Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions using single-voxel proton MRS: a meta-analysis

  • Original Article - Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We aim to investigate the diagnostic capability of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy (MRS) for benign/malignant discrimination of focal breast lesions with a meta-analysis.

Materials and methods

The meta-analysis included a total of 750 malignant breast lesions and 419 benign breast lesions from eighteen studies.

Results

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRS were 0.71 (95 % CI 0.68–0.74) and 0.85 (95 % CI 0.81–0.88), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and negative LR were 4.11 (95 % CI 3.11–5.43) and 0.25 (95 % CI 0.17–0.36), respectively. The P value for χ 2 heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was <0.05. From the fitted summary receiver operating characteristics curve, AUC was 0.89 and Q* was 0.84. Asymmetrical in funnel plots indicated there may be publication bias (t = 2.85, P = 0.012). The meta-regression analysis indicated that neither threshold effect nor evaluated covariates that include strength of field, scanning technique (PRESS or STEAM), repetition time, NSA, and pre- or post-contrast agent were the sources of heterogeneity (all P value >0.05).

Conclusions

Single-voxel proton MRS was useful for differentiation between malignant and benign breast lesions. However, pooled diagnostic measures might be overestimated. The standardization of the acquisition protocol for MRS across the multicenter trials is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson BO, Yip CH, Smith RA, Shyyan R, Sener SF, Eniu A, Carlson RW, Azavedo E, Harford J (2008) Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries: overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative Global Summit 2007. Cancer 113:2221–2243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baek HM (2012) Diagnostic value of breast proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 1.5 T in different histopathological types. Sci World J 2012:508295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek HM, Chen JH, Yu HJ, Mehta R, Nalcioglu O, Su MY (2008) Detection of choline signal in human breast lesions with chemical-shift imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:1114–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Kaiser WA (2012) MR-spectroscopy at 1.5 tesla and 3 tesla. Useful? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 81(Suppl 1):S6–S9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartella L, Huang W (2007) Proton (1H) MR spectroscopy of the breast. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 27 Suppl 1:S241–S252

  • Bartella L, Morris EA (2006) Advances in breast imaging: magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Oncol Rep 8:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Liberman L, Thakur SB, Moskowitz C, Guido J, Huang W (2006) Proton MR spectroscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast cancer diagnosis: preliminary study. Radiology 239:686–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartella L, Smith CS, Dershaw DD, Liberman L (2007) Imaging breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 45:45–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basara I, Orguc S, Coskun T (2013) Single voxel in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast lesions: experience in 77 cases. Diagn Interv Radiol 19:221–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolan PJ, Nelson MT, Yee D, Garwood M (2005) Imaging in breast cancer: magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Breast Cancer Res 7:149–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cecil KM, Schnall MD, Siegelman ES, Lenkinski RE (2001) The evaluation of human breast lesions with magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 68:45–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, Lutz JM, De Angelis R, Capocaccia R, Baili P, Rachet B, Gatta G, Hakulinen T, Micheli A, Sant M, Weir HK, Elwood JM, Tsukuma H, Koifman S, GA ES, Francisci S, Santaquilani M, Verdecchia A, Storm HH, Young JL, Group CW (2008) Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol 9:730–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuzick J (2005) Forest plots and the interpretation of subgroups. Lancet 365:1308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danaei G, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Comparative Risk Assessment collaborating group (2005) Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet 366:1784–1793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El Khouli RH, Macura KJ, Jacobs MA, Khalil TH, Kamel IR, Dwyer A, Bluemke DA (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W295–W300

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho KM (2007) Forest and funnel plots illustrated the calibration of a prognostic model: a descriptive study. J Clin Epidemiol 60:746–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K, Tudorica LA, O’Hea B, Button TM (2004) Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology 232:585–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan NR, Kumar M, Seenu V, Coshic O, Dwivedi SN, Julka PK, Srivastava A, Rath GK (2001) Evaluation of total choline from in vivo volume localized proton MR spectroscopy and its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 84:1016–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JK, Park SH, Lee HM, Lee YH, Sung NK, Chung DS, Kim OD (2003) In vivo 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast diseases. Breast 12:179–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kousi E, Tsougos I, Vasiou K, Theodorou K, Poultsidi A, Fezoulidis I, Kappas C (2012) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the breast at 3T: pre- and post-contrast evaluation for breast lesion characterization. Sci World J 2012:754380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kvistad KA, Bakken IJ, Gribbestad IS, Ehrnholm B, Lundgren S, Fjosne HE, Haraldseth O (1999) Characterization of neoplastic and normal human breast tissues with in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:159–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwee SA, DeGrado TR, Talbot JN, Gutman F, Coel MN (2007) Cancer imaging with fluorine-18-labeled choline derivatives. Semin Nucl Med 37:420–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey JV, Kreimer AR, Buys SS, Marcus PM, Chang SC, Leitzmann MF, Hoover RN, Prorok PC, Berg CD, Hartge P, Prostate LC, Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Project T (2009) Breast cancer epidemiology according to recognized breast cancer risk factors in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial cohort. BMC Cancer 9:84

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Chen Z, Wang J (2012) Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign hepatic tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient on 1.5-T MR imaging: a meta analysis. Eur J Radiol 81:484–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Liu PF, Bao RX, Sun F (2006) Evaluation of spectral selected press sequence in breast lesion characterization. Chin Med Sci J = Chung-kuo i hsueh k’o hsueh tsa chih/Chin Acad Med Sci 21:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizukoshi W, Kozawa E, Inoue K, Saito N, Nishi N, Saeki T, Kimura F (2013) (1)H MR spectroscopy with external reference solution at 1.5 T for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions: comparison using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Eur Radiol 23:75–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mountford C, Ramadan S, Stanwell P, Malycha P (2009) Proton MRS of the breast in the clinical setting. NMR Biomed 22:54–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MT, Everson LI, Garwood M, Emory T, Bolan PJ (2008) MR spectroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Semin Breast Dis 11:100–105

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roebuck JR, Cecil KM, Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE (1998) Human breast lesions: characterization with proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 209:269–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Di Leo G, de Nijs R, Vorbuchner M, Podo F (2009) In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of the breast using the total choline peak integral as a marker of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1608–1617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah N, Sattar A, Benanti M, Hollander S, Cheuck L (2006) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy as an imaging tool for cancer: a review of the literature. J Am Osteopath Assoc 106:23–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Souza JP, Pileggi C, Cecatti JG (2007) Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: an analytic survey. Reprod Health 4:3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suppiah S, Rahmat K, Mohd-Shah MN, Azlan CA, Tan LK, Aziz YF, Vijayananthan A, Wui AL, Yip CH (2013) Improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign lesions using single-voxel proton MRS of the breast at 3 T MRI. Clin Radiol 68:e502–e510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tozaki M, Fukuma E (2009) 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:840–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tse GM, Cheung HS, Pang LM, Chu WC, Law BK, Kung FY, Yeung DK (2003) Characterization of lesions of the breast with proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of carcinomas, benign lesions, and phyllodes tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1267–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vassiou K, Tsougos I, Kousi E, Vlychou M, Athanasiou E, Theodorou K, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV (2013) Application value of 3T 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diagnosing breast tumors. Acta Radiol 54:380–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh J, D’Amico F (1007) Forest plots: data summaries at a glance. J Fam Pract 2004:53

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung DK, Cheung HS, Tse GM (2001) Human breast lesions: characterization with contrast-enhanced in vivo proton MR spectroscopy—initial results. Radiology 220:40–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partly supported by The Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Dr. Startup Project, No. S2012040006618; Postdoctoral Fund of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 20120621.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work; there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled: “Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions using single-voxel proton MRS: A meta-analysis.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Xu.

Additional information

Dongzhi Cen and Li Xu have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cen, D., Xu, L. Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions using single-voxel proton MRS: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 140, 993–1001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-014-1605-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-014-1605-7

Keywords

Navigation