Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Cardiology Reports 9/2019

01-09-2019 | ß-Blockers | Invasive Electrophysiology and Pacing (EK Heist, Section Editor)

Electrical Storm: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives

Authors: Christos Kontogiannis, Konstantinos Tampakis, Georgios Georgiopoulos, Stefano Bartoletti, Christos Papageorgiou, Hector Anninos, Alkistis Kapelouzou, Michael Spartalis, Ioannis Paraskevaidis, Sofia Chatzidou

Published in: Current Cardiology Reports | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening medical emergency of repetitive episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias within a short period. Its occurrence is associated with poor short- and long-term survival, even in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Management of ES is challenging and mainly based on retrospective studies. This article reviews the existing literature on ES, presents the available data regarding its management, and proposes a new algorithm based on current evidence.

Recent Findings

Recent research could modify the management of ES supporting the role of non-selective β1 and β2 blockade and the early intervention with catheter ablation as well as strengthening the role of cardiac sympathetic denervation.

Summary

A multipronged approach should be considered for the management of ES including identification and correction of reversible causes, ICD reprogramming, drug therapy (beta-blockers—especially non-selective ones—and other anti-arrhythmic drugs) and non-pharmacologic therapies such as catheter ablation and techniques of neuroaxial modulation. Although current data suggest early aggressive management, further research is required to clarify the optimal order and combination of therapies for the prevention of future events.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(41):2793–867. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv316.CrossRefPubMed Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(41):2793–867. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehv316.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Katritsis DG, Boriani G, Cosio FG, Hindricks G, Jaïs P, Josephson ME, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and SociedadLatinoamericana de EstimulaciónCardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE). Europace. 2017;19(3):465–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw301.CrossRefPubMed Katritsis DG, Boriani G, Cosio FG, Hindricks G, Jaïs P, Josephson ME, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and SociedadLatinoamericana de EstimulaciónCardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE). Europace. 2017;19(3):465–511. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​europace/​euw301.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am CollCardiol. 2018;72(14):1677–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.053.CrossRef Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am CollCardiol. 2018;72(14):1677–749. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2017.​10.​053.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brewster J, Sexton T, Dhaliwal G, Charnigo R, Morales G, Parrott K, et al. Acute effects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks on biomarkers of myocardial injury, apoptosis, heart failure, and systemic inflammation. Pacing ClinElectrophysiol. 2017;40(4):344–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13037.CrossRef Brewster J, Sexton T, Dhaliwal G, Charnigo R, Morales G, Parrott K, et al. Acute effects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks on biomarkers of myocardial injury, apoptosis, heart failure, and systemic inflammation. Pacing ClinElectrophysiol. 2017;40(4):344–52. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​pace.​13037.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gasparini M, Proclemer A, Klersy C, Kloppe A, Lunati M, Ferrer JB, et al. Effect of long-detection interval vs standard-detection interval for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on antitachycardia pacing and shock delivery: the ADVANCE III randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309(18):1903–11. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.4598.CrossRefPubMed Gasparini M, Proclemer A, Klersy C, Kloppe A, Lunati M, Ferrer JB, et al. Effect of long-detection interval vs standard-detection interval for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on antitachycardia pacing and shock delivery: the ADVANCE III randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309(18):1903–11. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2013.​4598.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wathen MS, De Groot PJ, Sweeney MO, Stark AJ, Otterness MF, Adkisson WO, et al. Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: PainFREE Rx II Trial Results. Circulation. 2004;104:796–801. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000145610.64014.E4.CrossRef Wathen MS, De Groot PJ, Sweeney MO, Stark AJ, Otterness MF, Adkisson WO, et al. Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: PainFREE Rx II Trial Results. Circulation. 2004;104:796–801. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​01.​CIR.​0000145610.​64014.​E4.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zipes DP, Barber MJ, Takahashi N, Gilmour RF. Influence of the autonomic nervous system on the genesis of cardiac arrhythmias. Pacing ClinElectrophysiol. 1983;6:1210–20.CrossRef Zipes DP, Barber MJ, Takahashi N, Gilmour RF. Influence of the autonomic nervous system on the genesis of cardiac arrhythmias. Pacing ClinElectrophysiol. 1983;6:1210–20.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nademanee K, Taylor R, Bailey WE, Rieders DE, Kosar EM. Treating electrical storm: sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy. Circulation. 2000;102(7):742–7.CrossRef Nademanee K, Taylor R, Bailey WE, Rieders DE, Kosar EM. Treating electrical storm: sympathetic blockade versus advanced cardiac life support-guided therapy. Circulation. 2000;102(7):742–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference •• Chatzidou S, Kontogiannis C, Tsilimigras DI, Georgiopoulos G, Kosmopoulos M, Papadopoulou E, et al. Propranolol versus metoprolol for treatment of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am CollCardiol. 2018;71(17):1897–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.056 Findings from this study suggest that non-selective β1 and β2 blockade is superior to β1 blockade in the management of electrical storm. CrossRef •• Chatzidou S, Kontogiannis C, Tsilimigras DI, Georgiopoulos G, Kosmopoulos M, Papadopoulou E, et al. Propranolol versus metoprolol for treatment of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am CollCardiol. 2018;71(17):1897–906. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2018.​02.​056 Findings from this study suggest that non-selective β1 and β2 blockade is superior to β1 blockade in the management of electrical storm. CrossRef
28.
go back to reference •• Santangeli P, Muser D, Maeda S, Filtz A, Zado ES, Frankel DS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1552–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.004 Findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the role of both antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation for the reduction of ICD shocks. Notably, the lack of a mortality benefit highlights the need for further research. CrossRefPubMed •• Santangeli P, Muser D, Maeda S, Filtz A, Zado ES, Frankel DS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1552–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​hrthm.​2016.​03.​004 Findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the role of both antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation for the reduction of ICD shocks. Notably, the lack of a mortality benefit highlights the need for further research. CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Anderson KP. Sudden cardiac death unresponsive to implantable defibrillator therapy: an urgent target for clinicians, industry and government. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005;14:71–8.CrossRef Anderson KP. Sudden cardiac death unresponsive to implantable defibrillator therapy: an urgent target for clinicians, industry and government. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005;14:71–8.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Huang S, Miller J. Catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Elsevier Editions, 3rd Edition. Huang S, Miller J. Catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Elsevier Editions, 3rd Edition.
54.
go back to reference • Vaseghi M, Barwad P, MalavassiCorrales FJ, Tandri H, Mathuria N, Shah R, et al. Cardiac sympathetic denervation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(25):3070–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04 The largest series of patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias undergoing cardiac sympathetic denervation highlights the adjunctive role of this approach in patients with electrical storm.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral • Vaseghi M, Barwad P, MalavassiCorrales FJ, Tandri H, Mathuria N, Shah R, et al. Cardiac sympathetic denervation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(25):3070–80. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2017.​04 The largest series of patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias undergoing cardiac sympathetic denervation highlights the adjunctive role of this approach in patients with electrical storm.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
go back to reference Fudim M, Boortz-Marx R, Ganesh A, Waldron NH, Qadri YJ, Patel CB, et al. Stellate ganglion blockade for the treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28(12):1460–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13324.CrossRef Fudim M, Boortz-Marx R, Ganesh A, Waldron NH, Qadri YJ, Patel CB, et al. Stellate ganglion blockade for the treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28(12):1460–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jce.​13324.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Electrical Storm: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives
Authors
Christos Kontogiannis
Konstantinos Tampakis
Georgios Georgiopoulos
Stefano Bartoletti
Christos Papageorgiou
Hector Anninos
Alkistis Kapelouzou
Michael Spartalis
Ioannis Paraskevaidis
Sofia Chatzidou
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1190-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Current Cardiology Reports 9/2019 Go to the issue

Hypertension (DS Geller and DL Cohen, Section Editors)

Primary Aldosteronism: Cardiovascular Outcomes Pre- and Post-treatment

Lipid Abnormalities and Cardiovascular Prevention (G De Backer, Section Editor)

Contributions of Interactions Between Lifestyle and Genetics on Coronary Artery Disease Risk

Lipid Abnormalities and Cardiovascular Prevention (G De Backer, Section Editor)

Lp(a): Addressing a Target for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Pericardial Disease (AL Klein and CL Jellis, Section Editors)

Radiation-Associated Pericardial Disease