Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Quality Indicators for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Applicability and Clinical Relevance in a Non-screened Population

Authors: Sanjit Kumar Agrawal, Sachin Suresh Shenoy, Nikhil Nalawade, Soumtira Shankar Datta, Soumendranath Roy, Sanjoy Chatterjee, Indu Arun, Rosina Ahmed

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Quality Indicators for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Applicability and Clinical Relevance in a Non-screened Population: sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as standard of care for management of early breast cancer. This study assessed our SLNB program against 11 published quality indicators (QIs). All breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB in our centre from June 2013–Dec 2015 were included. Clinical, pathological and follow-up data were extracted from the institutional REDCap data system. Analysis was done with SPSS 23. Following validation, 234 patients had SLNB, always performed along with primary surgery. Identification rate was 95.3% and > 1 SLN was identified in 72% of patients. SLNB positivity was 33%, of these, 100% underwent ALND. Overall 91% of QI eligible patients underwent SLNB. No ineligible patients (T4) underwent SLNB. For the patients who had radio colloid, injection criteria were met for 100%. Pathological evaluation and reporting criteria were met for 100% of patients. There were no axillary recurrences in a median follow-up of 2 years. 7.6% patients had SLN negative on frozen section but positive on final histology. 7.2% of patients with clinical negative nodes had pN2 disease in final histopathology report after surgery. Sixty percent of patients who had completion ALND had only positive SLN. This study supports the applicability of published QI of SLNB in a non-screened cohort of early breast cancer patients. Although QI were useful, modification based on patient characteristics and resource availability may be needed. These indicators can be used as audit tools to improve the overall accuracy of the procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH (2006) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis. Cancer 106(1):4–16CrossRefPubMed Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH (2006) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma: a metaanalysis. Cancer 106(1):4–16CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al (2007) Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 8(10):881–888CrossRefPubMed Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al (2007) Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 8(10):881–888CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23(30):7703–7720CrossRef Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23(30):7703–7720CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Giammarile F, Alazraki N, Aarsvold JN et al (2013) The EANM and SNMMI practice guideline for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40(12):1932–1947CrossRefPubMed Giammarile F, Alazraki N, Aarsvold JN et al (2013) The EANM and SNMMI practice guideline for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40(12):1932–1947CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rutgers EJ (2005) Guidelines to assure quality in breast cancer surgery. Europ J Surg Oncol 31(6):568–576CrossRef Rutgers EJ (2005) Guidelines to assure quality in breast cancer surgery. Europ J Surg Oncol 31(6):568–576CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schachter HM, Mamaladze V, Lewin G et al (2006) Many quality measurements, but few quality measures assessing the quality of breast cancer care in women: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 6:291CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schachter HM, Mamaladze V, Lewin G et al (2006) Many quality measurements, but few quality measures assessing the quality of breast cancer care in women: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 6:291CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A, Mansel RE (2006) Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer—results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99(2):203–208CrossRefPubMed Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A, Mansel RE (2006) Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer—results of the ALMANAC validation phase. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99(2):203–208CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mansel RE, MacNeill F, Horgan K et al (2013) Results of a national training programme in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Br J Surg 100(5):654–661CrossRefPubMed Mansel RE, MacNeill F, Horgan K et al (2013) Results of a national training programme in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Br J Surg 100(5):654–661CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McMasters KM, Wong SL, Chao C et al (2001) Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniques. Ann Surg 234(3):292–299 discussion 9-300 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McMasters KM, Wong SL, Chao C et al (2001) Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniques. Ann Surg 234(3):292–299 discussion 9-300 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Simmons RM (2001) Review of sentinel lymph node credentialing: how many cases are enough? J Am Coll Surg 193(2):206–209CrossRefPubMed Simmons RM (2001) Review of sentinel lymph node credentialing: how many cases are enough? J Am Coll Surg 193(2):206–209CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lucci A Jr, Kelemen PR, Miller C III, Chardkoff L, Wilson L (2001) National practice patterns of sentinel lymph node dissection for breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 192(4):453–458CrossRefPubMed Lucci A Jr, Kelemen PR, Miller C III, Chardkoff L, Wilson L (2001) National practice patterns of sentinel lymph node dissection for breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 192(4):453–458CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Quan ML, Wells BJ, McCready D, Wright FC, Fraser N, Gagliardi AR (2010) Beyond the false negative rate: development of quality indicators for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(2):579–591CrossRefPubMed Quan ML, Wells BJ, McCready D, Wright FC, Fraser N, Gagliardi AR (2010) Beyond the false negative rate: development of quality indicators for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(2):579–591CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wells B, Saskin R, Wright F, McCready D, Quan ML (2013) Measuring the quality of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer: a population-based evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol 20(2):615–619CrossRefPubMed Wells B, Saskin R, Wright F, McCready D, Quan ML (2013) Measuring the quality of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer: a population-based evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol 20(2):615–619CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Acuna SA, Angarita FA, McCready DR, Escallon J (2013) Quality indicators for sentinel lymph node biopsy: is there room for improvement? Can J Surg 56(2):82–88CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Acuna SA, Angarita FA, McCready DR, Escallon J (2013) Quality indicators for sentinel lymph node biopsy: is there room for improvement? Can J Surg 56(2):82–88CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lester SC, Bose S, Chen YY et al (2009) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133(10):1515–1538PubMed Lester SC, Bose S, Chen YY et al (2009) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133(10):1515–1538PubMed
17.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRefPubMed Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wishart GC, Greenberg DC, Britton PD et al (2008) Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone? Br J Cancer 98(11):1741–1744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wishart GC, Greenberg DC, Britton PD et al (2008) Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone? Br J Cancer 98(11):1741–1744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Mook S, Van’t Veer LJ, Rutgers EJ et al (2011) Independent prognostic value of screen detection in invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(7):585–597CrossRefPubMed Mook S, Van’t Veer LJ, Rutgers EJ et al (2011) Independent prognostic value of screen detection in invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(7):585–597CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wishart GC, Bajdik CD, Dicks E et al (2012) PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2. Br J Cancer 107(5):800–807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wishart GC, Bajdik CD, Dicks E et al (2012) PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2. Br J Cancer 107(5):800–807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference East JM, Valentine CSP, Kanchev E, Blake GO (2009) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using methylene blue dye manifests a short learning curve among experienced surgeons: a prospective eoular cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. BMC Surg 9:2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral East JM, Valentine CSP, Kanchev E, Blake GO (2009) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer using methylene blue dye manifests a short learning curve among experienced surgeons: a prospective eoular cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. BMC Surg 9:2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Golshan M, Nakhlis F (2006) Can methylene blue only be used in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer? Breast J 12(5):428–430CrossRefPubMed Golshan M, Nakhlis F (2006) Can methylene blue only be used in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer? Breast J 12(5):428–430CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Nour A (2004) Efficacy of methylene blue dye in localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients. Breast J 10(5):388–391CrossRefPubMed Nour A (2004) Efficacy of methylene blue dye in localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients. Breast J 10(5):388–391CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Varghese P, Mostafa A, Abdel-Rahman AT et al (2007) Methylene blue dye versus combined dye-radioactive tracer technique for sentinel lymph node localisation in early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(2):147–152CrossRefPubMed Varghese P, Mostafa A, Abdel-Rahman AT et al (2007) Methylene blue dye versus combined dye-radioactive tracer technique for sentinel lymph node localisation in early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(2):147–152CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kamath R, Mahajan KS, Ashok L, Sanal TS (2013) A study on risk factors of breast cancer among patients attending the tertiary care hospital, in Udupi District. Indian J Community Med 38(2):95–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kamath R, Mahajan KS, Ashok L, Sanal TS (2013) A study on risk factors of breast cancer among patients attending the tertiary care hospital, in Udupi District. Indian J Community Med 38(2):95–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Renaudeau C, Lefebvre-Lacoeuille C, Campion L et al (2016) Evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous breast surgery for breast cancer: GATA study. Breast 28:54–59CrossRefPubMed Renaudeau C, Lefebvre-Lacoeuille C, Campion L et al (2016) Evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous breast surgery for breast cancer: GATA study. Breast 28:54–59CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Helyer LK, Coburn NG, Law CH, McCready DR (2008) Does the adoption of sentinel node biopsy account for the increase in node positivity in women with T1 tumors? Ann Surg Oncol 15(S2):75 Helyer LK, Coburn NG, Law CH, McCready DR (2008) Does the adoption of sentinel node biopsy account for the increase in node positivity in women with T1 tumors? Ann Surg Oncol 15(S2):75
29.
go back to reference Helyer LK, Coburn NG, Law CH, McCready DR (2007) Axillary staging is more accurate today than ever before: no increase in the false negative rate with wide-spread adoption of sentinel node technique. Breast Can Surg Treat 106(S1):s127–s128 Helyer LK, Coburn NG, Law CH, McCready DR (2007) Axillary staging is more accurate today than ever before: no increase in the false negative rate with wide-spread adoption of sentinel node technique. Breast Can Surg Treat 106(S1):s127–s128
30.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al (2006) Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 7(12):983–990CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al (2006) Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 7(12):983–990CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al (2003) A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 349(6):546–553CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al (2003) A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 349(6):546–553CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: impact of the number of sentinel nodes removed on the false-negative rate. J Am Coll Surg 192(6):684–689 discussion 9-91 CrossRefPubMed Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C et al (2001) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: impact of the number of sentinel nodes removed on the false-negative rate. J Am Coll Surg 192(6):684–689 discussion 9-91 CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S et al (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14(4):297–230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S et al (2013) Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14(4):297–230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV et al (2011) Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305(6):569–575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Pohlodek K, Bozikova S, Meciarova I, Mucha V, Bartova M, Ondrias F (2016) Prediction of additional lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes. Neoplasma 63(3):427–434CrossRefPubMed Pohlodek K, Bozikova S, Meciarova I, Mucha V, Bartova M, Ondrias F (2016) Prediction of additional lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes. Neoplasma 63(3):427–434CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Gary HL, Mark RS, Linda DB et al (2017) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 35:561–564 Gary HL, Mark RS, Linda DB et al (2017) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 35:561–564
Metadata
Title
Quality Indicators for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Applicability and Clinical Relevance in a Non-screened Population
Authors
Sanjit Kumar Agrawal
Sachin Suresh Shenoy
Nikhil Nalawade
Soumtira Shankar Datta
Soumendranath Roy
Sanjoy Chatterjee
Indu Arun
Rosina Ahmed
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Electronic ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0695-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 3/2018 Go to the issue