Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Symposium: 2014 Knee Society Proceedings

High Degree of Accuracy of a Novel Image-free Handheld Robot for Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in a Cadaveric Study

Authors: Jess H. Lonner, MD, Julie R. Smith, PhD, Frederic Picard, MD, Brian Hamlin, MD, Philip J. Rowe, PhD, Philip E. Riches, PhD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgical robotics has been shown to improve the accuracy of bone preparation and soft tissue balance in unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, although extensive data have emerged with regard to a CT scan-based haptically constrained robotic arm, little is known about the accuracy of a newer alternative, an imageless robotic system.

Questions/purposes

We assessed the accuracy of a novel imageless semiautonomous freehand robotic sculpting system in performing bone resection and preparation in UKA using cadaveric specimens.

Methods

In this controlled study, we compared the planned and final implant placement in 25 cadaveric specimens undergoing UKA using the new tool. A quantitative analysis was performed to determine the translational, angular, and rotational differences between the planned and achieved positions of the implants.

Results

The femoral implant rotational mean error was 1.04° to 1.88° and mean translational error was 0.72 to 1.29 mm across the three planes. The tibial implant rotational mean error was 1.48° to 1.98° and the mean translational error was 0.79 to 1.27 mm across the three planes.

Conclusions

The image-free robotic sculpting tool achieved accurate implementation of the surgical plan with small errors in implant placement. The next step will be to determine whether accurate implant placement translates into a clinical and functional benefit for the patient.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:2235–2239.PubMed Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:2235–2239.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Berger RA, Meneghine RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:999–1006.PubMedCrossRef Berger RA, Meneghine RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:999–1006.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:782–788.PubMedCrossRef Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:782–788.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, Harris S, Jakopec M, Rodriguez F, Barrett A, Davies B. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the Acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:188–197.PubMedCrossRef Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, Harris S, Jakopec M, Rodriguez F, Barrett A, Davies B. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the Acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:188–197.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F, McAuley JP, Engh GA. Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(Suppl):108–115.PubMedCrossRef Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F, McAuley JP, Engh GA. Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(Suppl):108–115.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dunbar NJ, Roche MW, Park BH, Branch SH, Conditt MA, Banks SA. Accuracy of dynamic tactile-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:803–808.e1. Dunbar NJ, Roche MW, Park BH, Branch SH, Conditt MA, Banks SA. Accuracy of dynamic tactile-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:803–808.e1.
8.
go back to reference Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Hoeffel DP, Bert JM, Comfort T, Scheltema K, Mehle S, Grimm K. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:111–119.PubMedCrossRef Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Hoeffel DP, Bert JM, Comfort T, Scheltema K, Mehle S, Grimm K. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:111–119.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gioe TJ, Novak C, Sinner P, Ma W, Mehle S. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:83–87.PubMed Gioe TJ, Novak C, Sinner P, Ma W, Mehle S. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:83–87.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hamilton WG, Collier MB, Tarabee E, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Engh GA. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(Suppl):98–107.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton WG, Collier MB, Tarabee E, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Engh GA. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(Suppl):98–107.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:154–159.PubMed Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:154–159.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hernigou P. Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:161–165.PubMedCrossRef Hernigou P. Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:161–165.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosoc. 2003;11:40–45. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosoc. 2003;11:40–45.
14.
go back to reference Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:151–156.PubMed Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:151–156.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:469–474.PubMedCrossRef Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:469–474.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Cheney NA. Is recovery faster for mobile bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1450–1457.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Cheney NA. Is recovery faster for mobile bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1450–1457.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lonner JH, John TK, Conditt MA. Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:141–146.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lonner JH, John TK, Conditt MA. Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:141–146.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lustig S, Paillot JL, Servien E, Henry J, Ait Si Selmi T, Neyret P. Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:12–21. Lustig S, Paillot JL, Servien E, Henry J, Ait Si Selmi T, Neyret P. Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:12–21.
19.
go back to reference Marmor L. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum of 10 year follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;228:171–177.PubMed Marmor L. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum of 10 year follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;228:171–177.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:983–989.PubMedCrossRef Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:983–989.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Noticewala MS, Geller JA, Lee JH, Macaulay W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function more than total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(Suppl):99–105.PubMedCrossRef Noticewala MS, Geller JA, Lee JH, Macaulay W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function more than total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(Suppl):99–105.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:408–412.PubMedCrossRef Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:408–412.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ridgeway SR, McAuley PJ, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:351–355.PubMedCrossRef Ridgeway SR, McAuley PJ, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:351–355.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Smith JR, Picard F, Rowe PJ, Deakin A, Riches PE. The accuracy of a robotically-controlled freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2013;95(Suppl):68. Smith JR, Picard F, Rowe PJ, Deakin A, Riches PE. The accuracy of a robotically-controlled freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2013;95(Suppl):68.
29.
go back to reference Smith JR, Riches PE, Rowe PJ. Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement. Int J Med Robot. 2013 Aug 11 [Epub ahead of print]. Smith JR, Riches PE, Rowe PJ. Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement. Int J Med Robot. 2013 Aug 11 [Epub ahead of print].
30.
go back to reference SooHoo NF, Sharifi H, Kominski G, Lieberman JR. Cost effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1975–1982.PubMedCrossRef SooHoo NF, Sharifi H, Kominski G, Lieberman JR. Cost effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1975–1982.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum 15 year follow up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:61–72.PubMedCrossRef Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum 15 year follow up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:61–72.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:245–256.PubMed Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:245–256.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Wiles AD, Thompson DG, Frantz DD. Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems. Medical Imaging. 2004;5367:421–432. Wiles AD, Thompson DG, Frantz DD. Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems. Medical Imaging. 2004;5367:421–432.
35.
go back to reference Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsopa H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee. 2009;16:473–478.PubMedCrossRef Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsopa H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee. 2009;16:473–478.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
High Degree of Accuracy of a Novel Image-free Handheld Robot for Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty in a Cadaveric Study
Authors
Jess H. Lonner, MD
Julie R. Smith, PhD
Frederic Picard, MD
Brian Hamlin, MD
Philip J. Rowe, PhD
Philip E. Riches, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3764-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2015 Go to the issue