Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2011

01-06-2011

Towards a personalised approach to aftercare: a review of cancer follow-up in the UK

Authors: Nicola J. Davies, Lynn Batehup

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Due to growth in cancer survivorship and subsequent resource limitations, the current UK position of follow-up services is unsustainable. With people living longer after a cancer diagnosis, supported self-management for ongoing treatment-related chronic conditions is a fundamental component of aftercare services. Alternative models to traditional hospital aftercare require consideration in terms of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Methods

‘Evidence to Inform the Cancer Reform Strategy: The Clinical Effectiveness of Follow-Up Services after Treatment for Cancer’ (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 2007) has been updated using a number of quality-controlled databases. Correspondence with experts was also sought to identify current initiatives.

Result

The review highlights a shift towards patient empowerment via individualised and group education programmes aimed at increasing survivor’s ability to better manage their condition and the effects of treatment, allowing for self-referral or rapid access to health services when needed. The role of specialist nurses as key facilitators of supportive aftercare is emphasised, as is a move towards technology-based aftercare in the form of telephone or web-based services.

Conclusions

The challenge will be replacing traditional clinic follow-up with alternative methods in a cost-effective way that is either as equally effective, or more so. To establish this, more rigorous trials are needed, with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up assessments.

Implications for cancer survivors

Increasing patient confidence to initiate follow-up specific to their needs is likely to increase the workload of primary care providers, who will need training for this.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cardy P. Worried Sick: the emotional impact of cancer. 2006, Macmillan Cancer Support. Cardy P. Worried Sick: the emotional impact of cancer. 2006, Macmillan Cancer Support.
2.
go back to reference Macmillian Cancer Support. Two Million Reasons: The Cancer Survivorship Agenda. 2008. Macmillian Cancer Support. Two Million Reasons: The Cancer Survivorship Agenda. 2008.
3.
go back to reference Allberry J. Cancer Reform Strategy: Maintaining Momentum, Building for the Future – First Annual Report. Department of Health, December 2008. Allberry J. Cancer Reform Strategy: Maintaining Momentum, Building for the Future – First Annual Report. Department of Health, December 2008.
4.
go back to reference Lorig K, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. (1999) Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14.PubMedCrossRef Lorig K, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. (1999) Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) Evidence to inform the Cancer Reform Strategy: The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of follow-up services after treatment for cancer. 2007, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) Evidence to inform the Cancer Reform Strategy: The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of follow-up services after treatment for cancer. 2007, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
6.
go back to reference Collins RF, Bekker H, Dodwell DJ. Follow-up care of patients treated for breast cancer: a structured review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30:19–35.PubMedCrossRef Collins RF, Bekker H, Dodwell DJ. Follow-up care of patients treated for breast cancer: a structured review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30:19–35.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidance on cancer services – improving outcomes in breast cancer. 2002, NICE. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidance on cancer services – improving outcomes in breast cancer. 2002, NICE.
8.
go back to reference Grogan M, Rangan A, Gebski V, et al. The value of follow-up of patients with early breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Breast. 2002;11:163–69.PubMedCrossRef Grogan M, Rangan A, Gebski V, et al. The value of follow-up of patients with early breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Breast. 2002;11:163–69.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Richard CS, McLeod R. Follow-up of patients after resection for colorectal cancer: a position paper of the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology and the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Can J Surg. 1997;40:90–100.PubMed Richard CS, McLeod R. Follow-up of patients after resection for colorectal cancer: a position paper of the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology and the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Can J Surg. 1997;40:90–100.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jeffery M, Hickey B, Hider PN. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. . Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007(1). Jeffery M, Hickey B, Hider PN. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. . Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007(1).
11.
go back to reference Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, et al. Mechanisms of improved survival from intensive follow up in colorectal cancer: a hypothesis. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:430–33.PubMed Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, et al. Mechanisms of improved survival from intensive follow up in colorectal cancer: a hypothesis. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:430–33.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rosen M, Chan L, Beart RW, et al. Follow-up of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1116–26.PubMedCrossRef Rosen M, Chan L, Beart RW, et al. Follow-up of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1116–26.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Younes RN, Gross J, Deheinzelin D. Follow-up in lung cancer: how often and for what purpose? Chest. 1999;115:1494–99.PubMedCrossRef Younes RN, Gross J, Deheinzelin D. Follow-up in lung cancer: how often and for what purpose? Chest. 1999;115:1494–99.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:848–54.PubMedCrossRef Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:848–54.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Cole D, Stewart J, et al. Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1996;313:665–9.PubMed Grunfeld E, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Cole D, Stewart J, et al. Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1996;313:665–9.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Brown L, Payne S, Royle G. Patient initiated follow up of breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2002;11:346–55.PubMedCrossRef Brown L, Payne S, Royle G. Patient initiated follow up of breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2002;11:346–55.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Koinberg IL, Fridlund B, Engholm GB, Holmberg L. Nurse-led follow-up on demand or by a physician after breast cancer surgery: a randomised study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8:109–17.PubMedCrossRef Koinberg IL, Fridlund B, Engholm GB, Holmberg L. Nurse-led follow-up on demand or by a physician after breast cancer surgery: a randomised study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8:109–17.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Baildam AD, Keeling F, Thompson L, Bundred N, Hopwood P. Nurse-led surgical follow up clinics for women treated for breast cancer – a randomised controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88:S136–7. Baildam AD, Keeling F, Thompson L, Bundred N, Hopwood P. Nurse-led surgical follow up clinics for women treated for breast cancer – a randomised controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88:S136–7.
20.
go back to reference Gulliford T, Opomu M, Wilson E, Hanham I, Epstein R. Popularity of less frequent follow up for breast cancer in randomised study: initial findings from the hotline study. BMJ. 1997;314:174–7.PubMed Gulliford T, Opomu M, Wilson E, Hanham I, Epstein R. Popularity of less frequent follow up for breast cancer in randomised study: initial findings from the hotline study. BMJ. 1997;314:174–7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kokko R, Hakama M, Holli K. Follow-up cost of breast cancer patients with localized disease after primary treatment: a randomised trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;93:255–60.PubMedCrossRef Kokko R, Hakama M, Holli K. Follow-up cost of breast cancer patients with localized disease after primary treatment: a randomised trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;93:255–60.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Oltra A, Santaballa A, Munárriz B, Pastor M, Montalar J. Cost-benefit analysis of a follow-up program in patients with breast cancer: a randomized prospective study. Breast J. 2007;13(6):571–4.PubMedCrossRef Oltra A, Santaballa A, Munárriz B, Pastor M, Montalar J. Cost-benefit analysis of a follow-up program in patients with breast cancer: a randomized prospective study. Breast J. 2007;13(6):571–4.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Macafee DA, Whynes D, Scholefield JH. Risk-stratified intensive follow up for treated colorectal cancer - realistic and cost saving? Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(3):222–30.PubMedCrossRef Macafee DA, Whynes D, Scholefield JH. Risk-stratified intensive follow up for treated colorectal cancer - realistic and cost saving? Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(3):222–30.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Snyder CF, Earle C, Herbert RJ, Neville BA, Blackford AL, Frick KD. Trends in follow-up and preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(3):254–9.PubMedCrossRef Snyder CF, Earle C, Herbert RJ, Neville BA, Blackford AL, Frick KD. Trends in follow-up and preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(3):254–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Melloni B. Follow-up of patients with curative-intent surgical resection. in press., NSCLC. Melloni B. Follow-up of patients with curative-intent surgical resection. in press., NSCLC.
26.
go back to reference Montgomery DA, Krupa K, Wilson C, Cooke TG. Automated telephone follow-up after breast cancer: an acceptability and feasibility pilot study. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(5):704–10.PubMedCrossRef Montgomery DA, Krupa K, Wilson C, Cooke TG. Automated telephone follow-up after breast cancer: an acceptability and feasibility pilot study. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(5):704–10.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Moore S, Corner J, Haviland J, et al. Nurse-led follow-up and conventional medical follow-up in management of patients with lung cancer: randomised trial. BMJ. 2002;325:1145–47.PubMedCrossRef Moore S, Corner J, Haviland J, et al. Nurse-led follow-up and conventional medical follow-up in management of patients with lung cancer: randomised trial. BMJ. 2002;325:1145–47.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Beaver K. Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ. 2009;338(7690):337–40. Beaver K. Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ. 2009;338(7690):337–40.
29.
go back to reference Sheppard C, Higgins B, Wise M, Yiangou C, Dubois D, Kilburn S. Breast cancer follow up: a randomised controlled trial comparing point of need access versus routine 6-monthly clinical review. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009;13(1):2–8. Epub 2008 Dec 31.PubMedCrossRef Sheppard C, Higgins B, Wise M, Yiangou C, Dubois D, Kilburn S. Breast cancer follow up: a randomised controlled trial comparing point of need access versus routine 6-monthly clinical review. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009;13(1):2–8. Epub 2008 Dec 31.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Koinberg I, Engholm G-B, et al. A health economic evaluation of follow-up after breast cancer surgery: results of an rct study. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):99–104.PubMedCrossRef Koinberg I, Engholm G-B, et al. A health economic evaluation of follow-up after breast cancer surgery: results of an rct study. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):99–104.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mandelblatt JS, Cullen J, Lawrence WF, Stanton AL, Yi B, Kwan L, et al. Economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial of psycho-educational interventions to improve adjustment to survivorship among patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;1;26(10):1684–90.CrossRef Mandelblatt JS, Cullen J, Lawrence WF, Stanton AL, Yi B, Kwan L, et al. Economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial of psycho-educational interventions to improve adjustment to survivorship among patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;1;26(10):1684–90.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pinto B. (unpublished) Physical activity promotion in cancer follow-up care. Pinto B. (unpublished) Physical activity promotion in cancer follow-up care.
33.
go back to reference Fletcher SG, Clark S, Overstreet DL, Steers WD. An improved approach to follow-up care for the urological patient: drop-in group medical appointments. J Urol. 2006;176(3):1122–6.PubMedCrossRef Fletcher SG, Clark S, Overstreet DL, Steers WD. An improved approach to follow-up care for the urological patient: drop-in group medical appointments. J Urol. 2006;176(3):1122–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Maher J, Jackson L. Patient-triggered follow-up for breast cancer survivors. Ongoing study., Hillingdon Breast Unit Mount Vernon Cancer Centre. Maher J, Jackson L. Patient-triggered follow-up for breast cancer survivors. Ongoing study., Hillingdon Breast Unit Mount Vernon Cancer Centre.
35.
go back to reference Chapman D, Cox E, Britton PD, Wishart GC. Patient-led breast cancer follow up. Breast. 2009;18:100–2.PubMedCrossRef Chapman D, Cox E, Britton PD, Wishart GC. Patient-led breast cancer follow up. Breast. 2009;18:100–2.PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
go back to reference Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, Scher K, Sabbatini P, Hensley M, et al. Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3552–61.PubMedCrossRef Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, Scher K, Sabbatini P, Hensley M, et al. Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3552–61.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Wright P. A web-based two-way information platform for use in low risk cancer survivors post-treatment. ongoing study.: Psychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group, St James’s Institute of Oncology, ongoing study. Wright P. A web-based two-way information platform for use in low risk cancer survivors post-treatment. ongoing study.: Psychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group, St James’s Institute of Oncology, ongoing study.
40.
go back to reference Richardson A, John J, Kelly J, Armes J, Ream E (2009). Surviving Cancer, Living Life” Support Service: An Evaluation. King’s College London. Richardson A, John J, Kelly J, Armes J, Ream E (2009). Surviving Cancer, Living Life” Support Service: An Evaluation. King’s College London.
41.
go back to reference Dunn J, WM, Taggert F, Hulme C, Tritter J, Austoker J, et al.. Involving patients in clinical trial design: the experience of the UK iBreast early breast cancer follow-up trial in Poster presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Clinical Trials. 2009. Dunn J, WM, Taggert F, Hulme C, Tritter J, Austoker J, et al.. Involving patients in clinical trial design: the experience of the UK iBreast early breast cancer follow-up trial in Poster presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Clinical Trials. 2009.
42.
go back to reference Wille-Jørgensen P, Laurberg S, Påhlman L, Carriquiry L, Lundqvist N, Smedh K, et al. An interim analysis of recruitment to the COLOFOL trial. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(7):756–8. Wille-Jørgensen P, Laurberg S, Påhlman L, Carriquiry L, Lundqvist N, Smedh K, et al. An interim analysis of recruitment to the COLOFOL trial. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(7):756–8.
43.
go back to reference Sheppard C, Higgins B, Wise M, Yiangou C, Dubois D, Kilburn S (2009) Breast cancer follow up: a randomised controlled trial comparing point of need access versus routine 6-monthly clinical review. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009; Feb;13(1):2-8. Epub 2008 Dec 31. Chapman D, C.E., Britton PD, Wishart GC, Patient-led breast cancer follow up. The Breast 2009; 18:100–102. Sheppard C, Higgins B, Wise M, Yiangou C, Dubois D, Kilburn S (2009) Breast cancer follow up: a randomised controlled trial comparing point of need access versus routine 6-monthly clinical review. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009; Feb;13(1):2-8. Epub 2008 Dec 31. Chapman D, C.E., Britton PD, Wishart GC, Patient-led breast cancer follow up. The Breast 2009; 18:100–102.
44.
go back to reference Dent J, Allinson A. Self-referral for breast cancer follow-up. ongoing study: Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust Hospital Trust. Dent J, Allinson A. Self-referral for breast cancer follow-up. ongoing study: Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust Hospital Trust.
45.
go back to reference Dunn J, WM, Taggert F, Hulme C, Tritter J, Austoker J, Mossman J, et al. Involving patients in clinical trial design: The experience of the UK iBreast early breast cancer follow-up trial in Poster presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Clinical Trials. 2009. Dunn J, WM, Taggert F, Hulme C, Tritter J, Austoker J, Mossman J, et al. Involving patients in clinical trial design: The experience of the UK iBreast early breast cancer follow-up trial in Poster presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Clinical Trials. 2009.
46.
go back to reference Basch E, Iasonos A., Barz A, Culkin A, Kris MG, Artz D, et al. Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(34):5374–80. Basch E, Iasonos A., Barz A, Culkin A, Kris MG, Artz D, et al. Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(34):5374–80.
47.
go back to reference Pinto BM, Goldstein MG, Papandonatos GD. Promoting physical activity in follow-up care for breast cancer patients. Presented at the Society of Behavioral Medicine Annual Meeting. 2009; Apr 2009. Pinto BM, Goldstein MG, Papandonatos GD. Promoting physical activity in follow-up care for breast cancer patients. Presented at the Society of Behavioral Medicine Annual Meeting. 2009; Apr 2009.
Metadata
Title
Towards a personalised approach to aftercare: a review of cancer follow-up in the UK
Authors
Nicola J. Davies
Lynn Batehup
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0165-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine