Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 3/2010

01-06-2010 | Original Article

Enhanced definition PET for cardiac imaging

Authors: Ludovic Le Meunier, PhD, Piotr J. Slomka, PhD, Damini Dey, PhD, Amit Ramesh, MSc, Louis E. J. Thomson, MBChB, FRACP, Sean W. Hayes, MD, John D. Friedman, MD, Victor Cheng, MD, Guido Germano, PhD, Daniel S. Berman, MD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We aimed to determine in phantom and cardiac clinical studies the impact of a new high-resolution PET image reconstruction.

Methods

A phantom with cardiac insert filled with 18F, 14 18F-FDG viability studies and 15 82Rb perfusion studies were acquired on a Siemens Biograph-64 (4-ring). The data were reconstructed with 2D- and 3D-attenuation weighted ordered subsets expectation maximization (AWOSEM), and high-definition reconstruction (HD·PET). We calculated wall/cavity contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), wall thickness, motion/thickening and ejection fraction.

Results

In the phantom study, we found an increase in defect size (up to 26%), contrast (up to 48%) and CNR (1.9) with HD·PET as compared to standard techniques. The contrast increased on HD·PET images compared to 2D- and 3D-AWOSEM for viability (14.0% ± 4.8%) and perfusion studies (7.3% ± 4.3%) (P < .05). Average CNR increased with HD·PET by 79.4% ± 17.1% and 68.8% ± 3.0% in viability and perfusion studies respectively (all P < .05). Average wall thickness with HD·PET decreased in the phantom study by 1.3 ± 0.3 mm and the viability studies by 1.9 ± 0.7 mm but not in the perfusion studies. The functional measurements were not significantly different for any techniques.

Conclusions

We demonstrated both in phantom and patient cardiac studies that HD·PET improves image contrast, defect definition, and CNR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Manjeshwar R, Ross S, Iatrou M, Deller T, Stearns C, Res G, et al. Fully 3D PET iterative reconstruction using distance-driven projectors and native scanner geometry. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2006;5:2804-7.CrossRef Manjeshwar R, Ross S, Iatrou M, Deller T, Stearns C, Res G, et al. Fully 3D PET iterative reconstruction using distance-driven projectors and native scanner geometry. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2006;5:2804-7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chang G, Pan T, Qiao F, Clark J Jr, Mawlawi O. Comparison between two super-resolution implementations in PET imaging. Med Phys 2009;36:1370.CrossRefPubMed Chang G, Pan T, Qiao F, Clark J Jr, Mawlawi O. Comparison between two super-resolution implementations in PET imaging. Med Phys 2009;36:1370.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kennedy J, Israel O, Frenkel A, Bar-Shalom R, Azhari H. Super-resolution in PET imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:137-47.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy J, Israel O, Frenkel A, Bar-Shalom R, Azhari H. Super-resolution in PET imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:137-47.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference De Bernardi E, Mazzoli M, Zito F, Baselli G. Resolution recovery in PET during AWOSEM reconstruction: A performance evaluation study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2007;54:1626-38.CrossRef De Bernardi E, Mazzoli M, Zito F, Baselli G. Resolution recovery in PET during AWOSEM reconstruction: A performance evaluation study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2007;54:1626-38.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Panin VY, Kehren F, Michel C, Casey M. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:907-21.CrossRefPubMed Panin VY, Kehren F, Michel C, Casey M. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:907-21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kudo T. Metabolic imaging using PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:49-61.CrossRef Kudo T. Metabolic imaging using PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:49-61.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Di Carli M, Dorbala S, Meserve J, El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Moore S. Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2007;48:783.CrossRefPubMed Di Carli M, Dorbala S, Meserve J, El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Moore S. Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2007;48:783.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jonsson C, Odh R, Schnell PO, Larsson SA. A comparison of the imaging properties of a 3-and 4-ring biograph PET scanner using a novel extended NEMA phantom. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2007;4:2865-7. Jonsson C, Odh R, Schnell PO, Larsson SA. A comparison of the imaging properties of a 3-and 4-ring biograph PET scanner using a novel extended NEMA phantom. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2007;4:2865-7.
9.
go back to reference Townsend D, Jakoby B, Long M, Carr C, Hubner K, Guglielmo C, et al. Performance and clinical workflow of a new combined PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med 2007;48:437P. Townsend D, Jakoby B, Long M, Carr C, Hubner K, Guglielmo C, et al. Performance and clinical workflow of a new combined PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med 2007;48:437P.
10.
go back to reference Watson C, Hayden C, Casey M, Hamill J, Bendriem B. Prompt gamma correction for improved quantification in 82Rb PET. J Nucl Med 2008;49:64P.CrossRef Watson C, Hayden C, Casey M, Hamill J, Bendriem B. Prompt gamma correction for improved quantification in 82Rb PET. J Nucl Med 2008;49:64P.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:601-9.CrossRefPubMed Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:601-9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Slomka P, Dorbala S, Berman D, Gerlach J, Germano G, DiCarli M. Automated quantification and normal limits for myocardial perfusion stress/rest Rb-82 PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2009;50:216P.CrossRef Slomka P, Dorbala S, Berman D, Gerlach J, Germano G, DiCarli M. Automated quantification and normal limits for myocardial perfusion stress/rest Rb-82 PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2009;50:216P.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cerqueira M, Weissman N, Dilsizian V, Jacobs A, Kaul S, Laskey W, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association 2002. p. 539-42. Cerqueira M, Weissman N, Dilsizian V, Jacobs A, Kaul S, Laskey W, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association 2002. p. 539-42.
14.
go back to reference Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Kang X, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, et al. Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: A new measure of ischemia. J Nucl Med 2004;45:183-91.PubMed Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Kang X, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, et al. Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: A new measure of ischemia. J Nucl Med 2004;45:183-91.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Slomka P, Germano G, Kavanagh P, Javadi M, Berman D, Bengel F. Evaluation of a new automatic algorithm for quantification of ECG-gated 82Rb cardiac PET. J Nucl Med 2009;50:217P.CrossRef Slomka P, Germano G, Kavanagh P, Javadi M, Berman D, Bengel F. Evaluation of a new automatic algorithm for quantification of ECG-gated 82Rb cardiac PET. J Nucl Med 2009;50:217P.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kadrmas D, Casey M, Conti M, Jakoby B, Lois C, Townsend D. Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1315.CrossRefPubMed Kadrmas D, Casey M, Conti M, Jakoby B, Lois C, Townsend D. Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1315.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Conti M, Bendriem B, Casey M, Eriksson L, Jakoby B, Jones WF, et al. Performance of a high sensitivity PET scanner based on LSO panel detectors. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006;53. Conti M, Bendriem B, Casey M, Eriksson L, Jakoby B, Jones WF, et al. Performance of a high sensitivity PET scanner based on LSO panel detectors. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006;53.
18.
go back to reference Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effect of object size. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1979;3:299.PubMedCrossRef Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effect of object size. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1979;3:299.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sanchez-Crespo A, Andreo P, Larsson S. Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:44-51.CrossRefPubMed Sanchez-Crespo A, Andreo P, Larsson S. Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:44-51.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Maddahi J, Schiepers C, Czernin J, Huang H, Schelbert H, Wijatyk A, et al. First human study of BMS747158, a novel F-18 labeled tracer for myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 2008;49:70P. Maddahi J, Schiepers C, Czernin J, Huang H, Schelbert H, Wijatyk A, et al. First human study of BMS747158, a novel F-18 labeled tracer for myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 2008;49:70P.
21.
go back to reference Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Kang X, Akincioglu C, Friedman JD, et al. “Motion-Frozen” display and quantification of myocardial perfusion. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1128-34.PubMed Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Kang X, Akincioglu C, Friedman JD, et al. “Motion-Frozen” display and quantification of myocardial perfusion. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1128-34.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Enhanced definition PET for cardiac imaging
Authors
Ludovic Le Meunier, PhD
Piotr J. Slomka, PhD
Damini Dey, PhD
Amit Ramesh, MSc
Louis E. J. Thomson, MBChB, FRACP
Sean W. Hayes, MD
John D. Friedman, MD
Victor Cheng, MD
Guido Germano, PhD
Daniel S. Berman, MD
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9193-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 3/2010 Go to the issue