Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2013

Open Access 01-03-2013 | Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2011 ISOLS Meeting in Beijing, China

Compress® Knee Arthroplasty Has 80% 10-year Survivorship and Novel Forms of Bone Failure

Authors: John H. Healey, MD, Carol D. Morris, MD, Edward A. Athanasian, MD, Patrick J. Boland, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Compliant, self-adjusting compression technology is a novel approach for durable prosthetic fixation of the knee. However, the long-term survival of these constructs is unknown.

Questions/purposes

We therefore determined the survival of the Compress® prosthesis (Biomet Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA) at 5 and 10 actuarial years and identified the failure modes for this form of prosthetic fixation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic records for all 82 patients who underwent Compress® knee arthroplasty from 1998 to 2008, as well as one patient who received the device elsewhere but was followed at our institution. Prosthesis survivorship and modes of failure were determined. Followup was for a minimum of 12 months or until implant removal (median, 43 months; range, 6–131 months); 28 patients were followed for more than 5 years.

Results

We found a survivorship of 85% at 5 years and 80% at 10 years. Eight patients required prosthetic revision after interface failure due to aseptic loosening alone (n = 3) or aseptic loosening with periprosthetic fracture (n = 5). Additionally, five periprosthetic bone failures occurred that did not require revision: three patients had periprosthetic bone failure without fixation compromise and two exhibited irregular prosthetic osteointegration patterns with concomitant fracture due to mechanical insufficiency.

Conclusions

Compress® prosthetic fixation after distal femoral tumor resection exhibits long-term survivorship. Implant failure was associated with patient nonadherence to the recommended weightbearing proscription or with bone necrosis and fracture. We conclude this is the most durable FDA-approved fixation method for distal femoral megaprostheses.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abrams GD, Gajendran VK, Mohler DG, Avedian RS. Surgical technique: methods for removing a Compress® Compliant Pre-Stress Implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:1204–1212.PubMedCrossRef Abrams GD, Gajendran VK, Mohler DG, Avedian RS. Surgical technique: methods for removing a Compress® Compliant Pre-Stress Implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:1204–1212.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Avedian RS, Goldsby RE, Kramer MJ, O’Donnell RJ. Effect of chemotherapy on initial compressive osseointegration of tumor endoprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:48–53.PubMedCrossRef Avedian RS, Goldsby RE, Kramer MJ, O’Donnell RJ. Effect of chemotherapy on initial compressive osseointegration of tumor endoprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:48–53.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bergin PF, Noveau JB, Jelinek JS, Henshaw RM. Aseptic loosening rates in distal femoral endoprostheses: does stem size matter? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:743–50.PubMedCrossRef Bergin PF, Noveau JB, Jelinek JS, Henshaw RM. Aseptic loosening rates in distal femoral endoprostheses: does stem size matter? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:743–50.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bhangu AA, Kramer MJ, Grimer RJ, O’Donnell RJ. Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress implant. Int Orthop. 2006;30:465–472.PubMedCrossRef Bhangu AA, Kramer MJ, Grimer RJ, O’Donnell RJ. Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress implant. Int Orthop. 2006;30:465–472.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Biau D, Faure F, Katsahian S, Jeanrot C, Tomeno B, Anract P. Survival of total knee replacement with a megaprosthesis after bone tumor resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1285–1293.PubMedCrossRef Biau D, Faure F, Katsahian S, Jeanrot C, Tomeno B, Anract P. Survival of total knee replacement with a megaprosthesis after bone tumor resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1285–1293.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bickels J, Wittig JC, Kollender Y, Henshaw RM, Kellar-Graney KL, Meller I, Malawer MM. Distal femur resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction: a long-term followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;400:225–235.PubMedCrossRef Bickels J, Wittig JC, Kollender Y, Henshaw RM, Kellar-Graney KL, Meller I, Malawer MM. Distal femur resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction: a long-term followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;400:225–235.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bini SA, Johnston JO, Martin DL. Compliant prestress fixation in tumor prostheses: interface retrieval data. Orthopedics. 2000;23:707–711; discussion 711–712PubMed Bini SA, Johnston JO, Martin DL. Compliant prestress fixation in tumor prostheses: interface retrieval data. Orthopedics. 2000;23:707–711; discussion 711–712PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bruns J, Delling G, Gruber H, Lohmann CH, Habermann CR. Cementless fixation of megaprostheses using a conical fluted stem in the treatment of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1084–1087.PubMedCrossRef Bruns J, Delling G, Gruber H, Lohmann CH, Habermann CR. Cementless fixation of megaprostheses using a conical fluted stem in the treatment of bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1084–1087.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Farfalli GL, Boland PJ, Morris CD, Athanasian EA, Healey JH. Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2792–2799.PubMedCrossRef Farfalli GL, Boland PJ, Morris CD, Athanasian EA, Healey JH. Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2792–2799.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Griffin AM, Parsons JA, Davis AM, Bell RS, Wunder JS. Uncemented tumor endoprostheses at the knee: root causes of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:71–79.PubMedCrossRef Griffin AM, Parsons JA, Davis AM, Bell RS, Wunder JS. Uncemented tumor endoprostheses at the knee: root causes of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:71–79.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Horowitz SM, Glasser DB, Lane JM, Healey JH. Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma: how long do the reconstructions last? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;293:280–286.PubMed Horowitz SM, Glasser DB, Lane JM, Healey JH. Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma: how long do the reconstructions last? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;293:280–286.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kawai A, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Athanasian EA, Jeon DG. A rotating-hinge knee replacement for malignant tumors of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:187–196.PubMedCrossRef Kawai A, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Athanasian EA, Jeon DG. A rotating-hinge knee replacement for malignant tumors of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:187–196.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kinkel S, Lehner B, Kleinhans JA, Jakubowitz E, Ewerbeck V, Heisel C. Medium to long-term results after reconstruction of bone defects at the knee with tumor endoprostheses. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:166–169.PubMed Kinkel S, Lehner B, Kleinhans JA, Jakubowitz E, Ewerbeck V, Heisel C. Medium to long-term results after reconstruction of bone defects at the knee with tumor endoprostheses. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:166–169.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kramer MJ, Tanner BJ, Horvai AE, O’Donnell RJ. Compressive osseointegration promotes viable bone at the endoprosthetic interface: retrieval study of Compress implants. Int Orthop. 2008;32:567–571.PubMedCrossRef Kramer MJ, Tanner BJ, Horvai AE, O’Donnell RJ. Compressive osseointegration promotes viable bone at the endoprosthetic interface: retrieval study of Compress implants. Int Orthop. 2008;32:567–571.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Langlais F, Belot N, Ropars M, Lambotte JC, Thomazeau H. The long-term results of press-fit cemented stems in total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1022–1026.PubMed Langlais F, Belot N, Ropars M, Lambotte JC, Thomazeau H. The long-term results of press-fit cemented stems in total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1022–1026.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Mascard E, Anract P, Touchene A, Pouillart P, Tomeno B. [Complications from the hinged GUEPAR prosthesis after resection of knee tumor: 102 cases] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998;84:628–637.PubMed Mascard E, Anract P, Touchene A, Pouillart P, Tomeno B. [Complications from the hinged GUEPAR prosthesis after resection of knee tumor: 102 cases] [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998;84:628–637.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Matsumine A, Ueda T, Sugita T, Yazawa Y, Isu K, Kawai A, Abe S, Yakushiji T, Hiraga H, Sudo A, Uchida A; Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. Clinical outcomes of the KYOCERA Physio Hinge Total Knee System Type III after the resection of a bone and soft tissue tumor of the distal part of the femur. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103:257–263.PubMedCrossRef Matsumine A, Ueda T, Sugita T, Yazawa Y, Isu K, Kawai A, Abe S, Yakushiji T, Hiraga H, Sudo A, Uchida A; Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. Clinical outcomes of the KYOCERA Physio Hinge Total Knee System Type III after the resection of a bone and soft tissue tumor of the distal part of the femur. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103:257–263.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mittermayer F, Krepler P, Dominkus M, Schwameis E, Sluga M, Heinzl H, Kotz R. Long-term followup of uncemented tumor endoprostheses for the lower extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:167–177.PubMedCrossRef Mittermayer F, Krepler P, Dominkus M, Schwameis E, Sluga M, Heinzl H, Kotz R. Long-term followup of uncemented tumor endoprostheses for the lower extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:167–177.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Morgan HD, Cizik AM, Leopold SS, Hawkins DS, Conrad EU 3rd. Survival of tumor megaprostheses replacements about the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:39–45.PubMedCrossRef Morgan HD, Cizik AM, Leopold SS, Hawkins DS, Conrad EU 3rd. Survival of tumor megaprostheses replacements about the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:39–45.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Myers GJ, Abudu AT, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Grimer RJ. Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur for bone tumours: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:521–526.PubMedCrossRef Myers GJ, Abudu AT, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Grimer RJ. Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur for bone tumours: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:521–526.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference O’Donnell RJ. Compressive osseointegration of modular endoprostheses. Curr Opin Orthop. 2007;18:590–603.CrossRef O’Donnell RJ. Compressive osseointegration of modular endoprostheses. Curr Opin Orthop. 2007;18:590–603.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference O’Donnell RJ. Compressive osseointegration of tibial implants in primary cancer reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2807–2812.PubMedCrossRef O’Donnell RJ. Compressive osseointegration of tibial implants in primary cancer reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2807–2812.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pedtke AC, Wustrack RL, Fang AS, Grimer RJ, O’Donnell RJ. Aseptic failure: how does the Compress® implant compare to cemented stems? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:735–742.PubMedCrossRef Pedtke AC, Wustrack RL, Fang AS, Grimer RJ, O’Donnell RJ. Aseptic failure: how does the Compress® implant compare to cemented stems? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:735–742.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Plötz W, Rechl H, Burgkart R, Messmer C, Schelter R, Hipp E, Gradinger R. Limb salvage with tumor endoprostheses for malignant tumors of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:207–215.PubMedCrossRef Plötz W, Rechl H, Burgkart R, Messmer C, Schelter R, Hipp E, Gradinger R. Limb salvage with tumor endoprostheses for malignant tumors of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:207–215.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ritschl P, Capanna R, Helwig U, Campanacci M, Kotz R. [KMFTR (Kotz Modular Femur Tibia Reconstruction System) modular tumor endoprosthesis system for the lower extremity] [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1992;130:290–293.PubMedCrossRef Ritschl P, Capanna R, Helwig U, Campanacci M, Kotz R. [KMFTR (Kotz Modular Femur Tibia Reconstruction System) modular tumor endoprosthesis system for the lower extremity] [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1992;130:290–293.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Roberts P, Chan D, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS, Scales JT. Prosthetic replacement of the distal femur for primary bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:762–769.PubMed Roberts P, Chan D, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS, Scales JT. Prosthetic replacement of the distal femur for primary bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:762–769.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Shehadeh A, Noveau J, Malawer M, Henshaw R. Late complications and survival of endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2885–2895.PubMedCrossRef Shehadeh A, Noveau J, Malawer M, Henshaw R. Late complications and survival of endoprosthetic reconstruction after resection of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2885–2895.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tan PX, Yong BC, Wang J, Huang G, Yin JQ, Zou CY, Xie XB, Tang QL, Shen JN. Analysis of the efficacy and prognosis of limb-salvage surgery for osteosarcoma around the knee. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 July 16 [Epub ahead of print]. Tan PX, Yong BC, Wang J, Huang G, Yin JQ, Zou CY, Xie XB, Tang QL, Shen JN. Analysis of the efficacy and prognosis of limb-salvage surgery for osteosarcoma around the knee. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 July 16 [Epub ahead of print].
29.
go back to reference Tyler WK, Healey JH, Morris CD, Boland PJ, O’Donnell RJ. Compress® periprosthetic fractures: interface stability and ease of revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2800-2806.PubMedCrossRef Tyler WK, Healey JH, Morris CD, Boland PJ, O’Donnell RJ. Compress® periprosthetic fractures: interface stability and ease of revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2800-2806.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Unwin PS, Cannon SR, Grimer RJ, Kemp HB, Sneath RS, Walker PS. Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:5–13.PubMed Unwin PS, Cannon SR, Grimer RJ, Kemp HB, Sneath RS, Walker PS. Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:5–13.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Unwin PS, Cobb JP, Walker PS. Distal femoral arthroplasty using custom-made prostheses: the first 218 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:259–268.PubMedCrossRef Unwin PS, Cobb JP, Walker PS. Distal femoral arthroplasty using custom-made prostheses: the first 218 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:259–268.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Webber NP, Seidel M. Combining advanced technologies: the Compress-Repiphysis prosthesis for pediatric limb salvage. Orthopedics. 2010;33:823.PubMedCrossRef Webber NP, Seidel M. Combining advanced technologies: the Compress-Repiphysis prosthesis for pediatric limb salvage. Orthopedics. 2010;33:823.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zimel MN, Cizik AM, Rapp TB, Weisstein JS, Conrad EU 3rd. Megaprosthesis versus condyle-sparing intercalary allograft: distal femoral sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2813–2824.PubMedCrossRef Zimel MN, Cizik AM, Rapp TB, Weisstein JS, Conrad EU 3rd. Megaprosthesis versus condyle-sparing intercalary allograft: distal femoral sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2813–2824.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Compress® Knee Arthroplasty Has 80% 10-year Survivorship and Novel Forms of Bone Failure
Authors
John H. Healey, MD
Carol D. Morris, MD
Edward A. Athanasian, MD
Patrick J. Boland, MD
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2635-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2013 Go to the issue

Symposium: Highlights from the First Combined 2011 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and Connective Tissue Oncology Society

A Novel Imaging System Permits Real-time in Vivo Tumor Bed Assessment After Resection of Naturally Occurring Sarcomas in Dogs

Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2011 ISOLS Meeting in Beijing, China

Which Implant Is Best After Failed Treatment for Pathologic Femur Fractures?