Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 6/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Pictorial Review

Imaging of breast implants—a pictorial review

Authors: Sergi Juanpere, Elsa Perez, Oscar Huc, Naiara Motos, Josep Pont, Salvador Pedraza

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The number of women with breast implants is increasing. Radiologists must be familiar with the normal and abnormal findings of common implants. Implant rupture is a well-known complication after surgery and is the main cause of implant removal. Although mammography and ultrasonography are the standard first steps in the diagnostic workup, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most useful imaging modality for the characterisation of breast implants because of its high spatial resolution and contrast between implants and soft tissues and absence of ionising radiation. MRI has the highest sensitivity and specificity for implant rupture, thanks to its sequences that can suppress or emphasise the signal from silicone. Regardless of the technique used, the overall aim of imaging breast implants is to provide essential information about tissue and prosthesis integrity, detect implant abnormalities and detect breast diseases unrelated to implants, such as breast cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frank S, Mahdi R, Sherko K (2010) Imaging in patients with breast implants—results of the First International Breast (Implant) Conference 2009. Insights Imaging 1:93–97CrossRef Frank S, Mahdi R, Sherko K (2010) Imaging in patients with breast implants—results of the First International Breast (Implant) Conference 2009. Insights Imaging 1:93–97CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yasuo A, Ritsu A, Shinichiro K et al (2007) Silicone-selective multishot echo-planar imaging for rapid MRI survey of breast implants. Eur Radiol 17:1875–1878CrossRef Yasuo A, Ritsu A, Shinichiro K et al (2007) Silicone-selective multishot echo-planar imaging for rapid MRI survey of breast implants. Eur Radiol 17:1875–1878CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hölmich Lisbet R, Fryzek Jon P, Kim K et al (2005) The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 54:583–589PubMedCrossRef Hölmich Lisbet R, Fryzek Jon P, Kim K et al (2005) The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 54:583–589PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hölmich Lisbet R, Soren F, Fryzek Jon P et al (2003) Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture. Arch Surg 138:801–806PubMedCrossRef Hölmich Lisbet R, Soren F, Fryzek Jon P et al (2003) Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture. Arch Surg 138:801–806PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hölmich Lisbet R, Vejborg Ilse M, Carsten C et al (2005) The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation. Eur J Radiol 53:213–225PubMedCrossRef Hölmich Lisbet R, Vejborg Ilse M, Carsten C et al (2005) The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation. Eur J Radiol 53:213–225PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hölmich Lisbet R, Vejborg Ilse M, Carsten C et al (2004) Untreated silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:204–214PubMedCrossRef Hölmich Lisbet R, Vejborg Ilse M, Carsten C et al (2004) Untreated silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:204–214PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Herborn Cristoph U, Borut M, Daniel E et al (2002) Breast augmentation and reconstructive surgery: MR imaging of implant rupture and malignancy. Eur Radiol 12:2198–2206CrossRef Herborn Cristoph U, Borut M, Daniel E et al (2002) Breast augmentation and reconstructive surgery: MR imaging of implant rupture and malignancy. Eur Radiol 12:2198–2206CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chul TK, Sun JH, Suk RT et al (2005) Analysis of 30 breast implant rupture cases. Aesth Plast Surg 29:460–469CrossRef Chul TK, Sun JH, Suk RT et al (2005) Analysis of 30 breast implant rupture cases. Aesth Plast Surg 29:460–469CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gorczyca David P, Gorczyca Stephanie M, Gorczyca Kathryn (2007) The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(suppl1):49S–61SPubMedCrossRef Gorczyca David P, Gorczyca Stephanie M, Gorczyca Kathryn (2007) The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(suppl1):49S–61SPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Glynn C, Litherland J (2008) Imaging breast augmentation and reconstruction. Br J Radiol 81:587–595PubMedCrossRef Glynn C, Litherland J (2008) Imaging breast augmentation and reconstruction. Br J Radiol 81:587–595PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sardanelli F et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. May;46(8):1296–316 Sardanelli F et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. May;46(8):1296–316
12.
go back to reference Yang N, Muradali D (2011) The augmented breast: a pictorial review of the abnormal and unusual. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr;196(4):W451–460 Yang N, Muradali D (2011) The augmented breast: a pictorial review of the abnormal and unusual. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr;196(4):W451–460
13.
go back to reference Colombo G et al. (2011) Prosthetic Breast Implant Rupture: Imaging-Pictorial Essay. Aesth Plast Surg. Apr 13 [Epub ahead of print] Colombo G et al. (2011) Prosthetic Breast Implant Rupture: Imaging-Pictorial Essay. Aesth Plast Surg. Apr 13 [Epub ahead of print]
15.
go back to reference Berg Wendie A, Khanh NT, Middleton MS et al (2002) MR imaging of extracapsular silicone from breast implants: diagnostic pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgen 178:465–472CrossRef Berg Wendie A, Khanh NT, Middleton MS et al (2002) MR imaging of extracapsular silicone from breast implants: diagnostic pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgen 178:465–472CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Giovanni Di Benedetto, Sara C, Luca G et al (2008) Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings. Breast J 14:532–537CrossRef Giovanni Di Benedetto, Sara C, Luca G et al (2008) Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings. Breast J 14:532–537CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Anna C, Carolina M, Chiara I et al (2006) Ultrasonographic appearance of breast implant complications. Ann Plast Surg 56:243–247CrossRef Anna C, Carolina M, Chiara I et al (2006) Ultrasonographic appearance of breast implant complications. Ann Plast Surg 56:243–247CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Handel Neal (2007) The effect of silicone implants on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(suppl1):81S–93SPubMedCrossRef Handel Neal (2007) The effect of silicone implants on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(suppl1):81S–93SPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Imaging of breast implants—a pictorial review
Authors
Sergi Juanpere
Elsa Perez
Oscar Huc
Naiara Motos
Josep Pont
Salvador Pedraza
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 6/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0122-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Insights into Imaging 6/2011 Go to the issue