Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2013

01-03-2013 | Review Article

Robotic surgery in Italy national survey (2011)

Authors: Eugenio Santoro, Vito Pansadoro

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic surgery in Italy has become a clinical reality that is gaining increasing acceptance. As of 2011 after the United States, Italy together with Germany is the country with the largest number of active Robotic centers, 46, and da Vinci Robots installed, with at least 116 operators already trained. The number of interventions performed in Italy in 2011 exceeded 6,000 and in 2010 were 4,784, with prevalence for urology, general surgery and gynecology, however these interventions have also begun to be applied in other fields such as cervicofacial, cardiothoracic and pediatric surgery. In Italy Robotic centers are mostly located in Northern Italy, while in the South there are only a few centers, and four regions are lacking altogether. Of the 46 centers which were started in 1999, the vast majority is still operational and almost half handle over 200 cases a year. The quality of the work is also especially high with large diffusion of radical prostatectomy in urology and liver resection and colic in general surgery. The method is very well accepted among operators, over 80 %, and among patients, over 95 %. From the analysis of world literature and a survey carried out in Italy, Robotic surgery, which at the moment could be better defined as telesurgery, represents a significant advantage for operators and a consistent gain for the patient. However, it still has important limits such as high cost and non-structured training of operators.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morris B (2005) Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. Med Gen Med 7(3):72 Morris B (2005) Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. Med Gen Med 7(3):72
2.
go back to reference Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379–380PubMedCrossRef Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379–380PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21PubMedCrossRef Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Amodeo A (2009) Linares Quevedo A, Joseph JV, Belgrano E, Patel HR. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Minerva Urol Nefrol 61(2):121–128PubMed Amodeo A (2009) Linares Quevedo A, Joseph JV, Belgrano E, Patel HR. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Minerva Urol Nefrol 61(2):121–128PubMed
5.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325 discussion 311–312PubMedCrossRef Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325 discussion 311–312PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tang VCY, Stacey NC (2007) Robotic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(4):447–448 Tang VCY, Stacey NC (2007) Robotic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(4):447–448
8.
go back to reference Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Ng WS, Timoney AG, Wickham JE (1991) The development of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 205(1):35–38PubMed Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Ng WS, Timoney AG, Wickham JE (1991) The development of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 205(1):35–38PubMed
9.
go back to reference Murphy D, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2006) Robotic technology in urology. Postgrad Med J 82(973):743–747PubMedCrossRef Murphy D, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P (2006) Robotic technology in urology. Postgrad Med J 82(973):743–747PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Babbar P, Hemal AK (2011) Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010 - Advancements and future outlook. Urol Ann 3(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef Babbar P, Hemal AK (2011) Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010 - Advancements and future outlook. Urol Ann 3(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2010) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 57(3):453–458PubMedCrossRef Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2010) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 57(3):453–458PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R (2009) Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. BJU Int 104(11):1722–1729PubMedCrossRef Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R (2009) Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. BJU Int 104(11):1722–1729PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Seo IY, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, Lee JW, Rim JS (2011) Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol 52(4):279–283PubMedCrossRef Seo IY, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, Lee JW, Rim JS (2011) Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol 52(4):279–283PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Debernardo R, Starks D, Barker N, Armstrong A, Kunos CA (2011) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011:139867PubMed Debernardo R, Starks D, Barker N, Armstrong A, Kunos CA (2011) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011:139867PubMed
17.
go back to reference Nick AM, Ramirez PT (2011) The impact of robotic surgery on gynecologic oncology. J Gynecol Oncol 22(3):196–202PubMedCrossRef Nick AM, Ramirez PT (2011) The impact of robotic surgery on gynecologic oncology. J Gynecol Oncol 22(3):196–202PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47(12):2162–2168PubMedCrossRef D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47(12):2162–2168PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632PubMedCrossRef Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Baek SJ, Lee DW, Park SS, Kim SH (2011) Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 3(10):137–143PubMedCrossRef Baek SJ, Lee DW, Park SS, Kim SH (2011) Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 3(10):137–143PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, Gunasekaran G, Chalikonda S, Fung J (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, Gunasekaran G, Chalikonda S, Fung J (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Panaro F, Piardi T, Cag M, Cinqualbre J, Wolf P, Audet M (2011) Robotic liver resection as a bridge to liver transplantation. JSLS 15(1):86–89PubMedCrossRef Panaro F, Piardi T, Cag M, Cinqualbre J, Wolf P, Audet M (2011) Robotic liver resection as a bridge to liver transplantation. JSLS 15(1):86–89PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
26.
go back to reference Widmann G (2007) Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area. Biomed Imaging Interv J 3(1):e11PubMedCrossRef Widmann G (2007) Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area. Biomed Imaging Interv J 3(1):e11PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Awang MS, Abdullah MZ (2011) Robotic neurosurgery: a preliminary study using an active vision-guided robotic arm for bone drilling and endoscopic manoeuvres. Malays J Med Sci 18(2):53–57PubMed Awang MS, Abdullah MZ (2011) Robotic neurosurgery: a preliminary study using an active vision-guided robotic arm for bone drilling and endoscopic manoeuvres. Malays J Med Sci 18(2):53–57PubMed
28.
go back to reference Chitwood WR Jr (2011) Robotic cardiac surgery by 2031. Tex Heart Inst J 38(6):691–693PubMed Chitwood WR Jr (2011) Robotic cardiac surgery by 2031. Tex Heart Inst J 38(6):691–693PubMed
30.
go back to reference Nakamura N, Sugano N, Nishii T, Kakimoto A, Miki H (2010) A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(4):1072–1081PubMedCrossRef Nakamura N, Sugano N, Nishii T, Kakimoto A, Miki H (2010) A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(4):1072–1081PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic surgery in Italy national survey (2011)
Authors
Eugenio Santoro
Vito Pansadoro
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0190-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Updates in Surgery 1/2013 Go to the issue