Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Tumor Biology 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Research Article

In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis

Authors: Jieying Tan, Li Xu, Wenqing Yao, Yun Wan, Shuqin Zhou, Sherman Xuegang Xin

Published in: Tumor Biology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the in vivo post-contrast proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for benign/malignant discrimination of focal breast lesions. Sixteen studies with a total of 661 malignant breast lesions and 388 benign breast lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of post-contrast 1H-MRS were 74 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 70–77 %) and 78 % (95 % CI 73–82 %), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 4.00 (95 % CI 2.74–5.84) and 0.25 (95 % CI 0.17–0.37), respectively. From the fitted summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC), the AUC and Q* index were 0.89 and 0.83. Publication bias was present (t = 2.43, P = 0.029). Meta-regression analysis suggested that neither threshold effect nor evaluated covariates including method of choline analysis, strength of field, pulse sequence, repetition time (TR), and time interval were sources of heterogeneity (all P values >0.05). In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS was useful for differentiation between malignant and benign focal breast lesions. However, pooled diagnostic measures might be overestimated. The standardization of the acquisition protocol as well as the post-processing method for post-contrast proton MRS need to be established for the future study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bartella L, Huang W. Proton (1H) MR spectroscopy of the breast. Radiographics. 2007;27 Suppl 1:S241–52. Bartella L, Huang W. Proton (1H) MR spectroscopy of the breast. Radiographics. 2007;27 Suppl 1:S241–52.
2.
go back to reference Cen D, Xu L. Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions using single-voxel proton MRS: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140(6):993–1001. doi:10.1007/s00432-014-1605-7. Cen D, Xu L. Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions using single-voxel proton MRS: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140(6):993–1001. doi:10.​1007/​s00432-014-1605-7.
3.
go back to reference Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, Lutz JM, De Angelis R, Capocaccia R, Baili P, Rachet B, Gatta G, Hakulinen T, Micheli A, Sant M, Weir HK, Elwood JM, Tsukuma H, Koifman S, GA ES, Francisci S, Santaquilani M, Verdecchia A, Storm HH, Young JL, Group CW. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol. 2008;730–56. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70179-7. Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, Lutz JM, De Angelis R, Capocaccia R, Baili P, Rachet B, Gatta G, Hakulinen T, Micheli A, Sant M, Weir HK, Elwood JM, Tsukuma H, Koifman S, GA ES, Francisci S, Santaquilani M, Verdecchia A, Storm HH, Young JL, Group CW. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol. 2008;730–56. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(08)70179-7.
4.
go back to reference Lacey Jr JV, Kreimer AR, Buys SS, Marcus PM, Chang SC, Leitzmann MF, et al. Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Project T: breast cancer epidemiology according to recognized breast cancer risk factors in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial Cohort. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lacey Jr JV, Kreimer AR, Buys SS, Marcus PM, Chang SC, Leitzmann MF, et al. Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Project T: breast cancer epidemiology according to recognized breast cancer risk factors in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial Cohort. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Gruber S, Debski BK, Pinker K, Chmelik M, Grabner G, Helbich T, et al. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging at 3 T for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Radiology. 2011;261:752–61.CrossRefPubMed Gruber S, Debski BK, Pinker K, Chmelik M, Grabner G, Helbich T, et al. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging at 3 T for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Radiology. 2011;261:752–61.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Vassiou K, Tsougos I, Kousi E, Vlychou M, Athanasiou E, Theodorou K, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV. Application value of 3T 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diagnosing breast tumors. Acta Radiol. 2013;54(4):380–388. Vassiou K, Tsougos I, Kousi E, Vlychou M, Athanasiou E, Theodorou K, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV. Application value of 3T 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diagnosing breast tumors. Acta Radiol. 2013;54(4):380–388.
7.
go back to reference Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bottomley PA, Bhujwalla Z, Bluemke DA. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of human breast cancer: a preliminary study. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2004;19:68–75.CrossRefPubMed Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bottomley PA, Bhujwalla Z, Bluemke DA. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of human breast cancer: a preliminary study. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2004;19:68–75.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lu H, Liu PF, Bao RX, Sun F. Evaluation of spectral selected press sequence in breast lesion characterization. Chin Med Sci J. 2006;21:265–9.PubMed Lu H, Liu PF, Bao RX, Sun F. Evaluation of spectral selected press sequence in breast lesion characterization. Chin Med Sci J. 2006;21:265–9.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Su MY, Baik HM, Yu HJ, Chen JH, Mehta RS, Nalcioglu O. Comparison of choline and pharmacokinetic parameters in breast cancer measured by MR spectroscopic imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006;5:401–10.PubMed Su MY, Baik HM, Yu HJ, Chen JH, Mehta RS, Nalcioglu O. Comparison of choline and pharmacokinetic parameters in breast cancer measured by MR spectroscopic imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006;5:401–10.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Baek HM. Diagnostic value of breast proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 1.5T in different histopathological types. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:508295. Baek HM. Diagnostic value of breast proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 1.5T in different histopathological types. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:508295.
11.
go back to reference Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Liberman L, Thakur SB, Moskowitz C, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast cancer diagnosis: preliminary study. Radiology. 2006;239:686–92.CrossRefPubMed Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Liberman L, Thakur SB, Moskowitz C, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast cancer diagnosis: preliminary study. Radiology. 2006;239:686–92.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Basara I, Orguc S, Coskun T. Single voxel in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast lesions: experience in 77 cases. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19:221–6.PubMed Basara I, Orguc S, Coskun T. Single voxel in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast lesions: experience in 77 cases. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19:221–6.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K, Tudorica LA, O’Hea B, Button TM. Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology. 2004;232:585–91.CrossRefPubMed Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K, Tudorica LA, O’Hea B, Button TM. Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology. 2004;232:585–91.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mizukoshi W, Kozawa E, Inoue K, Saito N, Nishi N, Saeki T, et al. (1)H MR spectroscopy with external reference solution at 1.5 T for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions: comparison using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:75–83.CrossRefPubMed Mizukoshi W, Kozawa E, Inoue K, Saito N, Nishi N, Saeki T, et al. (1)H MR spectroscopy with external reference solution at 1.5 T for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions: comparison using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:75–83.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Suppiah S, Rahmat K, Mohd-Shah MN, Azlan CA, Tan LK, Aziz YF, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign lesions using single-voxel proton MRS of the breast at 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:e502–10.CrossRefPubMed Suppiah S, Rahmat K, Mohd-Shah MN, Azlan CA, Tan LK, Aziz YF, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign lesions using single-voxel proton MRS of the breast at 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:e502–10.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tozaki M, Fukuma E. 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:840–9.CrossRefPubMed Tozaki M, Fukuma E. 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:840–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tse GM, Cheung HS, Pang LM, Chu WC, Law BK, Kung FY, et al. Characterization of lesions of the breast with proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of carcinomas, benign lesions, and phyllodes tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1267–72.CrossRefPubMed Tse GM, Cheung HS, Pang LM, Chu WC, Law BK, Kung FY, et al. Characterization of lesions of the breast with proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of carcinomas, benign lesions, and phyllodes tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1267–72.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kousi E, Tsougos I, Vasiou K, Theodorou K, Poultsidi A, Fezoulidis I, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the breast at 3 T: pre- and post-contrast evaluation for breast lesion characterization. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:754380.PubMedPubMedCentral Kousi E, Tsougos I, Vasiou K, Theodorou K, Poultsidi A, Fezoulidis I, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the breast at 3 T: pre- and post-contrast evaluation for breast lesion characterization. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:754380.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Roebuck JR, Cecil KM, Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE. Human breast lesions: characterization with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 1998;209:269–75.CrossRefPubMed Roebuck JR, Cecil KM, Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE. Human breast lesions: characterization with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 1998;209:269–75.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Di Leo G, de Nijs R, Vorbuchner M, Podo F. In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of the breast using the total choline peak integral as a marker of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1608–17.CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Di Leo G, de Nijs R, Vorbuchner M, Podo F. In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of the breast using the total choline peak integral as a marker of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1608–17.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Yeung DK, Cheung HS, Tse GM. Human breast lesions: characterization with contrast-enhanced in vivo proton MR spectroscopy—initial results. Radiology. 2001;220:40–6.CrossRefPubMed Yeung DK, Cheung HS, Tse GM. Human breast lesions: characterization with contrast-enhanced in vivo proton MR spectroscopy—initial results. Radiology. 2001;220:40–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Smith JK, Kwock L, Castillo M. Effects of contrast material on single-volume proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1084–9.PubMed Smith JK, Kwock L, Castillo M. Effects of contrast material on single-volume proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1084–9.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Xu L, Huang Y, Liu X, Liu B. Effects of contrast agent and outer volume saturation bands on water suppression and shimming of hepatic single-volume proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0T. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:804–698. Xu L, Huang Y, Liu X, Liu B. Effects of contrast agent and outer volume saturation bands on water suppression and shimming of hepatic single-volume proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0T. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:804–698.
24.
go back to reference Lenkinski RE, Wang X, Elian M, Goldberg SN. Interaction of gadolinium-based MR contrast agents with choline: implications for MR spectroscopy (MRS) of the breast. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:1286–92.CrossRefPubMed Lenkinski RE, Wang X, Elian M, Goldberg SN. Interaction of gadolinium-based MR contrast agents with choline: implications for MR spectroscopy (MRS) of the breast. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:1286–92.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Battal B, Bozkurt Y, Hamcan S, Akgun V. Re: Improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign lesions using single-voxel proton MRS of the breast at 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:e108–9.CrossRefPubMed Battal B, Bozkurt Y, Hamcan S, Akgun V. Re: Improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign lesions using single-voxel proton MRS of the breast at 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:e108–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Battal B, Akgun V, Karaman B. Value of 3 T 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors. Acta Radiol. 2014;55:416–7.CrossRefPubMed Battal B, Akgun V, Karaman B. Value of 3 T 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors. Acta Radiol. 2014;55:416–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ho KM. Forest and funnel plots illustrated the calibration of a prognostic model: a descriptive study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:746–51.CrossRefPubMed Ho KM. Forest and funnel plots illustrated the calibration of a prognostic model: a descriptive study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:746–51.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Souza JP, Pileggi C, Cecatti JG. Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: an analytic survey. Reprod Health. 2007;4:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Souza JP, Pileggi C, Cecatti JG. Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: an analytic survey. Reprod Health. 2007;4:3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
30.
go back to reference Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Bydder M, Yokoo T, Schwimmer JB, Kono Y, et al. Effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:145–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Bydder M, Yokoo T, Schwimmer JB, Kono Y, et al. Effect of PRESS and STEAM sequences on magnetic resonance spectroscopic liver fat quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:145–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Yeh J, D’Amico F. Forest plots: data summaries at a glance. J Fam Pract. 2004;53:1007.PubMed Yeh J, D’Amico F. Forest plots: data summaries at a glance. J Fam Pract. 2004;53:1007.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Baltzer PA, Dietzel M. Breast lesions: diagnosis by using proton MR spectroscopy at 1.5 and 3.0 T—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2013;267:735–46.CrossRefPubMed Baltzer PA, Dietzel M. Breast lesions: diagnosis by using proton MR spectroscopy at 1.5 and 3.0 T—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2013;267:735–46.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Xu L, Liang CH, Huang B, Tan SH, Cen D, Cui YH, et al. Effects of contrast agent on water suppression and shimming of kidney single-volume proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0T. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1462–7.CrossRefPubMed Xu L, Liang CH, Huang B, Tan SH, Cen D, Cui YH, et al. Effects of contrast agent on water suppression and shimming of kidney single-volume proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0T. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1462–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis
Authors
Jieying Tan
Li Xu
Wenqing Yao
Yun Wan
Shuqin Zhou
Sherman Xuegang Xin
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Tumor Biology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Electronic ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2635-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Tumor Biology 1/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine