Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 2/2016

01-06-2016 | Position Paper

Esophageal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it

Authors: Paolo Parise, Ugo Elmore, Uberto Fumagalli, Giovanni De Manzoni, Simone Giacopuzzi, Riccardo Rosati

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Esophageal cancer incidence is rapidly increasing in the western countries. Adenocarcinoma has recently become the most frequent subtype because of the changes in lifestyle. As observed for other types of surgery, even for esophageal surgery better results have been observed in centers with high volume of activity. Countries with formal policies of centralization, as Great Britain and The Netherlands, have got lower mortality and longer survival than those obtained before the centralization program introduction and of those countries without centralization programs. However, concerns about accessibility to high volume hospitals for lower level social strata have emerged in different countries. In Italy most of the esophagectomies for cancer are performed in very low volume centers with limited experience. High volume centers with >20 cases/year are few but, even if managing patients with more severe comorbidities have got a lower mortality and a shorter length of stay. The Aim of this paper is to identify the organizational, structural and volume requirements for accreditation of a center as an esophageal surgery center. Special attention must be given to a multidisciplinary approach involving different highly skilled specialists with the creation of a multidisciplinary team and individualized diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bollschweiller E, Wolfgarten E, Gutschow C et al (2001) Demographic variations in the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males. Cancer 92:549–555CrossRef Bollschweiller E, Wolfgarten E, Gutschow C et al (2001) Demographic variations in the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males. Cancer 92:549–555CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pohl H, Welch HG (2005) The role of over diagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:142–146CrossRefPubMed Pohl H, Welch HG (2005) The role of over diagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:142–146CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150CrossRefPubMed Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Glickmann JN (2003) Section II: pathology and pathologic staging of esophageal cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15:167–179CrossRef Glickmann JN (2003) Section II: pathology and pathologic staging of esophageal cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15:167–179CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R et al (2004) Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 91:943–947CrossRefPubMed Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R et al (2004) Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 91:943–947CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kohn GP, Galanko JA, Meyers MO et al (2009) National trends in esophageal surgery: are outcomes as good as we believe? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1900–1910CrossRefPubMed Kohn GP, Galanko JA, Meyers MO et al (2009) National trends in esophageal surgery: are outcomes as good as we believe? J Gastrointest Surg 13:1900–1910CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ngpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRef Ngpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A et al (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 16:486–494CrossRefPubMed Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 16:486–494CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 301:1364–1369CrossRefPubMed Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 301:1364–1369CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S et al (2012) Volume-outcome relationship in surgey for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1055–1063 Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S et al (2012) Volume-outcome relationship in surgey for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1055–1063
12.
go back to reference Wouters MW, Wijnhoven BP, Karim-Kos HE et al (2007) High-volume vs low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustment based on clinical data. Ann Surg Oncol 15:80–87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wouters MW, Wijnhoven BP, Karim-Kos HE et al (2007) High-volume vs low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustment based on clinical data. Ann Surg Oncol 15:80–87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Finley CJ, Jacks L, Keshavjee S et al (2011) The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a canadian national study. Ann Thorac Surg 92:485–490CrossRefPubMed Finley CJ, Jacks L, Keshavjee S et al (2011) The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a canadian national study. Ann Thorac Surg 92:485–490CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference So YK, Jong HP, Sung GK et al (2010) Disparities in utilization of high-volume hospitals for cancer surgery: results of a Korean population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2806–2815CrossRef So YK, Jong HP, Sung GK et al (2010) Disparities in utilization of high-volume hospitals for cancer surgery: results of a Korean population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2806–2815CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Munasinghe A, Markar SR, Mamidann R et al (2015) Is time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcome of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg 262:79–85CrossRefPubMed Munasinghe A, Markar SR, Mamidann R et al (2015) Is time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcome of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg 262:79–85CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wouters MW, Karim-Kos HE, le Cessie HE et al (2009) Centralization of esophageal cancer Surgery: does it improve clinical outcome? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1789–1798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wouters MW, Karim-Kos HE, le Cessie HE et al (2009) Centralization of esophageal cancer Surgery: does it improve clinical outcome? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1789–1798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Henneman D, Dikken JL, Putter H et al (2014) Centralization of esophagectomy: how far should we go? Ann Surg Oncol 21:4068–4074CrossRefPubMed Henneman D, Dikken JL, Putter H et al (2014) Centralization of esophagectomy: how far should we go? Ann Surg Oncol 21:4068–4074CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Meguid RA, Weiss ES, Chang DC et al (2009) The effect of volume on esophageal cancer resections: what constitutes acceptable resection volumes for centers of excellence? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:23–29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meguid RA, Weiss ES, Chang DC et al (2009) The effect of volume on esophageal cancer resections: what constitutes acceptable resection volumes for centers of excellence? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:23–29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Palser TR, Cromwell DA, Hardwick RH et al (2009) Re-organization of oesophago-gastric cancer care in England: progress and remaining challenges. BMC Health Serv Res. 12(9):204. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-204 CrossRef Palser TR, Cromwell DA, Hardwick RH et al (2009) Re-organization of oesophago-gastric cancer care in England: progress and remaining challenges. BMC Health Serv Res. 12(9):204. doi:10.​1186/​1472-6963-9-204 CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fumagalli U, Bersani M, Russo A et al (2013) Volume and outcome after esophageal cancer surgery: the experience of the Region of Lombardy—Italy. Updates Surg 65:271–275CrossRefPubMed Fumagalli U, Bersani M, Russo A et al (2013) Volume and outcome after esophageal cancer surgery: the experience of the Region of Lombardy—Italy. Updates Surg 65:271–275CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Esophageal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it
Authors
Paolo Parise
Ugo Elmore
Uberto Fumagalli
Giovanni De Manzoni
Simone Giacopuzzi
Riccardo Rosati
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0374-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Updates in Surgery 2/2016 Go to the issue

Acknowledgement to Referees

Referees 2015