Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2011

01-06-2011

The experiences of unpartnered men with prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis

Authors: Meredith Wallace Kazer, Janet Harden, Matthew Burke, Martin G. Sanda, Jill Hardy, Donald E. Bailey, PROSTQA Study Group

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine how men without partners make decisions about prostate cancer treatment, manage treatment side effects, and obtain information and support.

Background

In 2009, it was projected that over 230,000 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer. While treatment options vary, these options result in changes within the man that can affect his quality of life. Research has shown that often spouses play a central role in men’s choice of treatment and in maintaining men’s quality of life. In addition, spouses are the major providers of emotional support and physical care. However, little is known about how men without partners cope with prostate cancer. Prior research seldom addresses how diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer affects the quality of life of men without partners.

Methods

Because very little is known about the needs of men without partners managing prostate cancer, qualitative analysis of data obtained during semi-structure interviews provided respondents with an opportunity to share the lived experience of prostate cancer. A semi-structured interview was conducted with selected, consenting men. The sample was drawn from the ongoing R01 study of men with prostate cancer (PROSTQA).

Results

The sample for this study included 17 unpartnered prostate cancer survivors. The ages of participants ranged from 47 to 72 with a mean age of 63. The participants had between zero and two co-morbidities with an average of one co-morbidity per participant. The sample was 82% Caucasian and 17% Black. A total of 35% of the participants reported “some college” (n = 6), 30% graduated from college (n = 5), and 23% went to graduate school (n = 4). One participant reported that he was a high school graduate and one had less than a high school education. Five themes emerged from the data: going it alone, diagnosis and prostate cancer treatment decision-making, sources of information and support, the aftermath of prostate cancer, and coping strategies.

Conclusions

This study provides information about unpartnered men’s prostate cancer experience. This information will help health care professionals to meet the needs of unpartnered more effectively and help them to assist men as they adapt to living with this chronic illness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(4):225–49.PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(4):225–49.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Litwin MS, Sadetsky N, Pasta DJ, Lubeck DP. Bowel function and bother after treatment for early stage prostate cancer: a longitudinal quality of life analysis from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2004;172:515–9.PubMedCrossRef Litwin MS, Sadetsky N, Pasta DJ, Lubeck DP. Bowel function and bother after treatment for early stage prostate cancer: a longitudinal quality of life analysis from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2004;172:515–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hu JC, Elkin EP, Pasta DJ, Lubeck DP, Katttan MW, Carroll PR, et al. Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: results from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2004;171:703–8.PubMedCrossRef Hu JC, Elkin EP, Pasta DJ, Lubeck DP, Katttan MW, Carroll PR, et al. Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: results from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2004;171:703–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hedestig O, Sandman P, Tomic R, Widmark A. Living after external beam radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2005;28(4):310–7.PubMedCrossRef Hedestig O, Sandman P, Tomic R, Widmark A. Living after external beam radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2005;28(4):310–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ward-Smith P, Kapitan D. Quality of life among men treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Urol Nurs. 2005;25(4):263–8.PubMed Ward-Smith P, Kapitan D. Quality of life among men treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Urol Nurs. 2005;25(4):263–8.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Novan L, Morag A. Advanced prostate cancer patients’ relationships with their spouses following hormonal therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2003;7:73–80.CrossRef Novan L, Morag A. Advanced prostate cancer patients’ relationships with their spouses following hormonal therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2003;7:73–80.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Harden J, Schafenacker A, Northouse LL, Mood D, Smith D, Pienta K, et al. Couples’ experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29(4):701–9.PubMedCrossRef Harden J, Schafenacker A, Northouse LL, Mood D, Smith D, Pienta K, et al. Couples’ experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29(4):701–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Harden J, Northouse LL, Mood D. Qualitative analysis of couples’ experience with prostate cancer by age cohort. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29(5):367–77.PubMedCrossRef Harden J, Northouse LL, Mood D. Qualitative analysis of couples’ experience with prostate cancer by age cohort. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29(5):367–77.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Maliski SL, Heilemann MV, McCorkle R. From “death sentence” to “good cancer”: couples’ transformation of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Nurs Res. 2002;51(6):391–7.PubMedCrossRef Maliski SL, Heilemann MV, McCorkle R. From “death sentence” to “good cancer”: couples’ transformation of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Nurs Res. 2002;51(6):391–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jakobsson L, Hallberg IR, Loven L. Experiences of daily life and life quality in men with prostate cancer: an exploratory study. Part 1. Eur J Cancer Care. 1997;6:108–11.CrossRef Jakobsson L, Hallberg IR, Loven L. Experiences of daily life and life quality in men with prostate cancer: an exploratory study. Part 1. Eur J Cancer Care. 1997;6:108–11.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Krongrad A, Lai H, Burke MA, Goodkin K, Lai S. Marriage and mortality in prostate cancer. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1696–1700.PubMedCrossRef Krongrad A, Lai H, Burke MA, Goodkin K, Lai S. Marriage and mortality in prostate cancer. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1696–1700.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Denberg TD, Beaty BL, Kim FJ, Steiner JF. Marriage and ethnicity predict treatment in localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103(9):1819–25.PubMedCrossRef Denberg TD, Beaty BL, Kim FJ, Steiner JF. Marriage and ethnicity predict treatment in localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103(9):1819–25.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Perczek RE, Burke MA, Carver CS, Krongrad A, Terris MK. Facing a prostate cancer diagnosis: who is at risk for increased distress? Cancer. 2002;94(11):2923–9.PubMedCrossRef Perczek RE, Burke MA, Carver CS, Krongrad A, Terris MK. Facing a prostate cancer diagnosis: who is at risk for increased distress? Cancer. 2002;94(11):2923–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1250–61.PubMedCrossRef Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1250–61.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Newell GR, Pollack ES, Spitz MR, Sider JG, Fueger JJ. Incidence of prostate cancer and marital status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987;79(2):259–62.PubMed Newell GR, Pollack ES, Spitz MR, Sider JG, Fueger JJ. Incidence of prostate cancer and marital status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987;79(2):259–62.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Korfage IJ, de Koning HJ, Roobol M, Schroder FH, Essink-Bot ML. Prostate cancer diagnosis: the impact on patients’ mental health. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(2):165–70.PubMedCrossRef Korfage IJ, de Koning HJ, Roobol M, Schroder FH, Essink-Bot ML. Prostate cancer diagnosis: the impact on patients’ mental health. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(2):165–70.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ben-Tovim DI, Dougherty MLG, Stapleton AMF, Pinnock CB. Coping with prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis using a new instrument, the centre for clinical excellence in urological research coping with cancer instrument. Urology. 2002;59(3):383–8. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01540-0.PubMedCrossRef Ben-Tovim DI, Dougherty MLG, Stapleton AMF, Pinnock CB. Coping with prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis using a new instrument, the centre for clinical excellence in urological research coping with cancer instrument. Urology. 2002;59(3):383–8. doi:10.​1016/​S0090-4295(01)01540-0.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Thaxton L, Emshoff JG, Guessous O. Prostate cancer support groups: literature review. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2005;23(1):25–40.PubMedCrossRef Thaxton L, Emshoff JG, Guessous O. Prostate cancer support groups: literature review. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2005;23(1):25–40.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Crighton FL. University Kansas research paper. 2002. p. 165. Crighton FL. University Kansas research paper. 2002. p. 165.
24.
go back to reference Harden J, Schafenacker A, Northouse L, Mood D, Pienta K, Hussain M, et al. Couples experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29:701–9.PubMedCrossRef Harden J, Schafenacker A, Northouse L, Mood D, Pienta K, Hussain M, et al. Couples experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29:701–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S, Norman A, Eeles K, Huddart R, Dearnaley D, Watson NM. Prostate cancer patient’s support and psychological care needs: Survey from a Non-Surgical Oncology Clinic. 2002; 50 Lintz K, Moynihan C, Steginga S, Norman A, Eeles K, Huddart R, Dearnaley D, Watson NM. Prostate cancer patient’s support and psychological care needs: Survey from a Non-Surgical Oncology Clinic. 2002; 50
26.
27.
go back to reference Robinson A, Thomson R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care. 2001;10 Suppl 1:34–8. Robinson A, Thomson R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care. 2001;10 Suppl 1:34–8.
28.
go back to reference Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:54–9.PubMed Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:54–9.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–8.PubMedCrossRef Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Broom A. The eMale: prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. J Sociol. 2005;41(1):87–104.CrossRef Broom A. The eMale: prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. J Sociol. 2005;41(1):87–104.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Smither AR, Guralnick ML, Davis NB, See WA. Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using objective pad test data. BMC Urology. 2007; 7(2) Smither AR, Guralnick ML, Davis NB, See WA. Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using objective pad test data. BMC Urology. 2007; 7(2)
34.
go back to reference Siegel T, Moul JW, Spevak M, Alvord WG, Costabile RA. The development of erectile dysfunction in men treated for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;165(2):430–5.PubMedCrossRef Siegel T, Moul JW, Spevak M, Alvord WG, Costabile RA. The development of erectile dysfunction in men treated for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;165(2):430–5.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Yoshioka Y. Current status and perspectives of brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2009;14:31–6.PubMedCrossRef Yoshioka Y. Current status and perspectives of brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2009;14:31–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. Psychosom Med. 1993;55(3):234–47.PubMed Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. Psychosom Med. 1993;55(3):234–47.PubMed
Metadata
Title
The experiences of unpartnered men with prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis
Authors
Meredith Wallace Kazer
Janet Harden
Matthew Burke
Martin G. Sanda
Jill Hardy
Donald E. Bailey
PROSTQA Study Group
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0157-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine