Published in:
01-07-2018 | In reply
In reply: Not which forceps, but whether forceps?
Authors:
Jong H. Yeom, MD, PhD, Mi K. Oh, MD, Woo J. Shin, MD, PhD, Dae W. Ahn, MD, Woo J. Jeon, MD, PhD, Sang Y. Cho, MD, PhD
Published in:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
|
Issue 7/2018
Login to get access
Excerpt
We appreciate the keen interest and thoughtful comments by Dr. Turkstra
1 on our study
2 where we found that using a forceps-guided tube exchanger could be advantageous when using the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope (GVL; Verathon Medical Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) for oral endotracheal tube (ETT) intubation. The reason for an advantage might be the flexibility and pliability of a tube exchanger. Another study of nasotracheal intubation by Lim
et al.
3 showed that the pliable and flexible nasogastric tube passed preferentially through the lower aspect of the nasal passage with a preformed ETT easily advancing towards the laryngeal inlet. We hypothesized that the flexibility and pliability of a tube exchanger would be effective for nasotracheal intubation using a GVL.
4 To apply the same conditions for the two groups, forceps were used in all patients because insertion and removal of the forceps consumed some time. …