Top

Published in:

01-06-2012 | Advances in Nonnuclear Imaging Technologies

Prognostic value of cardiovascular CT: Is coronary artery calcium screening enough? The added value of CCTA

Authors: Erick Alexanderson, MD, Nadia Canseco-León, MD, Fernando Iñarra, MD, Aloha Meave, MD, Damini Dey, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 3/2012

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the primary cause of death in adults in the United States. Only 50% of patients who present with a myocardial infarction have a prior history of CAD. Non-invasive cardiac imaging tests have been developed to diagnose CAD. Current guidelines and systematic reviews have tried to determine the prognostic value of the coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and the coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for major adverse cardiovascular events. Several studies support the roles of CCTA and CAC scoring for the diagnosis of CAD in asymptomatic patients. Further studies are needed to confirm the superior role of CCTA over CAC scoring in symptomatic patients.

Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 1995;92:2157-62.PubMed

O’Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF, Greenland P, Grundy SM, Hachamovitch R, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000;102:126-40.PubMed

Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldin G, Greenland P, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114:1761-91.PubMedCrossRef

Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer C. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475-97.PubMedCrossRef

Mautner GC, Mautner SL, Froehlich J, Feuerstein IM, Proschan MA, Roberts WC, et al. Coronary artery calcification: Assessment with electron-beam CT and histomorphometric correlation. Radiology 1994;192:619-23.PubMed

Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ, Raggi P. Coronary artery disease: Improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology 1998;208:807-14.PubMed

McCollough CH, Ulzheimer S, Halliburton SS, Shanneik K, White RD, Kalender WA. Coronary artery calcium: A multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT. Radiology 2007;243:527-38.PubMedCrossRef

Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A, et al. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: A multicenter study. Circulation 1996;93:898-904.PubMed

Thompson B, Stanford W. Update on using coronary calcium screening by computed tomography to measure risk for coronary heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005;21:39-53.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen S, Doherty T, Detrano R. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Med Assoc 2004;291:210-5.CrossRef

11.

Eggen DA, Strong JP, McGill HC. Coronary calcification: Relationship to clinically significant coronary lesions and race, sex, and topographic distribution. Circulation 1965;32:948-55.PubMed

12.

Wayhs R, Zelinger A, Raggi P. High coronary artery calcium scores pose an extremely elevated risk for hard events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:225-30.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Doherty TM, Detrano RC, Mautner SL, Matuner GC, Shavelle RM. Coronary calcium: The good, the bad, and the uncertain. Am Heart J 1999;137:806-14.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Jain T, Peshock R, McGuire DK, et al. African Americans and Caucasians have a similar prevalence of coronary calcium in the Dallas Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1011-7.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Okwuosa T, Greenland P, Ning H, Liu K, Bild D, Burke G, et al. Distribution of coronary artery calcium scores by Framingham 10-year risk strata in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1838-45.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Bild DE, Detrano R, Peterson D, Guerci A, Liu K, Shahar E, et al. Ethnic differences in coronary calcification: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation 2005;111:1313-20.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Oei HH, Vliegenthart R, Hofman A, Oudkerk M, Witteman JC. Risk factors for coronary calcification in older subjects. The Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. Eur Heart J 2004;25:5-48.

18.

New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG). Assessment and management of cardiovascular risk, 6 July 2003. http://www.nzgg.org.nz/guidelines/dsp_guideline_popup.cfm?guidelineID=35&guideline_popup_mode=newsDisplay&NewsID=21. Accessed 22 Mar 2010.

19.

Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, Gerber TC, Gersh B, Hillis LD, et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: Magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 2008;118:586-606.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Naghavi M, Falk E, Hecht HS, Jamieson MJ, Kaul S, Berman D, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient—Part III: Executive summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force report. Am J Cardiology 2006;98:2H-15H.CrossRef

21.

LaMonte MJ, FitzGerald SJ, Church TS, Barlow CE, Radford NB, Levine BD, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and coronary heart disease events in a large cohort of asymptomatic men and women. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:421-9.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, Walker S, Fraser C, Jia X, et al. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2008;94:1386-93.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. Circulation 2003;108:1772-8.PubMedCrossRef

24.

McEvoy JW, Blaha MJ, Defilippis AP, Budoff MJ, Nasir K, Blumenthal RS, et al. Coronary artery calcium progression: an important clinical measurement? A review of published reports. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1613-22.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, Bild DE, Burke G, Folsom AR, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1336-45.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Folsom AR, Kronmal RA, Detrano RC, O’Leary DH, Bild DE, Bluemke DA, et al. Coronary artery calcification compared with carotid intima-media thickness in the prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1333-9.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Coronary artery calcium as a measure of biologic age. Atherosclerosis 2006;188:112-9.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:378-402.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Carr JJ, Gerber TC, Hecht HS, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/ NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2663-99.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Okin PM, Weinsaft JW, Russo DJ, et al. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1161-70.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Boersma E, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, et al. Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:62-70.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Schepis T, Husmann L, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, et al. Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1162-73.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Hadamitzky M, Freissmuth B, Meyer T, Hein F, Kastrati A, Martinoff S, et al. Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:404-11.

34.

Carrigan TP, Nair D, Schoenhagen P, Curtin RJ, Popovic ZB, Halliburton S, et al. Prognostic utility of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2009;30:362-71.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K, Hara T, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:49-57.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Chow BJ, Wells GA, Chen L, Yam Y, Galiwango P, Abraham A, et al. Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1017-28.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kristensen TS, Kofoed KF, Kühl JT, Nielsen WB, Nielsen MB, Kelbæk H. Prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary plaques in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A multidetector computed tomography study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:502-9.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Kwon SW, Kim YJ, Shim J, Sung JM, Han ME, Kang DW, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring does not add prognostic value to standard 64-section CT angiography protocol in low-risk patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Radiology 2011;259:92-9.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Achenbach S, Berman D, Budoff M, Callister T, Chang H, Victor C, et al. Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography for the prediction of mortality and non-fatal major adverse cardiac events: Results from the multinational CONFIRM registry [abstract]. Circulation 2011;124:A14099.

40.

Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1237-47.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary computed tomographic angiography for systematic triage of acute chest pain patients to treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1414-22.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O’Gara P, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010;4:407-33.PubMed

43.

Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 2003;229:23.CrossRef

44.

Chow BJ, Ahmed O, Small G, Alghamdi AA, Yam Y, Chen L, et al. Prognostic value of CT angiography in coronary bypass patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:496-502.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Decramer I, Sarno G, Vanhoenacker PK, et al. Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: Non-invasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2373-81.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, Sugiura A, Harigaya H, Sato T, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:319-26.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Pflederer T, Marwan M, Schepis T, Ropers D, Seltmann M, Muschiol G, et al. Characterization of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes using coronary dual-source CT angiography. Atherosclerosis 2010;211:437-44.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Morita H, Fujimoto S, Kondo T, Arai T, Sekine T, Matsutani H, et al. Prevalence of computed tomographic angiography-verified high-risk plaques and significant luminal stenosis in patients with zero coronary calcium score. Int J Cardiol 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.02.052.

49.

Yoon YE, Chang SA, Choi SI, Chun EJ, Cho YS, Youn TJ, et al. The absence of coronary artery calcification does not rule out the presence of significant coronary artery disease in Asian patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:389-98.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Ergün E, Koşar P, Oztürk C, Başbay E, Koç F, Koşar U. Prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice CTA in patients with zero coronary calcium score. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27:451-8.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Cademartiri F, Maffei E, Palumbo A, Seitun S, Martini C, Tedeschi C, et al. Coronary calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in high-risk asymptomatic subjects: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy and prevalence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2010;20:846-54.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Gutstein A, Dey D, Cheng V, Wolak A, Gransar H, Suzuki Y, et al. Algorithm for radiation dose reduction with helical dual source coronary computed tomography angiography in clinical practice. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008;2:311-22.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Dey D, Schepis T, Marwan M, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Achenbach S. Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: Comparison with intravascular US. Radiology 2010;257:516-22.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, Benjamin EJ, Budoff MJ, Fayad ZA, et al 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:e50-103.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Prognostic value of cardiovascular CT: Is coronary artery calcium screening enough? The added value of CCTA
Authors: Erick Alexanderson, MD
Nadia Canseco-León, MD
Fernando Iñarra, MD
Aloha Meave, MD
Damini Dey, PhD
Publication date: 01-06-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9549-2

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Prognostic value of cardiovascular CT: Is coronary artery calcium screening enough? The added value of CCTA

Abstract

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Continuing education instructions: Advances in SPECT camera software and hardware: Currently available and new on the horizon

Non-FDG imaging of atherosclerosis: Will imaging of MMPs assess plaque vulnerability?

Reproducibility and accuracy of non-invasive measurement of infarct size in mice with high-resolution PET/CT

Myocardial perfusion SPECT “screening” at the start of dialysis

Lessons for Nuclear Cardiology from the DCRI/ACCF/AHA radiation think tank

Cardiac dyssynchrony: We have the tools. It is time to use them

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page