Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Clinical Research

Collateral Ligament Laxity in Knees: What Is Normal?

Author: Kamal Deep, MBBS, MS, DNB, FRCS, MCh Orth, FRCS(Orth)

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Proper alignment and balancing of soft tissues of the knee are important goals for TKA. Despite standardized techniques, there is no consensus regarding the optimum amount of collateral ligament laxity one should leave at the end of the TKA.

Questions/purposes

I asked (1) what is the collateral laxity in young healthy volunteers, and (2) is there a difference in collateral laxity between males and females.

Methods

The femorotibial mechanical angle (FTMA) was measured in 314 knees in healthy volunteers aged 19 to 35 years. Subjects with a history of pain, malalignment, dysplasia, or trauma were excluded. Twenty-five knees were excluded because the hip center could not be acquired, and 22 were excluded because of a history of pain and trauma, leaving 267 knees for inclusion in the study. Of these, 155 were from men and 112 were from women. A validated method using a computer navigation system was used to obtain the measurements. A 10-Nm torque was used to stress the knee in varus and valgus at 0° extension and 15° flexion. An independent t-test and ANOVA were applied to the data to calculate any significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).

Results

The mean (SD) unstressed supine FTMA was varus of 1.2° (SD, 4°) in 0° extension and varus of 1.2° (SD, 4.4°) in 15° flexion (p = 0.88). On varus torque of 10 Nm, the supine FTMA changed by a mean of 3.1° (SD, 2°) (95% CI, 2.4°–3.8°; p < 0.001) in 0° extension and 6.9° (SD, 2.6°) (95% CI, 6.2°–7.7°; p < 0.001) in 15° flexion. On valgus torque of 10 Nm, the FTMA changed by a mean of 4.6° (SD, 2.2°) (95% CI, 3.9°–5.3°; p < 0.001) in 0° extension and 7.9° (SD, 3.4°) (95% CI, 7.1°–8.7°; p < 0.001) in 15° flexion. The mean unstressed FTMA in 0° extension was varus of 1.7° (SD, 4°) in men and 0.4° (SD, 3.9°) in women (p = 0.01). Differences in collateral ligament laxity were seen between men and women (p < 0.001 for valgus torque and 0.035 for varus torque in 15° flexion). With valgus torque at 0° flexion, the supine FTMA change was valgus of 4.2° (SD, 2.0°) for men and 5.0° (SD, 2.4°) for women, while at 15° flexion the FTMA change was valgus 7.6° (SD, 3.6°) for men and 8.3° (SD, 3.2°) for women With varus torque at 0° flexion, additional varus was −3.0° (SD, 1.8°) for men and −3.3° (SD, 2.2°) for women, while at 15° flexion, varus was −7.0° SD, (2.5°) for men and −6.9° (SD, 2.8°) for women.

Conclusions

The collateral laxity in young healthy volunteers was quantified in this study. The collateral ligament laxity is variable in different persons. In addition, ligaments in women are more lax than in men in valgus stress.

Clinical Relevance

This study was conducted on young, healthy knees. Whether the findings are applicable to arthritic knees and replaced knees needs additional evaluation. However the findings provide a baseline from which to work in the evaluation of arthritic knees and in the case of TKA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bankes MJ, Back DL, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and the radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. Knee. 2003;10:55–60.PubMedCrossRef Bankes MJ, Back DL, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and the radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. Knee. 2003;10:55–60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:178–183.PubMed Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:178–183.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682–687.PubMedCrossRef Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682–687.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:45–53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:45–53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, Verhaar JA. The whole leg radiograph: standing versus supine for determining axial alignment. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:565–568.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, Verhaar JA. The whole leg radiograph: standing versus supine for determining axial alignment. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:565–568.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372–377.PubMedCrossRef Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372–377.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Clarke JV, Riches PE, Picard F, Deakin AH. Non-invasive computer-assisted measurement of knee alignment. Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17:29–39.PubMedCrossRef Clarke JV, Riches PE, Picard F, Deakin AH. Non-invasive computer-assisted measurement of knee alignment. Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17:29–39.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Clarke JV, Wilson WT, Wearing SC, Picard F, Riches PE, Deakin AH. Standardising the clinical assessment of coronal knee laxity. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012;226:699–708.PubMedCrossRef Clarke JV, Wilson WT, Wearing SC, Picard F, Riches PE, Deakin AH. Standardising the clinical assessment of coronal knee laxity. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012;226:699–708.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Creaby MW, Wrigley TV, Lim BW, Bowles KA, Metcalf BR, Hinman RS, Bennell KL. Varus-valgus laxity and passive stiffness in medial knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010; 62:1237–1243.PubMedCrossRef Creaby MW, Wrigley TV, Lim BW, Bowles KA, Metcalf BR, Hinman RS, Bennell KL. Varus-valgus laxity and passive stiffness in medial knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010; 62:1237–1243.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Flannery NM. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(suppl 2):71–80.PubMedCrossRef Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Flannery NM. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(suppl 2):71–80.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Harvey WF, Niu J, Zhang Y, McCree PI, Felson DT, Nevitt M, Xu L, Aliabadi P, Hunter DJ. Knee alignment differences between Chinese and Caucasian subjects without osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67:1524–1528.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Harvey WF, Niu J, Zhang Y, McCree PI, Felson DT, Nevitt M, Xu L, Aliabadi P, Hunter DJ. Knee alignment differences between Chinese and Caucasian subjects without osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67:1524–1528.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Heesterbeek PJ, Verdonschot N, Wymenga AB. In vivo knee laxity in flexion and extension: a radiographic study in 30 older healthy subjects. Knee. 2008;15:45–49.PubMedCrossRef Heesterbeek PJ, Verdonschot N, Wymenga AB. In vivo knee laxity in flexion and extension: a radiographic study in 30 older healthy subjects. Knee. 2008;15:45–49.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hovinga KR, Lerner AL. Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1191–1196.PubMedCrossRef Hovinga KR, Lerner AL. Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1191–1196.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Longitudinal shapes of the tibia and femur are unrelated and variable. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1142–1148.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Longitudinal shapes of the tibia and femur are unrelated and variable. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1142–1148.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Ishii Y, Matsuda Y, Ishii R, Sakata S, Omori G. Coronal laxity in extension in vivo after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8:538–542.PubMedCrossRef Ishii Y, Matsuda Y, Ishii R, Sakata S, Omori G. Coronal laxity in extension in vivo after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8:538–542.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Matsuda Y, Takeda M, Walker SA, Komistek RD. Effect of knee laxity on in vivo kinematics of meniscal-bearing knee prostheses. Knee. 2007;14:269–274.PubMedCrossRef Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Matsuda Y, Takeda M, Walker SA, Komistek RD. Effect of knee laxity on in vivo kinematics of meniscal-bearing knee prostheses. Knee. 2007;14:269–274.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis: implantation with a non-image-based navigation system. In: DiGioia A, Jaramaz B, Picard F, Nolte LP, eds. Computer and Robotic Assisted Knee and Hip Surgery. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc; 2004:181–188. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis: implantation with a non-image-based navigation system. In: DiGioia A, Jaramaz B, Picard F, Nolte LP, eds. Computer and Robotic Assisted Knee and Hip Surgery. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc; 2004:181–188.
19.
go back to reference Markolf KL, Graff-Radford A, Amstutz HC. In vivo stability: a quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:664–674.PubMed Markolf KL, Graff-Radford A, Amstutz HC. In vivo stability: a quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:664–674.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Matsuda Y, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Ishii R. Effect of flexion angle on coronal laxity in patients with mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty prostheses. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:37–41.PubMedCrossRef Matsuda Y, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Ishii R. Effect of flexion angle on coronal laxity in patients with mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty prostheses. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:37–41.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nguyen AD, Shultz SJ. Sex differences in clinical measures of lower extremity alignment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 37:389–398.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen AD, Shultz SJ. Sex differences in clinical measures of lower extremity alignment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 37:389–398.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143–2149.PubMedCrossRef Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143–2149.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153–156.PubMed Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153–156.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Russell DF, Deakin AH, Fogg QA, Picard F. Non-invasive, non-radiological quantification of anteroposterior knee joint ligamentous laxity: a study in cadavers. Bone Joint Res. 2013;2:233–237.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Russell DF, Deakin AH, Fogg QA, Picard F. Non-invasive, non-radiological quantification of anteroposterior knee joint ligamentous laxity: a study in cadavers. Bone Joint Res. 2013;2:233–237.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:18–28.PubMed Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:18–28.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper: Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.PubMedCrossRef Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper: Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7–13.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Shultz SJ, Sander TC, Kirk SC, Perrin DH. Sex differences in knee joint laxity change across the female menstrual cycle. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005;45: 594–603.PubMedPubMedCentral Shultz SJ, Sander TC, Kirk SC, Perrin DH. Sex differences in knee joint laxity change across the female menstrual cycle. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005;45: 594–603.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Beynnon BD. Variation in varus/valgus and internal/external rotational knee laxity and stiffness across the menstrual cycle. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:318–325.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Beynnon BD. Variation in varus/valgus and internal/external rotational knee laxity and stiffness across the menstrual cycle. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:318–325.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Stulberg DS, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(suppl 2):90–98.PubMed Stulberg DS, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(suppl 2):90–98.PubMed
30.
go back to reference van der Esch M, Steultjens MPM, Lems WF, Dekker J. Gender difference in varus–valgus laxity in osteoarthritis of the knee. Scand J Rheumatol. 2007;36:157–159.PubMedCrossRef van der Esch M, Steultjens MPM, Lems WF, Dekker J. Gender difference in varus–valgus laxity in osteoarthritis of the knee. Scand J Rheumatol. 2007;36:157–159.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Willcox NM, Clarke JV, Smith BR, Deakin AH, Deep K. A comparison of radiological and computer navigation measurements of lower limb coronal alignment before and after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94;1234–1240.PubMedCrossRef Willcox NM, Clarke JV, Smith BR, Deakin AH, Deep K. A comparison of radiological and computer navigation measurements of lower limb coronal alignment before and after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94;1234–1240.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Sung KS, Wang JH, Lee SH, Bae SW, Ahn YJ. Measurement and comparison of the difference in normal medial and lateral knee joint opening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006:14:1238–1244.PubMedCrossRef Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Sung KS, Wang JH, Lee SH, Bae SW, Ahn YJ. Measurement and comparison of the difference in normal medial and lateral knee joint opening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006:14:1238–1244.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Collateral Ligament Laxity in Knees: What Is Normal?
Author
Kamal Deep, MBBS, MS, DNB, FRCS, MCh Orth, FRCS(Orth)
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3865-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2014 Go to the issue