Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 5/2021

Open Access 01-10-2021 | Computed Tomography | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Normal imaging findings after aortic valve implantation on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography

Authors: Ali R. Wahadat, MD, Wilco Tanis, MD, PhD, Asbjørn M. Scholtens, MD, Margreet Bekker, MD, Laura H. Graven, MD, Laurens E. Swart, MD, PhD, Annemarie M. den Harder, MD, PhD, Marnix G. E. H. Lam, MD, PhD, Linda M. de Heer, MD, PhD, Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink, MD, PhD, Ricardo P. J. Budde, MD, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To determine the normal perivalvular 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) within one year after aortic prosthetic heart valve (PHV) implantation.

Methods

Patients with uncomplicated aortic PHV implantation were prospectively included and underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at either 5 (± 1) weeks (group 1), 12 (± 2) weeks (group 2) or 52 (± 8) weeks (group 3) after implantation. 18F-FDG uptake around the PHV was scored qualitatively (none/low/intermediate/high) and quantitatively by measuring the maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) and target to background ratio (SUVratio).

Results

In total, 37 patients (group 1: n = 12, group 2: n = 12, group 3: n = 13) (mean age 66 ± 8 years) were prospectively included. Perivalvular 18F-FDG uptake was low (8/12 (67%)) and intermediate (4/12 (33%)) in group 1, low (7/12 (58%)) and intermediate (5/12 (42%)) in group 2, and low (8/13 (62%)) and intermediate (5/13 (38%)) in group 3 (P = 0.91). SUVmax was 4.1 ± 0.7, 4.6 ± 0.9 and 3.8 ± 0.7 (mean ± SD, P = 0.08), and SUVratio was 2.0 [1.9 to 2.2], 2.0 [1.8 to 2.6], and 1.9 [1.7 to 2.0] (median [IQR], P = 0.81) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusion

Non-infected aortic PHV have similar low to intermediate perivalvular 18F-FDG uptake with similar SUVmax and SUVratio at 5, 12, and 52 weeks after implantation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Habib G, Derumeaux G, Avierinos JF, Casalta JP, Jamal F, Volot F, et al. Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2023-9.CrossRef Habib G, Derumeaux G, Avierinos JF, Casalta JP, Jamal F, Volot F, et al. Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2023-9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 2015;36:3075-128.CrossRef Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 2015;36:3075-128.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Swart LE, Gomes A, Scholtens AM, Sinha B, Tanis W, Lam M, et al. Improving the diagnostic performance of (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in prosthetic heart valve endocarditis. Circulation 2018;138:1412-27.CrossRef Swart LE, Gomes A, Scholtens AM, Sinha B, Tanis W, Lam M, et al. Improving the diagnostic performance of (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in prosthetic heart valve endocarditis. Circulation 2018;138:1412-27.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Juneau D, Golfam M, Hazra S, Erthal F, Zuckier LS, Bernick J, et al. Molecular Imaging for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2018;253:183-8.CrossRef Juneau D, Golfam M, Hazra S, Erthal F, Zuckier LS, Bernick J, et al. Molecular Imaging for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2018;253:183-8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mahmood M, Kendi AT, Ajmal S, Farid S, O’Horo JC, Chareonthaitawee P, et al. Meta-analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Nucl Cardiol 2019;26:922-35.CrossRef Mahmood M, Kendi AT, Ajmal S, Farid S, O’Horo JC, Chareonthaitawee P, et al. Meta-analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Nucl Cardiol 2019;26:922-35.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Scholtens AM, Budde RPJ, Lam M, Verberne HJ. FDG PET/CT in prosthetic heart valve endocarditis: There is no need to wait. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:1540-1.CrossRef Scholtens AM, Budde RPJ, Lam M, Verberne HJ. FDG PET/CT in prosthetic heart valve endocarditis: There is no need to wait. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:1540-1.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mathieu C, Mikail N, Benali K, Iung B, Duval X, Nataf P, et al. Characterization of (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake pattern in noninfected prosthetic heart valves. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:e005585.PubMed Mathieu C, Mikail N, Benali K, Iung B, Duval X, Nataf P, et al. Characterization of (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake pattern in noninfected prosthetic heart valves. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:e005585.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Roque A, Pizzi MN, Fernandez-Hidalgo N, Permanyer E, Cuellar-Calabria H, Romero-Farina G, et al. Morpho-metabolic post-surgical patterns of non-infected prosthetic heart valves by [18F]FDG PET/CTA: “normality” is a possible diagnosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;21:24-33.CrossRef Roque A, Pizzi MN, Fernandez-Hidalgo N, Permanyer E, Cuellar-Calabria H, Romero-Farina G, et al. Morpho-metabolic post-surgical patterns of non-infected prosthetic heart valves by [18F]FDG PET/CTA: “normality” is a possible diagnosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;21:24-33.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Coulden R, Chung P, Sonnex E, Ibrahim Q, Maguire C, Abele J. Suppression of myocardial 18F-FDG uptake with a preparatory “Atkins-style” low-carbohydrate diet. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2221-8.CrossRef Coulden R, Chung P, Sonnex E, Ibrahim Q, Maguire C, Abele J. Suppression of myocardial 18F-FDG uptake with a preparatory “Atkins-style” low-carbohydrate diet. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2221-8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kapoor V, McCook BM, Torok FS. An introduction to PET-CT imaging. Radiographics 2004;24:523-43.CrossRef Kapoor V, McCook BM, Torok FS. An introduction to PET-CT imaging. Radiographics 2004;24:523-43.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Scholtens AM, Swart LE, Verberne HJ, Tanis W, Lam MG, Budde RP. Confounders in FDG-PET/CT imaging of suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:1462-5.CrossRef Scholtens AM, Swart LE, Verberne HJ, Tanis W, Lam MG, Budde RP. Confounders in FDG-PET/CT imaging of suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:1462-5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Scholtens AM, Verberne HJ, Budde RP, Lam MG. Additional heparin preadministration improves cardiac glucose metabolism suppression over low-carbohydrate diet alone in (1)(8)F-FDG PET imaging. J Nucl Med 2016;57:568-73.CrossRef Scholtens AM, Verberne HJ, Budde RP, Lam MG. Additional heparin preadministration improves cardiac glucose metabolism suppression over low-carbohydrate diet alone in (1)(8)F-FDG PET imaging. J Nucl Med 2016;57:568-73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Normal imaging findings after aortic valve implantation on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography
Authors
Ali R. Wahadat, MD
Wilco Tanis, MD, PhD
Asbjørn M. Scholtens, MD
Margreet Bekker, MD
Laura H. Graven, MD
Laurens E. Swart, MD, PhD
Annemarie M. den Harder, MD, PhD
Marnix G. E. H. Lam, MD, PhD
Linda M. de Heer, MD, PhD
Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink, MD, PhD
Ricardo P. J. Budde, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-02025-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 5/2021 Go to the issue