Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 5/2008

01-10-2008 | Original Paper

Compressive osseointegration promotes viable bone at the endoprosthetic interface: retrieval study of Compress® implants

Authors: M. J. Kramer, B. J. Tanner, A. E. Horvai, R. J. O’Donnell

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The Compress® implant (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) is an innovative device developed to enable massive endoprosthetic fixation through the application of compressive forces at the bone-implant interface. This design provides immediate, stable anchorage and helps to avoid the long-term complication of aseptic loosening secondary to stress shielding and particle-induced osteolysis seen in conventional, stemmed megaprostheses. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the in vivo biological effects of the high compressive forces attained. Twelve consecutive Compress® patients undergoing revision surgery for infection, periprosthetic fracture, or local tumour recurrence were reviewed in order to exclude the possibility of osteonecrosis at the prosthetic interface. Compressive forces ranged from 400–800 lb. Duration of implantation averaged 3.3 years (range 0.4–12.2 years). Two patients with infection demonstrated loosening at the bone-prosthetic interface; otherwise, there was no radiographic evidence of prosthetic failure in any of the patients. No patient demonstrated histological evidence of osteonecrosis. In fact, new woven bone and other findings consistent with viable bone were noted in all of the retrieved specimens.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Avedian R, Goldsby RE, Kramer MJ, O’Donnell RJ (2007) Effect of chemotherapy on initial compressive osseointegration of oncologic endoprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res, Epub March 15 Avedian R, Goldsby RE, Kramer MJ, O’Donnell RJ (2007) Effect of chemotherapy on initial compressive osseointegration of oncologic endoprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res, Epub March 15
2.
go back to reference Bhangu AA, Kramer MJ, Grimer RJ, O’Donnell RJ (2006) Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress® implant. Int Orthop 30:465–472PubMedCrossRef Bhangu AA, Kramer MJ, Grimer RJ, O’Donnell RJ (2006) Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress® implant. Int Orthop 30:465–472PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bini SA, Johnston JO, Martin DL (2000) Compliant prestress fixation in tumor prostheses: interface retrieval data. Orthopedics 23(7):707–712PubMed Bini SA, Johnston JO, Martin DL (2000) Compliant prestress fixation in tumor prostheses: interface retrieval data. Orthopedics 23(7):707–712PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cristofolini L, Bini SA, Toni A (1998) In vitro testing of a novel limb salvage prosthesis for the distal femur. Clin Biomech 13:608–615CrossRef Cristofolini L, Bini SA, Toni A (1998) In vitro testing of a novel limb salvage prosthesis for the distal femur. Clin Biomech 13:608–615CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lanyon LE, Hampson WGJ, Goodship AE, Shah JS (1975) Bone deformation recorded in vivo from strain gauges attached to the human tibial shaft. Acta Orthop Scand 46:256–268PubMedCrossRef Lanyon LE, Hampson WGJ, Goodship AE, Shah JS (1975) Bone deformation recorded in vivo from strain gauges attached to the human tibial shaft. Acta Orthop Scand 46:256–268PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mullender MG, Huiskes R (1995) Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff’s law. J Orthop Res 13(4):503–512PubMedCrossRef Mullender MG, Huiskes R (1995) Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff’s law. J Orthop Res 13(4):503–512PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Muschler GF, Levine MJ, Ihara K, Otis JC, Lane JM, Burstein AH, Healey JH (1995) A custom distal femoral prosthesis for reconstruction of large defects following wide excision for sarcoma: results and prognostic factors. Orthopedics 18(6):527–538PubMed Muschler GF, Levine MJ, Ihara K, Otis JC, Lane JM, Burstein AH, Healey JH (1995) A custom distal femoral prosthesis for reconstruction of large defects following wide excision for sarcoma: results and prognostic factors. Orthopedics 18(6):527–538PubMed
8.
go back to reference Naudie DDR, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (2007) Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(1):53–64PubMed Naudie DDR, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (2007) Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(1):53–64PubMed
9.
go back to reference Reilly DT, Burstein AH (1974) The mechanical properties of cortical bone. J Bone Jt Surg 56-A(5):1001–1022 Reilly DT, Burstein AH (1974) The mechanical properties of cortical bone. J Bone Jt Surg 56-A(5):1001–1022
10.
go back to reference Ries MD (2003) Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management: wear. In: Ferlic DC (ed) Instructional course lectures, vol 52. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, pp 257–265 Ries MD (2003) Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management: wear. In: Ferlic DC (ed) Instructional course lectures, vol 52. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, pp 257–265
11.
go back to reference Uhthoff HK, Poitras P, Backman DS (2006) Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and recent developments. J Orthop Sci 11:118–126PubMedCrossRef Uhthoff HK, Poitras P, Backman DS (2006) Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and recent developments. J Orthop Sci 11:118–126PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ward WG Sr, Dorey F, Kelly C, Kabo JM, Wirganowicz PZ, Eckardt JJ (1999) Lessons from massive tumor endoprostheses: implications for future tumor and total joint endoprostheses. Semin Arthroplasty 10(3):124–132 Ward WG Sr, Dorey F, Kelly C, Kabo JM, Wirganowicz PZ, Eckardt JJ (1999) Lessons from massive tumor endoprostheses: implications for future tumor and total joint endoprostheses. Semin Arthroplasty 10(3):124–132
Metadata
Title
Compressive osseointegration promotes viable bone at the endoprosthetic interface: retrieval study of Compress® implants
Authors
M. J. Kramer
B. J. Tanner
A. E. Horvai
R. J. O’Donnell
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0392-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

International Orthopaedics 5/2008 Go to the issue