Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Internal and Emergency Medicine 3/2013

01-04-2013 | IM - ORIGINAL

Patient preferences and willingness to pay for different options of anticoagulant therapy

Authors: Marco Moia, Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani, Monica Carpenedo, Luciana Scalone, Mara Silvia Monzini, Giancarlo Cesana, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci

Published in: Internal and Emergency Medicine | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

New anticoagulant drugs alternative to vitamin K antagonists are currently under clinical evaluation. Patient’s preferences should be considered in the development of new therapeutic strategies. Our study aim was to elicit patient preferences, and estimate their willingness to pay for the different treatment options. A Discrete Choice Experiment was administered to patients consecutively attending an anticoagulation clinic, either on stable oral anticoagulant therapy, or during their first visit at the time of starting therapy. Six treatment characteristics were analysed: route and number of medication administrations, frequency of monitoring, risk of some minor bleeding, the amount of attention required for drug/food interactions, requirement for dose adjustment, and out-of-pocket treatment cost. Relationships between patient’s preferences and their characteristics were analysed. 255 patients participated (55 % men, with a mean age 64 years; 35.7 % on stable therapy). A statistically significant importance was attributed to all but two characteristics (the amount of attention required for interaction with other drugs/food and for dose adjustment.) Monthly patient willingness to pay was € 79 for tablets versus injections; € 41 for once-daily versus twice-daily tablets, € 25 for drugs without risk of minor bleeding events and € 20 for once-monthly versus twice-monthly monitoring. Patients on stable therapy considered more important the amount of attention required for drug/food interactions than did the starters. Younger or working patients considered the reduction of monitoring frequency more important than did the older or not working patients (retired, housewives). This study elicited preferences from patients on oral anticoagulant therapy with a simple and well established method, which allows to obtain information warranted for planning optimal healthcare.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E (2004) The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists. The seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 126:204S–233SPubMedCrossRef Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E (2004) The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists. The seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 126:204S–233SPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sullivan PW, Arant TW, Ellis SL, Ulrich H (2006) The cost effectiveness of anticoagulation management services for patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 24(10):1021–1033PubMedCrossRef Sullivan PW, Arant TW, Ellis SL, Ulrich H (2006) The cost effectiveness of anticoagulation management services for patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 24(10):1021–1033PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Di Nisio M, Middeldorp S, Büller HR (2005) Direct thrombin inhibitors. N Engl J Med 353:1028–1040PubMedCrossRef Di Nisio M, Middeldorp S, Büller HR (2005) Direct thrombin inhibitors. N Engl J Med 353:1028–1040PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mannucci PM, Franchini M (2011) Old and new anticoagulant drugs: a minireview. Ann Med 43:116–123PubMedCrossRef Mannucci PM, Franchini M (2011) Old and new anticoagulant drugs: a minireview. Ann Med 43:116–123PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mannucci PM, Nobili A, Garattini S (2012) New drugs for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Eur J Intern Med 23:1–5PubMedCrossRef Mannucci PM, Nobili A, Garattini S (2012) New drugs for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Eur J Intern Med 23:1–5PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ryan M (1999) A role for conjoint analysis in technology assessment in health care? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15(3):443–457PubMed Ryan M (1999) A role for conjoint analysis in technology assessment in health care? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15(3):443–457PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya–Amaya M (2008) Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya–Amaya M (2008) Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Louvier JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) State choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRef Louvier JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) State choice methods: analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bland M (1995) An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press, England Bland M (1995) An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford University Press, England
11.
12.
go back to reference Nobili A, Garattini S, Mannucci PM (2011) Multiple diseases and polypharmacy in the elderly: challenges for the internist of the third millennium. J Comorb 1:28–44 Nobili A, Garattini S, Mannucci PM (2011) Multiple diseases and polypharmacy in the elderly: challenges for the internist of the third millennium. J Comorb 1:28–44
Metadata
Title
Patient preferences and willingness to pay for different options of anticoagulant therapy
Authors
Marco Moia
Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani
Monica Carpenedo
Luciana Scalone
Mara Silvia Monzini
Giancarlo Cesana
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1828-0447
Electronic ISSN: 1970-9366
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-012-0844-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Internal and Emergency Medicine 3/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.