Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6/2020

01-12-2020 | Glioma | Original Article

Choroid Plexus as the Best Reference Region for Standardized Uptake Value Analysis on C11-Acetate PET/CT for Grading and Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Cerebral Gliomas

Authors: Dongwoo Kim, Arthur Cho, Sang Hyun Hwang, KwanHyeong Jo, Jong Hee Chang, Mijin Yun

Published in: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to compare different reference regions and select one with the most clinical relevance on C11-acetate (ACE) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with cerebral glioma.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients with cerebral glioma who underwent baseline ACE PET/CT at diagnosis. Other than the standardized uptake value (SUV) of the primary tumor, SUVs of the reference regions including the normal gray matter, white matter, choroid plexus, and cerebellum were measured. Then, the SUV ratio (SUVR = tumor SUVmax/reference region SUVmean) was calculated. The effect of patient age on the SUVmean of each reference was examined and the SUVRs of each reference region were compared between grades. age, sex, tumor size, histological grades, SUVR, and the presence of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation were included for survival analyses.

Results

Except for the cerebellum showing a mild negative correlation, we found no correlations between age and SUVmean using the gray matter, white matter, and choroid plexus (r = − 0.280, P = 0.047). Only the SUVR-choroid plexus was able to differentiate between the WHO grades (Grade II vs. III, P = 0.035; grade III vs. IV, P < 0.001; grade II vs. IV, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models found that the SUVR-choroid plexus and IDH mutation were statistically significant for predicting OS.

Conclusion

Of the different reference regions used for grading cerebral gliomas, the choroid plexus was found to be the most optimal. In addition, the SUV ratio is useful to predict the overall survival in the model with the choroid plexus as a reference region.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Deford-Watts LM, Mintz A, Kridel SJ. The potential of (1)(1)C-acetate PET for monitoring the fatty acid synthesis pathway in tumors. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2013;14:300–12.CrossRef Deford-Watts LM, Mintz A, Kridel SJ. The potential of (1)(1)C-acetate PET for monitoring the fatty acid synthesis pathway in tumors. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2013;14:300–12.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim S, Kim D, Kim SH, Park MA, Chang JH, Yun M. The roles of (11)C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1012–20.CrossRef Kim S, Kim D, Kim SH, Park MA, Chang JH, Yun M. The roles of (11)C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1012–20.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Liu RS, Chang CP, Chu LS, Chu YK, Hsieh HJ, Chang CW, et al. PET imaging of brain astrocytoma with 1-11C-acetate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:420–7.CrossRef Liu RS, Chang CP, Chu LS, Chu YK, Hsieh HJ, Chang CW, et al. PET imaging of brain astrocytoma with 1-11C-acetate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:420–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kimura N, Kameyama R, Kawai N, Hatakeyama T, et al. 11C-acetate PET in the evaluation of brain glioma: comparison with 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10:281–7.CrossRef Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kimura N, Kameyama R, Kawai N, Hatakeyama T, et al. 11C-acetate PET in the evaluation of brain glioma: comparison with 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10:281–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tsuchida T, Takeuchi H, Okazawa H, Tsujikawa T, Fujibayashi Y. Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35:171–6.CrossRef Tsuchida T, Takeuchi H, Okazawa H, Tsujikawa T, Fujibayashi Y. Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35:171–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Strazielle N, Ghersi-Egea JF. Physiology of blood-brain interfaces in relation to brain disposition of small compounds and macromolecules. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:1473–91.CrossRef Strazielle N, Ghersi-Egea JF. Physiology of blood-brain interfaces in relation to brain disposition of small compounds and macromolecules. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:1473–91.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Guermazi A, De Kerviler E, Zagdanski AM, Frija J. Diagnostic imaging of choroid plexus disease. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:503–16.CrossRef Guermazi A, De Kerviler E, Zagdanski AM, Frija J. Diagnostic imaging of choroid plexus disease. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:503–16.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference O'Tuama LA, Phillips PC, Smith QR, Uno Y, Dannals RF, Wilson AA, et al. L-methionine uptake by human cerebral cortex: maturation from infancy to old age. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:16–22.PubMed O'Tuama LA, Phillips PC, Smith QR, Uno Y, Dannals RF, Wilson AA, et al. L-methionine uptake by human cerebral cortex: maturation from infancy to old age. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:16–22.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Uda T, Tsuyuguchi N, Terakawa Y, Takami T, Ohata K. Evaluation of the accumulation of (11)C-methionine with standardized uptake value in the normal brain. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:219–22.CrossRef Uda T, Tsuyuguchi N, Terakawa Y, Takami T, Ohata K. Evaluation of the accumulation of (11)C-methionine with standardized uptake value in the normal brain. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:219–22.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Choroid Plexus as the Best Reference Region for Standardized Uptake Value Analysis on C11-Acetate PET/CT for Grading and Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Cerebral Gliomas
Authors
Dongwoo Kim
Arthur Cho
Sang Hyun Hwang
KwanHyeong Jo
Jong Hee Chang
Mijin Yun
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1869-3474
Electronic ISSN: 1869-3482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-020-00672-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6/2020 Go to the issue