Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

The roles of 11C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma

Authors: Soyoung Kim, Dongwoo Kim, Se Hoon Kim, Mi-ae Park, Jong Hee Chang, Mijin Yun

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This prospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical values of 11C–acetate positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in predicting histologic grades and survival in patients with cerebral glioma.

Methods

Seventy-three patients with surgically confirmed cerebral gliomas (19 grade II, 21 grade III, and 33 grade IV) who underwent 11C–acetate PET/CT before surgery were included. Tumor-to-choroid plexus ratio (TCR), which was defined as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of tumors to the mean SUV of choroid plexus, was compared between three World Health Organization (WHO) grade groups. Moreover, metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) were calculated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences in survival between groups were assessed using the log-rank test.

Results

Median TCR was 1.20 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.14 to 1.4) in grade II, 1.65 (IQR, 1.26 to 1.79) in grade III, and 2.53 (IQR, 1.93 to 3.30) in grade IV gliomas. Significant differences in TCR were seen among the three WHO grade groups (P < 0.001). In Cox regression analysis including TCR, MTV, molecular markers, and other clinical factors, TCR was prognostic for PFS (P = 0.016) and TCR and MTV were prognostic for OS (P = 0.024 [TCR], P = 0.030 [MTV]). PFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with a TCR ≥ 1.6 than in those with a TCR < 1.6. OS were significantly shorter in patients with a MTV ≥ 1 than in those with a TCR < 1.

Conclusions

TCR on 11C–acetate PET/CT significantly differed between low- and high-grade cerebral gliomas, and it showed the capability to further differentiate grade III from grade IV tumors. TCR and MTV were independent prognostic factors and predicted survival better than did the WHO grade.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, Liu M, Blanda R, Kromer C, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;17(Suppl 4):iv1–iv62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, Liu M, Blanda R, Kromer C, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;17(Suppl 4):iv1–iv62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20.CrossRefPubMed Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Singhal T, Narayanan TK, Jacobs MP, Bal C, Mantil JC. 11C-methionine PET for grading and prognostication in gliomas: a comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and contrast enhancement on MRI. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(11):1709–15.CrossRefPubMed Singhal T, Narayanan TK, Jacobs MP, Bal C, Mantil JC. 11C-methionine PET for grading and prognostication in gliomas: a comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and contrast enhancement on MRI. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(11):1709–15.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lopci E, Riva M, Olivari L, Raneri F, Soffietti R, Piccardo A, et al. Prognostic value of molecular and imaging biomarkers in patients with supratentorial glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(7):1155–64.CrossRefPubMed Lopci E, Riva M, Olivari L, Raneri F, Soffietti R, Piccardo A, et al. Prognostic value of molecular and imaging biomarkers in patients with supratentorial glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(7):1155–64.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bangiyev L, Rossi Espagnet MC, Young R, Shepherd T, Knopp E, Friedman K, et al. Adult brain tumor imaging: state of the art. Semin Roentgenol. 2014;49(1):39–52.CrossRefPubMed Bangiyev L, Rossi Espagnet MC, Young R, Shepherd T, Knopp E, Friedman K, et al. Adult brain tumor imaging: state of the art. Semin Roentgenol. 2014;49(1):39–52.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Langen KJ, Galldiks N, Hattingen E, Shah NJ. Advances in neuro-oncology imaging. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(5):279–89.CrossRefPubMed Langen KJ, Galldiks N, Hattingen E, Shah NJ. Advances in neuro-oncology imaging. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(5):279–89.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wong TZ, van der Westhuizen GJ, Coleman RE. Positron emission tomography imaging of brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2002;12(4):615–26.CrossRefPubMed Wong TZ, van der Westhuizen GJ, Coleman RE. Positron emission tomography imaging of brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2002;12(4):615–26.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Padma MV, Said S, Jacobs M, Hwang DR, Dunigan K, Satter M, et al. Prediction of pathology and survival by FDG PET in gliomas. J Neuro-Oncol. 2003;64(3):227–37.CrossRef Padma MV, Said S, Jacobs M, Hwang DR, Dunigan K, Satter M, et al. Prediction of pathology and survival by FDG PET in gliomas. J Neuro-Oncol. 2003;64(3):227–37.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jacobs AH, Thomas A, Kracht LW, Li H, Dittmar C, Garlip G, et al. 18F-fluoro-l-thymidine and 11C-methylmethionine as markers of increased transport and proliferation in brain tumors. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(12):1948–58.PubMed Jacobs AH, Thomas A, Kracht LW, Li H, Dittmar C, Garlip G, et al. 18F-fluoro-l-thymidine and 11C-methylmethionine as markers of increased transport and proliferation in brain tumors. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(12):1948–58.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Miyake K, Shinomiya A, Okada M, Hatakeyama T, Kawai N, Tamiya T. Usefulness of FDG, MET and FLT-PET studies for the management of human gliomas. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:205818.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miyake K, Shinomiya A, Okada M, Hatakeyama T, Kawai N, Tamiya T. Usefulness of FDG, MET and FLT-PET studies for the management of human gliomas. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:205818.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Singhal T, Narayanan TK, Jain V, Mukherjee J, Mantil J. 11C-l-methionine positron emission tomography in the clinical management of cerebral gliomas. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10(1):1–18.CrossRefPubMed Singhal T, Narayanan TK, Jain V, Mukherjee J, Mantil J. 11C-l-methionine positron emission tomography in the clinical management of cerebral gliomas. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10(1):1–18.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Oyama N, Akino H, Kanamaru H, Suzuki Y, Muramoto S, Yonekura Y, et al. 11C-acetate PET imaging of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(2):181–6.PubMed Oyama N, Akino H, Kanamaru H, Suzuki Y, Muramoto S, Yonekura Y, et al. 11C-acetate PET imaging of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(2):181–6.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ho CL, Yu SC, Yeung DW. 11C-acetate PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver masses. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(2):213–21.PubMed Ho CL, Yu SC, Yeung DW. 11C-acetate PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver masses. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(2):213–21.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Liu RS, Chang CP, Chu LS, Chu YK, Hsieh HJ, Chang CW, et al. PET imaging of brain astrocytoma with 1-11C-acetate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(4):420–7.CrossRefPubMed Liu RS, Chang CP, Chu LS, Chu YK, Hsieh HJ, Chang CW, et al. PET imaging of brain astrocytoma with 1-11C-acetate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(4):420–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tsuchida T, Takeuchi H, Okazawa H, Tsujikawa T, Fujibayashi Y. Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35(2):171–6.CrossRefPubMed Tsuchida T, Takeuchi H, Okazawa H, Tsujikawa T, Fujibayashi Y. Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35(2):171–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kimura N, Kameyama R, Kawai N, Hatakeyama T, et al. 11C-acetate PET in the evaluation of brain glioma: comparison with 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10(5):281–7.CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kimura N, Kameyama R, Kawai N, Hatakeyama T, et al. 11C-acetate PET in the evaluation of brain glioma: comparison with 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10(5):281–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Manabe O, Hattori N, Yamaguchi S, Hirata K, Kobayashi K, Terasaka S, et al. Oligodendroglial component complicates the prediction of tumour grading with metabolic imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(6):896–904.CrossRefPubMed Manabe O, Hattori N, Yamaguchi S, Hirata K, Kobayashi K, Terasaka S, et al. Oligodendroglial component complicates the prediction of tumour grading with metabolic imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(6):896–904.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Waniewski RA, Martin DL. Preferential utilization of acetate by astrocytes is attributable to transport. J Neurosci. 1998;18(14):5225–33.CrossRefPubMed Waniewski RA, Martin DL. Preferential utilization of acetate by astrocytes is attributable to transport. J Neurosci. 1998;18(14):5225–33.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dienel GA, Popp D, Drew PD, Ball K, Krisht A, Cruz NF. Preferential labeling of glial and meningial brain tumors with [2-(14)C]acetate. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(8):1243–50.PubMed Dienel GA, Popp D, Drew PD, Ball K, Krisht A, Cruz NF. Preferential labeling of glial and meningial brain tumors with [2-(14)C]acetate. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(8):1243–50.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Mashimo T, Pichumani K, Vemireddy V, Hatanpaa KJ, Singh DK, Sirasanagandla S, et al. Acetate is a bioenergetic substrate for human glioblastoma and brain metastases. Cell. 2014;159(7):1603–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mashimo T, Pichumani K, Vemireddy V, Hatanpaa KJ, Singh DK, Sirasanagandla S, et al. Acetate is a bioenergetic substrate for human glioblastoma and brain metastases. Cell. 2014;159(7):1603–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Sanai N, Berger MS. Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(4):753–64. discussion 264-6CrossRefPubMed Sanai N, Berger MS. Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(4):753–64. discussion 264-6CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ito K, Matsuda H, Kubota K. Imaging spectrum and pitfalls of (11)C-Methionine positron emission tomography in a series of patients with intracranial lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17(3):424–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ito K, Matsuda H, Kubota K. Imaging spectrum and pitfalls of (11)C-Methionine positron emission tomography in a series of patients with intracranial lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17(3):424–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Iversen P, Mouridsen K, Hansen MB, Jensen SB, Sorensen M, Bak LK, et al. Oxidative metabolism of astrocytes is not reduced in hepatic encephalopathy: a PET study with [(11)C]acetate in humans. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iversen P, Mouridsen K, Hansen MB, Jensen SB, Sorensen M, Bak LK, et al. Oxidative metabolism of astrocytes is not reduced in hepatic encephalopathy: a PET study with [(11)C]acetate in humans. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The roles of 11C-acetate PET/CT in predicting tumor differentiation and survival in patients with cerebral glioma
Authors
Soyoung Kim
Dongwoo Kim
Se Hoon Kim
Mi-ae Park
Jong Hee Chang
Mijin Yun
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3948-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6/2018 Go to the issue