Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Letter to the Editor/LED Reply

Response to Letter to the Editor: Single-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (SAGB): Appraisal of Clinical Evidence (OBES SURG DOI 10.1007/s11695-014-1369-9)

Authors: Yu-Hung Lin, Wei-Jei Lee

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Firstly, we would like to thank Prof. Deitel, Dr. Kular, and Prof. Chevallier for their comments on the controversy on renaming mini-gastric bypass (MGB). From the letter, we could identify several names of this procedure, so it is easy to get confused from the society. The purpose of renaming is to unify the names and make it easier to be identified in scientific publications or communications. For the scientific committee, “single-anastomosis” seems to be more favorable, so it is used for the topic of the upcoming postgraduate course in Montreal. And this might be a chance for the society to raise a discussion about which one of them we are going to use. …
Metadata
Title
Response to Letter to the Editor: Single-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (SAGB): Appraisal of Clinical Evidence (OBES SURG DOI 10.1007/s11695-014-1369-9)
Authors
Yu-Hung Lin
Wei-Jei Lee
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1418-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Obesity Surgery 12/2014 Go to the issue