Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Diabetes Reports
Published in: Current Diabetes Reports 6/2010

01-12-2010

Patient Web Portals to Improve Diabetes Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Authors: Chandra Y. Osborn, Lindsay Satterwhite Mayberry, Shelagh A. Mulvaney, Rachel Hess

Published in: Current Diabetes Reports | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Patient web portals (PWPs), defined as the integration of electronic medical records and patient health records, have been related to enhanced patient outcomes. A literature review was conducted to characterize the design and evaluation of PWPs to improve health care processes and outcomes in diabetes. A summary of 26 articles revealed the positive impact PWPs have on patient outcomes, patient-provider communication, disease management, and access to and patient satisfaction with health care. Innovative and useful approaches included the evaluation of specific components of the PWPs, assessing the impact of PWPs on mediators of health behaviors, such as patient distress, identification of barriers to use, and patient willingness to pay for access. Future research should focus on relevant processes that mediate patient and provider use, impact on health care utilization, and a patient-centered approach to the design and integration of educational opportunities afforded through PWPs.
Literature
1.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al.: Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004, 27:1047–1053.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Yach D, Stuckler D, Brownell KD: Epidemiologic and economic consequences of the global epidemics of obesity and diabetes. Nat Med 2006, 12:62–66.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al.: Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000, 321:405–412.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus: American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 2002. Diabetes Care 2002, 25(Suppl 1):S1–S147.
5.
Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
6.
Krishna S, Boren SA: Diabetes self-management care via cell phone: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008, 2:509–517.PubMed
7.
Verhoeven F, Tanja-Dijkstra K, Nijland N, et al.: Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: a systematic literature review. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 4:666–684.
8.
Knecht LA, Gauthier SM, Castro JC, et al.: Diabetes care in the hospital: is there clinical inertia? J Hosp Med 2006, 1:151–160.CrossRefPubMed
9.
• Holbrook A, Thabane L, Keshavjee K, et al.: Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial. CMAJ 2009, 181:37–44. Unlike other studies that examine clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction only, the primary outcome for this study was a process composite score that represented the change in relevant clinical monitoring behaviors, by patients and providers, between the intervention and control groups over 6 months. This process score reflects quality of care, and improvement in quality of care over time. PubMed
10.
Kushniruk AW, Borycki EM, Armstrong B, et al.: Bringing electronic patient records into health professional education: towards an integrative framework. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009, 150:883–887.PubMed
11.
Crosson JC, Ohman-Strickland PA, Hahn KA, et al.: Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices. Ann Fam Med 2007, 5:209–215.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Varonen H, Kortteisto T, Kaila M: What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Fam Pract 2008, 25:162–167.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Dorr D, Bonner LM, Cohen AN, et al.: Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007, 14:156–163.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Burrington-Brown J, Fishel J, Fox L, et al.: Defining the personal health record. AHIMA releases definition, attributes of consumer health record. J AHIMA 2005, 76:24–25.PubMed
15.
Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al.: Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006, 13:121–126.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, Tang P: Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008, 8:45.CrossRefPubMed
17.
•• Fonda SJ, McMahon GT, Gomes HE, et al.: Changes in diabetes distress related to participation in an internet-based diabetes care management program and glycemic control. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009, 3:117–124. PWP usage, clinical outcomes, and diabetes distress levels were all assessed, allowing the authors to examine how diabetes distress impacts PWP usage and moderates clinical benefits from PWP usage. Findings show that individuals who have a high level of diabetes distress are less likely to consistently use PWPs. Recommendations include working aggressively with patients whose diabetes is poorly controlled before introducing a PWP to maintain health.PubMed
18.
Fonda SJ, Paulsen CA, Perkins J, et al.: Usability test of an internet-based informatics tool for diabetes care providers: the comprehensive diabetes management program. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008, 10:16–24.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Olshansky E, Sacco D, Fitzgerald K, et al.: Living with diabetes: normalizing the process of managing diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2008, 34:1004–1012.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Hess R, Bryce CL, Paone S, et al.: Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment. Telemed J E Health 2007, 13:509–517.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Bryce CL, Zickmund S, Hess R, et al.: Value versus user fees: perspectives of patients before and after using a web-based portal for management of diabetes. Telemed J E Health 2008, 14:1035–1043.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zickmund SL, Hess R, Bryce CL, et al.: Interest in the use of computerized patient portals: role of the provider-patient relationship. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23(Suppl 1):20–26.CrossRefPubMed
23.
•• Quinn CC, Gruber-Baldini AL, Shardell M, et al.: Mobile diabetes intervention study: testing a personalized treatment/behavioral communication intervention for blood glucose control. Contemp Clin Trials 2009, 30:334–346. Researchers randomly assigned 36 provider practices in geographically diverse areas to four conditions: treatment as usual, patient access to PWP only, patient and provider communication with PWP, and patient and provider access to PWP plus treatment algorithms. By using three different treatment groups, this study can compare specific aspects of PWPs to empirically assess what specific processes of PWPs have the most impact on clinical outcomes. Results from this study are forthcoming.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Ma C, Warren J, Phillips P, Stanek J: Empowering patients with essential information and communication support in the context of diabetes. Int J Med Inform 2006, 75:577–596.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Ross SE, Nowels CT, Haverhals LM, et al.: Qualitative assessment of Diabetes-STAR: a patient portal with disease management functions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:1097.
26.
Kobb R, Hoffman N, Lodge R, Kline S: Enhancing elder chronic care through technology and care coordination: report from a pilot. Telemed J E Health 2003, 9:189–195.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Tang CH, Li CC, Chang GH, Chang P: Implementing a personalized portal combined with workflow management tools used in diabetes care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:1026.
28.
Wald JS, Grant RW, Schnipper JL, et al.: Survey analysis of patient experience using a practice-linked PHR for type 2 diabetes mellitus. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2009, 2009:678–682.PubMed
29.
Kollmann A, Riedl M, Kastner P, et al.: Feasibility of a mobile phone-based data service for functional insulin treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. J Med Internet Res 2007, 9:e36.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Ross SE, Haverhals LM, Main DS, et al.: Adoption and use of an online patient portal for diabetes (Diabetes-STAR). AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:1080.
31.
Bellazzi R, Arcelloni M, Ferrari P, et al.: Management of patients with diabetes through information technology: tools for monitoring and control of the patients' metabolic behavior. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004, 6:567–578.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Kim HS, Kim NC, Ahn SH: Impact of a nurse short message service intervention for patients with diabetes. J Nurs Care Qual 2006, 21:266–271.PubMed
33.
McMahon GT, Gomes HE, Hickson Hohne S, et al.: Web-based care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005, 28:1624–1629.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Noel HC, Vogel DC, Erdos JJ, et al.: Home telehealth reduces healthcare costs. Telemed J E Health 2004, 10:170–183.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Quinn CC, Clough SS, Minor JM, et al.: WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008, 10:160–168.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Smith KE, Levine BA, Clement SC, et al.: Impact of MyCareTeam for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004, 6:828–835.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Kaufman DR, Pevzner J, Hilliman C, et al.: Redesigning a Telehealth Diabetes Management Program for a Digital Divide Seniors Population. Home Health Care Mgmt Prac 2006, 18:223–234.CrossRef
38.
Hsu J, Huange J, Kinsman J, et al.: Use of e-Health services between 1999 and 2002: a growing digital divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12:164–171.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Kim EH, Stolyar A, Lober WB, et al.: Challenges to using an electronic personal health record by low-income elderly population. J Med Internet Res 2009, 11:44.CrossRef
40.
Ralston JD, Rutter CM, Carrell D, et al.: Patient use of secure electronic messaging within a shared medical record: a cross-sectional study. J Gen Intern Med 2009, 24:349–355.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Nordqvist C, Hanberger L, Timpka T, Nordfeldt S: Health professionals' attitudes towards using a Web 2.0 portal for child and adolescent diabetes care: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2009, 11:e12.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Britto MT, Jimison HB, Munafo JK, et al.: Usability testing finds problems for novice users of pediatric portals. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16:660–669.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Ralston JD, Hereford J, Carrell D: Use and satisfaction of a patient Web portal with a shared medical record between patients and providers. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:1070.
44.
Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands DZ: Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006, 13:91–95.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Leveille SG, Huang A, Tsai SB, et al.: Screening for chronic conditions using a patient internet portal: recruitment for an internet-based primary care intervention. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23:472–475.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Koonce TY, Giuse DA, Beauregard JM, Giuse NB: Toward a more informed patient: bridging health care information through an interactive communication portal. J Med Libr Assoc 2007, 95:77–81.PubMed
47.
Lin CT, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, et al.: An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2005, 7:e47.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Businger A, Buckel L, Gandhi T, et al.: Patient review of selected electronic health record data improves visit experience. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:887.
49.
Kittler AF, Carlson GL, Harris C, et al.: Primary care physician attitudes towards using a secure web-based portal designed to facilitate electronic communication with patients. Inform Prim Care 2004, 12:129–138.PubMed
50.
Nordfeldt S, Hanberger L, Bertero C: Patient and parent views on a Web 2.0 Diabetes Portal—the management tool, the generator, and the gatekeeper: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res, 12:e17.
51.
Lobach DF, Willis JM, Macri JM, et al.: Perceptions of Medicaid beneficiaries regarding the usefulness of accessing personal health information and services through a patient Internet portal. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:509–513.
52.
DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al.: Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:50–60.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, et al.: Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:1628–1638.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Stead WW, Lin HS: Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions. Washington, DC: National Research Council; 2009.
55.
Faridi Z, Liberti L, Shuval K, et al.: Evaluating the impact of mobile telephone technology on type 2 diabetic patients' self-management: the NICHE pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract 2008, 14:465–469.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Beaudoin DE, Rocha RA, Tse T: Enhancing access to patient education information: a pilot usability study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:892.
Metadata
Title
Patient Web Portals to Improve Diabetes Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Authors
Chandra Y. Osborn
Lindsay Satterwhite Mayberry
Shelagh A. Mulvaney
Rachel Hess
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Electronic ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-010-0151-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Current Diabetes Reports 6/2010 Go to the issue

ReviewPaper

Physiologic Characterization of Type 2 Diabetes–Related Loci

Clinical Trial Report

Preconception Counseling for Adolescent Females with Type 1 Diabetes: The READY-Girls Program

ReviewPaper

Genetics of Diabetes Complications

ReviewPaper

From Genetic Association to Molecular Mechanism

ReviewPaper

Islet Versus Pancreas Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes: Competitive or Complementary?

ReviewPaper

Preventing Poor Psychological and Health Outcomes in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits