Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 4/2012

01-12-2012 | Customization in Arthroplasty (BS Parsley, Section Editor)

Evolution of customization design for total knee arthroplasty

Authors: John Slamin, Brian Parsley

Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful surgical procedure with more than 600,000 TKA’s performed annually in the US. Interest in improving surgical outcomes has led to improvements in surgical technique, instrumentation, and implant design. Computer navigation and robotic systems were introduced to further refine the mechanical alignment of joint replacement procedures. The cost to implement some of these technologies and the additional time required in the operating room to utilize these developments has limited the acceptance of them broadly. The introduction of custom instrumentation and cutting blocks based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has allowed for better restoration of mechanical alignment. Unfortunately, little has changed in patient satisfaction in the past ten years. The recent introduction of patient specific instrumentation and patient specific implants is another step forward to restore the pre-deformity anatomy and joint geometry. This new technology can benefit the hospital by improving operating room time efficiencies through having shorter set-up times, and the elimination of cleaning, sterilization and inventory costs. The patient can potentially benefit by a shorter operative time, improved postoperative alignment and better fitting implants.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mahoney MM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1115–21.PubMedCrossRef Mahoney MM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1115–21.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty R, et al. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:31.PubMed Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty R, et al. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:31.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153.PubMed Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1097–106. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1097–106.
5.
go back to reference • Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63. This study demonstrates that despite all of the technological advances made in total knee replacement surgery in recent years that patient satisfaction for total knee patients is far below what total hip replacement surgery delivers.PubMedCrossRef • Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63. This study demonstrates that despite all of the technological advances made in total knee replacement surgery in recent years that patient satisfaction for total knee patients is far below what total hip replacement surgery delivers.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35–43.PubMedCrossRef Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35–43.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Laurencin CT, Zelicoff SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Clin Orthop. 1990;260:135. Laurencin CT, Zelicoff SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Clin Orthop. 1990;260:135.
8.
go back to reference Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM. In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:107–17.PubMedCrossRef Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, Gabriel SM. In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:107–17.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CW, et al. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation: a multi-center analysis. Clin Orthop. 1998;356:47–57.PubMedCrossRef Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CW, et al. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation: a multi-center analysis. Clin Orthop. 1998;356:47–57.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, et al. Multi-center determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2003;416:37–57.PubMedCrossRef Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, et al. Multi-center determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2003;416:37–57.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, et al. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:28–38.PubMedCrossRef Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, et al. Computer assisted orthopedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:28–38.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics. 2008;31:857–63. Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics. 2008;31:857–63.
13.
go back to reference Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:184–92. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:184–92.
14.
go back to reference Sisto DJ, Sarin VK. Custon patellofemoral arthroplasty of the knee. JBJS. 2006;88:1475–80.CrossRef Sisto DJ, Sarin VK. Custon patellofemoral arthroplasty of the knee. JBJS. 2006;88:1475–80.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lombardi AV. Patient specific knee design: an evolution of computer navigation; current concepts in joint replacement, published abstract, Winter 2007 meeting. Lombardi AV. Patient specific knee design: an evolution of computer navigation; current concepts in joint replacement, published abstract, Winter 2007 meeting.
16.
go back to reference Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Adams JB. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty; Orthopedics 2008;31:927–30. Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Adams JB. Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty; Orthopedics 2008;31:927–30.
17.
go back to reference Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MA, Hozack WJ. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:26–9. Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MA, Hozack WJ. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:26–9.
18.
go back to reference Noble JW, Moore CA, Lui N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:153–5. Noble JW, Moore CA, Lui N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:153–5.
19.
go back to reference Fitz W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with use of novel patient-specific resurfacing implants and personalized jigs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:69–76.PubMedCrossRef Fitz W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with use of novel patient-specific resurfacing implants and personalized jigs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:69–76.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evolution of customization design for total knee arthroplasty
Authors
John Slamin
Brian Parsley
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Issue 4/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9141-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 4/2012 Go to the issue

Customization in Arthroplasty (BS Parsley, Section Editor)

Design rationale for customized TKA: a new idea or revisiting the past?

Customization in Arthroplasty (BS Parsley, Section Editor)

Customization of cutting blocks: Can this address the problem?

Health Policy (AD Sharan, Section Editor)

Brief history of quality movement in US healthcare

Customization in Arthroplasty (BS Parsley, Section Editor)

The use of customized TKA implants for increased efficiency in the OR