Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Literature
1.
Yeom JH, Oh MK, Shin WJ, Ahn DW, Jeon WJ, Cho SY. Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway. Can J Anesth 2017; 64: 1176-81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, et al. A comparison of glidescope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 144-8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Goodine C, Sparrow K, Asselin M, Hung D, Hung O. The alignment approach to nasotracheal intubation. Can J Anesth 2016; 63: 991-2.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Gu Y, Robert J, Kovacs G, et al. A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial. Can J Anesth 2016; 63: 928-37.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Piepho T, Thierbach A, Werner C. Nasotracheal intubation: look before you leap. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 859-60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Not which forceps, but whether forceps?
Author
Timothy P. Turkstra, MD, B. Eng, M. Eng, P. Eng, FRCPC
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1114-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2018 Go to the issue

Reports of Original Investigations

A 25-year retrospective analysis of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification: did we “up-code” young obese patients when obesity was not yet considered a disease?

Review Article/Brief Review

Anesthesia for interventional pulmonology procedures: a review of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopy

Correspondence

Reappraisal of the Canadian Critical Care Society’s position on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment

Editorials

Ensuring all falling trees are heard: the importance of publishing all research

In reply

In reply: Not which forceps, but whether forceps?

Images in Anesthesia

Bromage motor blockade score – a score that has lasted more than a lifetime