Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2018

01-07-2018 | In reply

In reply: Not which forceps, but whether forceps?

Authors: Jong H. Yeom, MD, PhD, Mi K. Oh, MD, Woo J. Shin, MD, PhD, Dae W. Ahn, MD, Woo J. Jeon, MD, PhD, Sang Y. Cho, MD, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

We appreciate the keen interest and thoughtful comments by Dr. Turkstra1 on our study2 where we found that using a forceps-guided tube exchanger could be advantageous when using the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope (GVL; Verathon Medical Inc., Bothell, WA, USA) for oral endotracheal tube (ETT) intubation. The reason for an advantage might be the flexibility and pliability of a tube exchanger. Another study of nasotracheal intubation by Lim et al.3 showed that the pliable and flexible nasogastric tube passed preferentially through the lower aspect of the nasal passage with a preformed ETT easily advancing towards the laryngeal inlet. We hypothesized that the flexibility and pliability of a tube exchanger would be effective for nasotracheal intubation using a GVL.4 To apply the same conditions for the two groups, forceps were used in all patients because insertion and removal of the forceps consumed some time. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Yeom JH, Oh MK, Shin WJ, Ahn DW, Jeon WJ, Cho SY. Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway. Can J Anesth 2017; 64: 1176-81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeom JH, Oh MK, Shin WJ, Ahn DW, Jeon WJ, Cho SY. Randomized comparison of the effectiveness of nasal intubation using a GlideScope with Magill forceps versus vascular forceps in patients with a normal airway. Can J Anesth 2017; 64: 1176-81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Lim CW, Min SW, Kim CS, Chang JE, Park JE, Hwang JY. The use of a nasogastric tube to facilitate nasotracheal intubation: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 591-7.CrossRefPubMed Lim CW, Min SW, Kim CS, Chang JE, Park JE, Hwang JY. The use of a nasogastric tube to facilitate nasotracheal intubation: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 591-7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim YC, Lee SH, Noh GJ, et al. Thermosoftening treatment of the nasotracheal tube before intubation can reduce epistaxis and nasal damage. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 698-701.CrossRefPubMed Kim YC, Lee SH, Noh GJ, et al. Thermosoftening treatment of the nasotracheal tube before intubation can reduce epistaxis and nasal damage. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 698-701.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, et al. A comparison of GlideScope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 144-8.CrossRefPubMed Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, et al. A comparison of GlideScope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 144-8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
In reply: Not which forceps, but whether forceps?
Authors
Jong H. Yeom, MD, PhD
Mi K. Oh, MD
Woo J. Shin, MD, PhD
Dae W. Ahn, MD
Woo J. Jeon, MD, PhD
Sang Y. Cho, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1115-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2018 Go to the issue