Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Breast Cancer Reports 2/2018

01-06-2018 | Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Estimating Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk

Author: Maureen O’Donnell

Published in: Current Breast Cancer Reports | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of review

Accurate estimates of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk are necessary around the time a first breast cancer is diagnosed to aid surgical decision-making. This review will discuss the known risk factors for contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and present methods for calculating CBC risk that can be utilized when breast surgeons counsel patients.

Recent findings

In addition to the well-known factors that impact contralateral breast cancer risk, such as BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carrier status and history of chest wall radiation, other factors that affect CBC risk are being better defined. Recent studies that take into account important covariates in contralateral breast cancer risk, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier status, family history, and systemic treatment, are further improving estimates of contralateral risk. Recent studies show family history, especially of breast cancer in a young relative or of bilateral breast cancer, hormone receptor status, lobular histology, and breast density are important in accurately estimating contralateral breast cancer risk. The Manchester formula, a pen and paper calculation for contralateral breast cancer risk estimation, and CBCRisk, a recently developed online CBC risk calculator, are two tools now available to clinicians.

Summary

Despite a decreasing incidence of contralateral breast cancer over the last few decades, there has been a steady increase in the number of women undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). The reasons for this are multifactorial, but fear of a contralateral breast cancer and a tendency to overestimate the risk of a contralateral breast cancer are two factors. Therefore, a critical element in decision-making for women considering CPM is having an accurate estimate of contralateral breast cancer risk. Models for estimating contralateral breast cancer risk are not widely used, but are available.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, Ries LAG, Hacker DG, Edwards BK, Tucker MA, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds). New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973-2000. National Cancer Institute. NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD, 2006. Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, Ries LAG, Hacker DG, Edwards BK, Tucker MA, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds). New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973-2000. National Cancer Institute. NIH Publ. No. 05-5302. National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD, 2006.
3.
go back to reference Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M, Buzdar A, Howell A, Dowsett M, et al. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10 year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:1135–41.CrossRefPubMed Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M, Buzdar A, Howell A, Dowsett M, et al. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10 year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:1135–41.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15 year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet. 2005;365:1687–717.CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15 year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet. 2005;365:1687–717.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kurian AW, McClure LA, John EM, et al. Second primary breast cancer occurrence according to hormone receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1058–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurian AW, McClure LA, John EM, et al. Second primary breast cancer occurrence according to hormone receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1058–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, Gurevich I, Stempel M, Sampson M, et al. Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2158–64.CrossRefPubMed King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, Gurevich I, Stempel M, Sampson M, et al. Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2158–64.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.CrossRefPubMed Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, Arrington A, Abraham A, Morris TJ, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–7.CrossRefPubMed Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, Arrington A, Abraham A, Morris TJ, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Murphy JA, Milner TD, O’Donoghue JM. Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:e262–9.CrossRefPubMed Murphy JA, Milner TD, O’Donoghue JM. Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:e262–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Han E, Johnson N, Glissmeyer M, Wagie T, Carey B, DelaMelena T, et al. Increasing incidence of bilateral mastectomies: the patient perspective. Am J Surg. 2011;201(5):615–8.CrossRefPubMed Han E, Johnson N, Glissmeyer M, Wagie T, Carey B, DelaMelena T, et al. Increasing incidence of bilateral mastectomies: the patient perspective. Am J Surg. 2011;201(5):615–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, et al. Diagnostic breast magnetic reasonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1597–605.CrossRefPubMed Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, et al. Diagnostic breast magnetic reasonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1597–605.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference • Jagsi R, Hawley ST, Griffith KA, Janz NK, Kurian AW, Ward KC, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy decisions in a population based sample of patients with early stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):274–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4749. This study demonstrates surgeon recommendation regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy does impact surgical decision making. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral • Jagsi R, Hawley ST, Griffith KA, Janz NK, Kurian AW, Ward KC, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy decisions in a population based sample of patients with early stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):274–82. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2016.​4749. This study demonstrates surgeon recommendation regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy does impact surgical decision making. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Janz NK, Hawley ST, et al. Communication of recurrence risk estimates to patients diagnosed with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(5):684–6.CrossRef Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Janz NK, Hawley ST, et al. Communication of recurrence risk estimates to patients diagnosed with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(5):684–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference •• Van den Broek AJ, van’t Veer LJ, Hooning MJ, et al. Impact of age at primary breast cancer on contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(5):409–18. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3942. This study demonstrates that age is a strong factor for cumulative CBC risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and is evidence that age-specific risk estimates should be used when counseling patients CrossRefPubMed •• Van den Broek AJ, van’t Veer LJ, Hooning MJ, et al. Impact of age at primary breast cancer on contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(5):409–18. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2015.​62.​3942. This study demonstrates that age is a strong factor for cumulative CBC risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and is evidence that age-specific risk estimates should be used when counseling patients CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Reiner AS, John EM, Brooks JD, Lynch CF, Bernstein L, Mellemkjær L, et al. Risk of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer in noncarriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with a family history of breast cancer: a report from the Women’s Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:433–9.CrossRefPubMed Reiner AS, John EM, Brooks JD, Lynch CF, Bernstein L, Mellemkjær L, et al. Risk of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer in noncarriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with a family history of breast cancer: a report from the Women’s Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:433–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lizarraga IM, Sugg SL, Weigel RJ, Scott-Conner CE. Review of the risk factors for the development of contralateral breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2013;206:704–8.CrossRefPubMed Lizarraga IM, Sugg SL, Weigel RJ, Scott-Conner CE. Review of the risk factors for the development of contralateral breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2013;206:704–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hafty BG, Harrold E, Khan AJ, et al. Outcome of conservatively managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet. 2002;359(1471–77) Hafty BG, Harrold E, Khan AJ, et al. Outcome of conservatively managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet. 2002;359(1471–77)
23.
go back to reference Travis LB, Hill DA, Dores GM, Gospodarowicz M, van Leeuwen FE, Holowaty E, et al. Breast cancer following radiotherapy and chemotherapy among young women with Hodgkin disease. JAMA. 2003;290(4):465–75.CrossRefPubMed Travis LB, Hill DA, Dores GM, Gospodarowicz M, van Leeuwen FE, Holowaty E, et al. Breast cancer following radiotherapy and chemotherapy among young women with Hodgkin disease. JAMA. 2003;290(4):465–75.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bernstein JL, Thompson WD, Risch N, Holford TR. Risk factors predicting the incidence of second primary breast cancer among women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136(8):925–36.CrossRefPubMed Bernstein JL, Thompson WD, Risch N, Holford TR. Risk factors predicting the incidence of second primary breast cancer among women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136(8):925–36.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Estimating Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk
Author
Maureen O’Donnell
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Breast Cancer Reports / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1943-4588
Electronic ISSN: 1943-4596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-018-0271-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Current Breast Cancer Reports 2/2018 Go to the issue

Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Breast Density and the Importance of Supplemental Screening

Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Optimizing Surgical Treatment for Phyllodes Tumor

Translational Research (RL Aft, Section Editor)

Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer: the New Frontier

Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Managing Patient with Mutations in PALB2, CHEK2, or ATM

Translational Research (RL Aft, Section Editor)

HER2 Activating Mutations in Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Recent Trends in Local-Regional Recurrence Rates: Implications for Therapeutic Intervention

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine