Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2012

Open Access 01-02-2012 | Statement

Mammography: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information

Authors: Francesco Sardanelli, Thomas H. Helbich, for the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

This paper summarises the basic information to be offered to women who undergo mammography. After a delineation of the general aim of early diagnosis of breast cancer, the main difference between screening mammography and diagnostic mammography is explained. The best time for scheduling mammography in fertile women is defined. The need to bring images and reports from the previous mammogram (and from other recent breast imaging examinations) is highlighted. The technique and procedure of mammography are briefly described with particular attention to discomfort and pain experienced by a fraction of women who undergo the test. Information is given on the recall during a screening program and on the request for further work-up after a diagnostic mammography. The logic of the diagnostic mammography report and of classification systems such as BI-RADS and R1-R5 is illustrated, and brief but clear information is given about the diagnostic performance of the test, with particular reference to interval cancers. Moreover, the breast cancer risk due to radiation exposure from mammography is compared to the reduction in mortality obtained with the test, and the concept of overdiagnosis is presented. Finally, five frequently asked questions are answered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference de Koning HJ (2003) Mammographic screening: evidence from randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol 14:1185–1189PubMedCrossRef de Koning HJ (2003) Mammographic screening: evidence from randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol 14:1185–1189PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Feig SA (2005) Screening mammography controversies: resolved, partly resolved, and unresolved. Breast J 11:S3–S6PubMedCrossRef Feig SA (2005) Screening mammography controversies: resolved, partly resolved, and unresolved. Breast J 11:S3–S6PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316PubMedCrossRef Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Drossaert CH, Boer H, Seydel ER (2002) Monitoring women's experiences during three rounds of breast cancer screening: results from a longitudinal study. J Med Screen 9:168–175PubMedCrossRef Drossaert CH, Boer H, Seydel ER (2002) Monitoring women's experiences during three rounds of breast cancer screening: results from a longitudinal study. J Med Screen 9:168–175PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Törnberg S, Kemetli L, Ascunce N et al (2010) A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries. Eur J Cancer Prev 19:87–93PubMedCrossRef Törnberg S, Kemetli L, Ascunce N et al (2010) A pooled analysis of interval cancer rates in six European countries. Eur J Cancer Prev 19:87–93PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M et al (2011) Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 47:1021–1026PubMedCrossRef Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M et al (2011) Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 47:1021–1026PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG (2011) Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology 258:98–105PubMedCrossRef Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG (2011) Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology 258:98–105PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Allgood PC, Warwick J, Warren RM et al (2008) A case-control study of the impact of the East Anglian breast screening programme on breast cancer mortality. Br J Cancer 98:206–209PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Allgood PC, Warwick J, Warren RM et al (2008) A case-control study of the impact of the East Anglian breast screening programme on breast cancer mortality. Br J Cancer 98:206–209PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Puliti D, Miccinesi G, Collina N, IMPACT Working Group, et al (2008) Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction. Br J Cancer 99:423–427PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Puliti D, Miccinesi G, Collina N, IMPACT Working Group, et al (2008) Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction. Br J Cancer 99:423–427PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Biesheuvel C, Barratt A, Howard K, Houssami N, Irwig L (2007) Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 8:1129–1138PubMedCrossRef Biesheuvel C, Barratt A, Howard K, Houssami N, Irwig L (2007) Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 8:1129–1138PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Peek ME (2003) Screening mammography in the elderly: a review of the issues. J Am Med Womens Assoc 58:191–198PubMed Peek ME (2003) Screening mammography in the elderly: a review of the issues. J Am Med Womens Assoc 58:191–198PubMed
Metadata
Title
Mammography: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information
Authors
Francesco Sardanelli
Thomas H. Helbich
for the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0127-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Insights into Imaging 1/2012 Go to the issue