Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 2/2019

01-06-2019 | Colectomy | Original Article

Colorectal surgery in Italy: a snapshot from the iCral study group

Author: The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

During a recent prospective trial on early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery, we gathered a large database on more than 1500 procedures performed in 19 surgical centers in Italy over a 12-month period. Main purpose of the present paper is to show the epidemiological data about colorectal procedures and anastomotic leakage. Prospective enrollment for all elective colorectal resections with anastomosis (September 2017–September 2018). Primary endpoint was AL; secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality rates, readmission and reoperation rates, and length of post-operative hospital stay (ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT03560180). There were 1546 enrolled cases (56.9% of 2717 total resected cases). The rate of minimally invasive resections was 83.5%. Overall AL rate was 4.92% (76 cases; range per center 0-12.12%). Mean ± SD time to AL diagnosis was 5.95 ± 4.78 days (median 5, range 1-31). Overall morbidity rate was 30.20%, mortality 1.29% (20 cases; range per center 0-3.27), readmission 0.90%, and reoperation 6.92%. Mean ± SD post-operative LOS was 7.89 ± 5.97 days (median 6; range 1-120). AL significantly influenced all other secondary endpoints. This study offers a good snapshot of colorectal resections in Italy. There was a high rate of laparoscopic resections, reflecting the special interest in this kind of surgery by the participating centers. AL, morbidity, mortality, readmission and reoperation rates are compared to those reported in previous population-based studies. Compared to series dealing with open colorectal resections, the time to diagnosis of AL was shortened by several days.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Slieker JC, Komen N, Mannaerts GH, Karsten TM, Willemsen P, Murawska M, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2012) Long-term and perioperative corticosteroids in anastomotic leakage: a prospective study of 259 left-sided colorectal anastomoses. Arch Surg 147:447–452CrossRefPubMed Slieker JC, Komen N, Mannaerts GH, Karsten TM, Willemsen P, Murawska M, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2012) Long-term and perioperative corticosteroids in anastomotic leakage: a prospective study of 259 left-sided colorectal anastomoses. Arch Surg 147:447–452CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208:269–278CrossRefPubMed Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208:269–278CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA (2007) Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it’s later than you think. Ann Surg 245:254–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA (2007) Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it’s later than you think. Ann Surg 245:254–258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG (2001) Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1157–1168CrossRefPubMed Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG (2001) Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1157–1168CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SI, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 257:665–671CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SI, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 257:665–671CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Russ A, Kennedy GD (2016) Postoperative complications. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Read TE, Saclarides TJ, Senagore AJ, Whitlow CB (eds) ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery, 3rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 121–140CrossRef Russ A, Kennedy GD (2016) Postoperative complications. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Read TE, Saclarides TJ, Senagore AJ, Whitlow CB (eds) ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery, 3rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 121–140CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G (2007) The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:71–79CrossRefPubMed Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G (2007) The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:71–79CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Giaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Cunsolo GV, Sparagna A, Antonelli MS, Nigri G, Balducci G, Ziparo V (2014) Procalcitonin, as an early biomarker of colorectal anastomotic leak, facilitates enhanced recovery after surgery. J Crit Care 29:528–532CrossRefPubMed Giaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Cunsolo GV, Sparagna A, Antonelli MS, Nigri G, Balducci G, Ziparo V (2014) Procalcitonin, as an early biomarker of colorectal anastomotic leak, facilitates enhanced recovery after surgery. J Crit Care 29:528–532CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ortega-Deballon P, Radais F, Facy O, d’Athis P, Masson D, Charles PE, Cheynel N, Favre JP, Rat P (2010) C-reactive protein is an early predictor of septic complications after elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 34:808–814CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ortega-Deballon P, Radais F, Facy O, d’Athis P, Masson D, Charles PE, Cheynel N, Favre JP, Rat P (2010) C-reactive protein is an early predictor of septic complications after elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 34:808–814CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Oberhofer D, Juras J, Pavicić AM, Rancić Zurić I, Rumenjak V (2012) Comparison of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin as predictors of postoperative infectious complications after elective colorectal surgery. Croat Med J 53:612–619CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oberhofer D, Juras J, Pavicić AM, Rancić Zurić I, Rumenjak V (2012) Comparison of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin as predictors of postoperative infectious complications after elective colorectal surgery. Croat Med J 53:612–619CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER, Brouwers MA, van der Vlies CH, Oostenbroek RJ, Menon AG, Steup WH, van de Velde CJ (2009) Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:420–426CrossRef den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER, Brouwers MA, van der Vlies CH, Oostenbroek RJ, Menon AG, Steup WH, van de Velde CJ (2009) Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:420–426CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Benedetti M, Pergolini I, Ciano P et al (2019) Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by the Dutch leakage score, serum procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein: study protocol of a prospective observational validation study by the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group. G Chir 40:20–25PubMed Benedetti M, Pergolini I, Ciano P et al (2019) Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by the Dutch leakage score, serum procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein: study protocol of a prospective observational validation study by the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group. G Chir 40:20–25PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, Thomas DR, Anthony P, Charlton KE, Maggio M, Tsai AC, Grathwohl D, Vellas B, Sieber CC, MNA-International Group (2009) Validation of the mini nutritional assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 13:782–788CrossRefPubMed Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, Thomas DR, Anthony P, Charlton KE, Maggio M, Tsai AC, Grathwohl D, Vellas B, Sieber CC, MNA-International Group (2009) Validation of the mini nutritional assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 13:782–788CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Skipper A, Ferguson M, Thompson K, Castellanos VH, Porcari J (2012) Nutrition screening tools: an analysis of the evidence. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36:292–298CrossRefPubMed Skipper A, Ferguson M, Thompson K, Castellanos VH, Porcari J (2012) Nutrition screening tools: an analysis of the evidence. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36:292–298CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: 5-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: 5-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608CrossRefPubMed Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432CrossRefPubMed Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JWC (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725CrossRef Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JWC (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, Bracale U (2018) Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 24:2247–2260CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, Bracale U (2018) Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 24:2247–2260CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Gessler B, Eriksson O, Angenete A (2017) Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:549–556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gessler B, Eriksson O, Angenete A (2017) Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:549–556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JL, Granero-Castro P, Hervás D, Alvarez Rico MA, Brao MJ, Sánchez González JM, Garcia-Granero E, ANACO Study Group (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330CrossRefPubMed Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JL, Granero-Castro P, Hervás D, Alvarez Rico MA, Brao MJ, Sánchez González JM, Garcia-Granero E, ANACO Study Group (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR, Atkinson SJ, Abbott DE, Shah SA, Paquette IM (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338CrossRefPubMed Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR, Atkinson SJ, Abbott DE, Shah SA, Paquette IM (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Brescia A, Tomassini F, Berardi G, Sebastiani C, Pezzatini M, Dall’Oglio A, Laracca GG, Apponi F, Gasparrini M (2017) Development of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of the first 120 consecutive cases from a university hospital. Updates Surg 69:359–365CrossRefPubMed Brescia A, Tomassini F, Berardi G, Sebastiani C, Pezzatini M, Dall’Oglio A, Laracca GG, Apponi F, Gasparrini M (2017) Development of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of the first 120 consecutive cases from a university hospital. Updates Surg 69:359–365CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Braga M, Beretta L, Pecorelli N, Maspero M, Casiraghi U, Borghi F, Pellegrino L, Bona S, Monzani R, Ferrari G, Radrizzani D, Iuliani R, Bima C, Scatizzi M, Missana G, Guicciardi MA, Muratore A, Crespi M, Bouzari H, Ceretti AP, Ficari F, PeriOperative Italian Society Group (2018) Enhanced recovery pathway in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: is there an effect of increasing ages? Results from the perioperative Italian Society Registry. Updates Surg 70:7–13CrossRefPubMed Braga M, Beretta L, Pecorelli N, Maspero M, Casiraghi U, Borghi F, Pellegrino L, Bona S, Monzani R, Ferrari G, Radrizzani D, Iuliani R, Bima C, Scatizzi M, Missana G, Guicciardi MA, Muratore A, Crespi M, Bouzari H, Ceretti AP, Ficari F, PeriOperative Italian Society Group (2018) Enhanced recovery pathway in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: is there an effect of increasing ages? Results from the perioperative Italian Society Registry. Updates Surg 70:7–13CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Colorectal surgery in Italy: a snapshot from the iCral study group
Author
The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-00612-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Updates in Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue