Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 2/2015

01-06-2015 | Review Article

The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection

Authors: Daisuke Ban, Atsushi Kudo, Hiromitsu Ito, Yusuke Mitsunori, Satoshi Matsumura, Arihiro Aihara, Takanori Ochiai, Shinji Tanaka, Minoru Tanabe, Osamu Itano, Hironori Kaneko, Go Wakabayashi

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Grading of difficulty is needed for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Indications for LLR are expanding worldwide from minor to major resections, particularly in institutions having surgeons with advanced skills. If the degrees of surgical difficulty were defined, it would serve as a useful guide when introducing LLR and stepping up to the more advanced LLR. As no previous study has addressed the degrees of difficulty of various LLR procedures, we devised a practical scoring system for this purpose. We extracted the following five factors from preoperative information to score difficulty levels: (1) tumor location, (2) extent of liver resection, (3) tumor size, (4) proximity to major vessels, and (5) liver function. This difficulty index is comprised of the cumulative score for the five individual factors. There has not yet been a standard definition of difficulty. Our proposed scoring system might be a practical means of assessing the difficulty of LLR procedures. However, this system must be prospectively validated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Troisi RI, Montalti R, Van Limmen JGM et al (2014) Risk factors and management of conversions to an open approach in laparoscopic liver resection: analysis of 265 consecutive cases. HPB 16(1):75–82PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Troisi RI, Montalti R, Van Limmen JGM et al (2014) Risk factors and management of conversions to an open approach in laparoscopic liver resection: analysis of 265 consecutive cases. HPB 16(1):75–82PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C (1997) The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 87(6):1290–1297PubMedCrossRef Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C (1997) The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 87(6):1290–1297PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Osborne SA, Severn P, Bunce CV, Fraser SG (2006) The use of a pre-operative scoring system for the prediction of phacoemulsification case difficulty and the selection of appropriate cases to be performed by trainees. BMC Ophthalmol 6:38PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Osborne SA, Severn P, Bunce CV, Fraser SG (2006) The use of a pre-operative scoring system for the prediction of phacoemulsification case difficulty and the selection of appropriate cases to be performed by trainees. BMC Ophthalmol 6:38PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Collado V, Nicolas E, Hennequin M (2008) Dental difficulty for adult patients undergoing different dental procedures according to level of dental anxiety. Odontostomatol Trop 31(124):35–42PubMed Collado V, Nicolas E, Hennequin M (2008) Dental difficulty for adult patients undergoing different dental procedures according to level of dental anxiety. Odontostomatol Trop 31(124):35–42PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lee Iv MK, Gao F, Strasberg SM (2015) Perceived complexity of various liver resections: results of a survey of experts with development of a complexity score and classification. J Am Coll Surg 220(1):64–69CrossRef Lee Iv MK, Gao F, Strasberg SM (2015) Perceived complexity of various liver resections: results of a survey of experts with development of a complexity score and classification. J Am Coll Surg 220(1):64–69CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Beller S, Eulenstein S, Lange T, Niederstrasser M, Hünerbein M, Schlag PM (2009) A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO) 35(1):59–64CrossRef Beller S, Eulenstein S, Lange T, Niederstrasser M, Hünerbein M, Schlag PM (2009) A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol (EJSO) 35(1):59–64CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hansen C, Zidowitz S, Ritter F, Lange C, Oldhafer K, Hahn HK (2013) Risk maps for liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(3):419–428PubMedCrossRef Hansen C, Zidowitz S, Ritter F, Lange C, Oldhafer K, Hahn HK (2013) Risk maps for liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(3):419–428PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference J-h Ai, J-w Li, Chen J, Bie P, S-g Wang, Zheng S-G (2013) feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor size of 5–10 cm. PLoS One 8(8):e72328CrossRef J-h Ai, J-w Li, Chen J, Bie P, S-g Wang, Zheng S-G (2013) feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor size of 5–10 cm. PLoS One 8(8):e72328CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shelat V, Cipriani F, Basseres T, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Pearce N, AbuHilal M (2015) Pure laparoscopic liver resection for large malignant tumors: does size matter? Ann Surg Oncol 22(4):1288–1293PubMedCrossRef Shelat V, Cipriani F, Basseres T, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Pearce N, AbuHilal M (2015) Pure laparoscopic liver resection for large malignant tumors: does size matter? Ann Surg Oncol 22(4):1288–1293PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cho JY, Han H-S, Yoon Y-S, Shin S-H (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144(1):32–38PubMedCrossRef Cho JY, Han H-S, Yoon Y-S, Shin S-H (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144(1):32–38PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Xiang L, Xiao L, Li J, Chen J, Fan Y, Zheng S (2015) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterosuperior liver segments. World J Surg 39(5):1202–1209PubMedCrossRef Xiang L, Xiao L, Li J, Chen J, Fan Y, Zheng S (2015) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterosuperior liver segments. World J Surg 39(5):1202–1209PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sarpel U, Hefti MM, Wisnievsky JP, Roayaie S, Schwartz ME, Labow DM (2009) Outcome for patients treated with laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1572–1577PubMedCrossRef Sarpel U, Hefti MM, Wisnievsky JP, Roayaie S, Schwartz ME, Labow DM (2009) Outcome for patients treated with laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1572–1577PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):745–753PubMedCrossRef Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):745–753PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hibi T, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Itano O, Kitagawa Y, Wakabayashi G (2014) International survey on technical aspects of laparoscopic liver resection: a web-based study on the global diffusion of laparoscopic liver surgery prior to the 2nd international consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection in Iwate, Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):737–744PubMedCrossRef Hibi T, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Itano O, Kitagawa Y, Wakabayashi G (2014) International survey on technical aspects of laparoscopic liver resection: a web-based study on the global diffusion of laparoscopic liver surgery prior to the 2nd international consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection in Iwate, Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):737–744PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Farges O, Goutte N, Dokmak S et al (2014) How surgical technology translates into practice: the model of laparoscopic liver resections performed in France. Ann Surg 260(5):916–921PubMedCrossRef Farges O, Goutte N, Dokmak S et al (2014) How surgical technology translates into practice: the model of laparoscopic liver resections performed in France. Ann Surg 260(5):916–921PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Glarner CE, McDonald RJ, Smith AB et al (2013) Utilizing a novel tool for the comprehensive assessment of resident operative performance. J Surg Edu 70(6):813–820CrossRef Glarner CE, McDonald RJ, Smith AB et al (2013) Utilizing a novel tool for the comprehensive assessment of resident operative performance. J Surg Edu 70(6):813–820CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Larson JL, Williams RG, Ketchum J, Boehler ML, Dunnington GL (2005) Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents. Surgery 138(4):640–647PubMedCrossRef Larson JL, Williams RG, Ketchum J, Boehler ML, Dunnington GL (2005) Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents. Surgery 138(4):640–647PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ahmed K, Miskovic D, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Hanna GB (2011) Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review. Am J Surg 202(4):469–480PubMedCrossRef Ahmed K, Miskovic D, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Hanna GB (2011) Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review. Am J Surg 202(4):469–480PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection
Authors
Daisuke Ban
Atsushi Kudo
Hiromitsu Ito
Yusuke Mitsunori
Satoshi Matsumura
Arihiro Aihara
Takanori Ochiai
Shinji Tanaka
Minoru Tanabe
Osamu Itano
Hironori Kaneko
Go Wakabayashi
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0302-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Updates in Surgery 2/2015 Go to the issue