y, Hu R-H, Chen C-N, Yuan R-H, Liang J-T et al (2017) Robotic major hepatectomy: is there a learning curve? Surgery 161(3):642–649CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Di Benedetto F, Petrowsky H, Magistri P, Halazun KJ (2020) Robotic liver resection: hurdles and beyond. Int J Surg 82S:155–162CrossRef Di Benedetto F, Petrowsky H, Magistri P, Halazun KJ (2020) Robotic liver resection: hurdles and beyond. Int J Surg 82S:155–162CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lai ECH, Tang CN (2017) Training robotic hepatectomy: the Hong Kong experience and perspective. Hepatob Surg Nutr 6(4):222–229CrossRef Lai ECH, Tang CN (2017) Training robotic hepatectomy: the Hong Kong experience and perspective. Hepatob Surg Nutr 6(4):222–229CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chen P-D, Hu R-H, Liang J-T, Huang C-S, Wu Y-M (2019) Toward a fully robotic surgery: performing robotic major liver resection with no table-side surgeon. Int J Med Robot 15(2):e1985CrossRef Chen P-D, Hu R-H, Liang J-T, Huang C-S, Wu Y-M (2019) Toward a fully robotic surgery: performing robotic major liver resection with no table-side surgeon. Int J Med Robot 15(2):e1985CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wang W-H, Kuo K-K, Wang S-N, Lee K-T (2018) Oncological and surgical result of hepatoma after robot surgery. Surg Endosc 32(9):3918–3924CrossRef Wang W-H, Kuo K-K, Wang S-N, Lee K-T (2018) Oncological and surgical result of hepatoma after robot surgery. Surg Endosc 32(9):3918–3924CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Beard RE, Khan S, Troisi RI, Montalti R, Vanlander A, Fong Y, Kingham TP, Boerner T, Berber E, Kahramangil B, Buell JF, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Shen C, Molinari M, Geller DA, Tsung A (2020) Long-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg 44(3):887–895CrossRef Beard RE, Khan S, Troisi RI, Montalti R, Vanlander A, Fong Y, Kingham TP, Boerner T, Berber E, Kahramangil B, Buell JF, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Shen C, Molinari M, Geller DA, Tsung A (2020) Long-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg 44(3):887–895CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Guerra F, Guadagni S, Pesi B, Furbetta N, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, et al. (2019) Outcomes of robotic liver resections for colorectal liver metastases. A multi-institutional analysis of minimally invasive ultrasound-guided robotic surgery. Surg Oncol 28:14–8. Guerra F, Guadagni S, Pesi B, Furbetta N, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, et al. (2019) Outcomes of robotic liver resections for colorectal liver metastases. A multi-institutional analysis of minimally invasive ultrasound-guided robotic surgery. Surg Oncol 28:14–8.
24.
go back to reference Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M et al Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100(7):917–925 Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M et al Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100(7):917–925
25.
go back to reference Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Menonna F, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Campani D et al (2016) Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(8):1111–1122CrossRef Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Menonna F, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Campani D et al (2016) Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(8):1111–1122CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, Tang M, Li H, Leng J, Meng X, Dong J (2016) Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 30(7):3060–3070CrossRef Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, Tang M, Li H, Leng J, Meng X, Dong J (2016) Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 30(7):3060–3070CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Liu QD, Chen JZ, Xu XY, Zhang T, Zhou NX (2012) Incidence of port-site metastasis after undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies. World J Gastroenterol 18(40):5695–5701CrossRef Liu QD, Chen JZ, Xu XY, Zhang T, Zhou NX (2012) Incidence of port-site metastasis after undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies. World J Gastroenterol 18(40):5695–5701CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Vicente E, Quijano Y, Ielpo B, Fabra I (2016) First ALPPS procedure using a total robotic approach. Surg Oncol 25(4):457CrossRef Vicente E, Quijano Y, Ielpo B, Fabra I (2016) First ALPPS procedure using a total robotic approach. Surg Oncol 25(4):457CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Machado MAC, Surjan RC, Makdissi F (2020) Robotic ALPPS. Ann Surg Oncol 27(4):1174–1179CrossRef Machado MAC, Surjan RC, Makdissi F (2020) Robotic ALPPS. Ann Surg Oncol 27(4):1174–1179CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Di Benedetto F, Assirati G, Magistri P (2020) Full robotic ALPPS for HCC with intrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS 16(2):e2087 Di Benedetto F, Assirati G, Magistri P (2020) Full robotic ALPPS for HCC with intrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS 16(2):e2087
31.
go back to reference Chen P-D, Wu C-Y, Hu R-H, Ho C-M, Lee P-H, Lai H-S et al (2016) Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: a pure, minimally invasive approach. Liver Trans Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc 22(11):1509–1518 Chen P-D, Wu C-Y, Hu R-H, Ho C-M, Lee P-H, Lai H-S et al (2016) Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: a pure, minimally invasive approach. Liver Trans Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc 22(11):1509–1518
32.
go back to reference Di Benedetto F, Magistri P (2020) ASO Author reflections: robotic ALPPS: the future is coming. Ann Surg Oncol Di Benedetto F, Magistri P (2020) ASO Author reflections: robotic ALPPS: the future is coming. Ann Surg Oncol
33.
go back to reference Magistri P, Olivieri T, Assirati G, Guerrini GP, Ballarin R, Tarantino G et al (2019) Robotic liver resection expands the opportunities of bridging before liver transplantation. Liver Trans Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Trans Soc 25(7):1110–1112 Magistri P, Olivieri T, Assirati G, Guerrini GP, Ballarin R, Tarantino G et al (2019) Robotic liver resection expands the opportunities of bridging before liver transplantation. Liver Trans Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Trans Soc 25(7):1110–1112
34.
35.
go back to reference Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, Caniglia F, Laurenzi A, Puleo F et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979CrossRef Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, Caniglia F, Laurenzi A, Puleo F et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Major robotic hepatectomies: technical considerations
Authors
Paolo Magistri
Giacomo Assirati
Roberto Ballarin
Stefano Di Sandro
Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00940-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Updates in Surgery 3/2021 Go to the issue