Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 12/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Review Article

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: artefacts for clinicians

Authors: A. W. M. van der Graaf, P. Bhagirath, S. Ghoerbien, M. J. W. Götte

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

In recent years, the clinical importance of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has increased dramatically. As a consequence, more clinicians need to become familiar with this imaging modality, including its technical challenges. MR images are obtained through a physical process of proton excitation and the reception of resonating signals. Besides these physical principles, the motion of the heart and diaphragm, together with the presence of fast flowing blood in the vicinity, pose challenges to the acquisition of high-quality diagnostic images and are an important cause of image artefacts. Artefacts may render images non-diagnostic and measurements unreliable, and most artefacts can only be corrected during the acquisition itself. Hence, timely and accurate recognition of the type of artefact is crucial. This paper provides a concise description of the CMR acquisition process and the underlying MR physics for clinical cardiologists and trainees. Frequently observed CMR artefacts are illustrated and possible adjustments to minimise or eliminate these artefacts are explained.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: twenty-first century solutions in cardiology. Clin Med. 2003;3:273–8.PubMedCrossRef Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: twenty-first century solutions in cardiology. Clin Med. 2003;3:273–8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet. 2003;1;361(9355):374–9.CrossRef Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet. 2003;1;361(9355):374–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ferreira PF, Gatehouse PD, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;22:15–41. Ferreira PF, Gatehouse PD, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;22:15–41.
4.
go back to reference Plein S, Greenwood JP, Ridgway JP. Common artefacts. In cardiovascular MR manual. London: Springer 2011;167-183. Plein S, Greenwood JP, Ridgway JP. Common artefacts. In cardiovascular MR manual. London: Springer 2011;167-183.
5.
go back to reference Bruder O, Wagner A, Lombardi M, et al. European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry multi-national results from 57 centers in 15 countries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;18(15):1–9. Bruder O, Wagner A, Lombardi M, et al. European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (EuroCMR) registry multi-national results from 57 centers in 15 countries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;18(15):1–9.
6.
go back to reference Balaban RS, Peters DC. Basic principles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. In: Manning WJ, Pennel DJ, editors. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance. 2nd ed. Philidelphia: Saunders; 2010. p. 1–18. Balaban RS, Peters DC. Basic principles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. In: Manning WJ, Pennel DJ, editors. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance. 2nd ed. Philidelphia: Saunders; 2010. p. 1–18.
7.
go back to reference Ridgway JP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: part I. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;30;12(71):1–28. Ridgway JP. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: part I. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;30;12(71):1–28.
8.
go back to reference Prost JE, Wehrli FW, Drayer B, Froelich J, Hearshen D, Plewes D. SAR reduced pulse sequences. Magn Reson Imaging. 1988;6(2):125–30.PubMedCrossRef Prost JE, Wehrli FW, Drayer B, Froelich J, Hearshen D, Plewes D. SAR reduced pulse sequences. Magn Reson Imaging. 1988;6(2):125–30.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Murbach M, Neufeld E, Kainz W, Pruessmann KP, Kuster N. Whole-body and local RF absorption in human models as a function of anatomy and position within 1.5 T MR body coil. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(2):839–45.CrossRef Murbach M, Neufeld E, Kainz W, Pruessmann KP, Kuster N. Whole-body and local RF absorption in human models as a function of anatomy and position within 1.5 T MR body coil. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(2):839–45.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wilkoff BL, Bello D, Taborsky M. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(1):65–73.PubMedCrossRef Wilkoff BL, Bello D, Taborsky M. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(1):65–73.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pusey E, Yoon C, Anselmo ML, Lufkin RB. Aliasing artifacts in MR imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1988;12(4):219–24.PubMedCrossRef Pusey E, Yoon C, Anselmo ML, Lufkin RB. Aliasing artifacts in MR imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1988;12(4):219–24.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goldfarb JW. The SENSE ghost: field-of-view restrictions for SENSE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20(6):1046–51.PubMedCrossRef Goldfarb JW. The SENSE ghost: field-of-view restrictions for SENSE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20(6):1046–51.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bydder M. Parallel imaging. In: Hashemi RH, Bradley WG, Lisanti CJ, editors. MRI the basics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 279–83. Bydder M. Parallel imaging. In: Hashemi RH, Bradley WG, Lisanti CJ, editors. MRI the basics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 279–83.
14.
go back to reference Henk CB, Grampp S, Koller J, et al. Elimination of errors caused by first-order aliasing in velocity encoded cine-MR measurements of postoperative jets after aortic coarctation: in vitro and in vivo validation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(6):1523–31.PubMedCrossRef Henk CB, Grampp S, Koller J, et al. Elimination of errors caused by first-order aliasing in velocity encoded cine-MR measurements of postoperative jets after aortic coarctation: in vitro and in vivo validation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(6):1523–31.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Barish MA, Jara H. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999;7(2):289–301.PubMed Barish MA, Jara H. Motion artifact control in body MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999;7(2):289–301.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Matsumoto H, Matsuda T, Miyamoto K, Nakatsuma K, Sugahara M, Shimada T. Feasibility of free-breathing late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular MRI for assessment of myocardial infarction: navigator-gated versus single-shot imaging. Int J Cardiol. 2013;20;168(1):94–9.CrossRef Matsumoto H, Matsuda T, Miyamoto K, Nakatsuma K, Sugahara M, Shimada T. Feasibility of free-breathing late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular MRI for assessment of myocardial infarction: navigator-gated versus single-shot imaging. Int J Cardiol. 2013;20;168(1):94–9.CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Graves MJ, Mitchell DG. Body MRI artifacts in clinical practice: a physicist’s and radiologist’s perspective. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(2):269–87.PubMedCrossRef Graves MJ, Mitchell DG. Body MRI artifacts in clinical practice: a physicist’s and radiologist’s perspective. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(2):269–87.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gerber BL, Raman SV, Nayak K, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;28(10):1–18. Gerber BL, Raman SV, Nayak K, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;28(10):1–18.
20.
go back to reference Sasaki T, Hansford R, Zviman MM, et al. Quantitative assessment of artifacts on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(6):662–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sasaki T, Hansford R, Zviman MM, et al. Quantitative assessment of artifacts on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(6):662–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: artefacts for clinicians
Authors
A. W. M. van der Graaf
P. Bhagirath
S. Ghoerbien
M. J. W. Götte
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0623-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Netherlands Heart Journal 12/2014 Go to the issue