Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 12/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Original Contributions

Buttressing the Staple Line: A Randomized Comparison Between Staple-Line Reinforcement Versus No Reinforcement During Sleeve Gastrectomy

Authors: Shashank S. Shah, Jayashree S. Todkar, Poonam S. Shah

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Bariatric surgery is recommended for Indian patients with body mass index (BMI) >32.5 kg/m2 with at least one comorbidity and >37.5 kg/m2 without a comorbidity. In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, bleeding and leakage from the staple line are common post-operative events. Peri-Strips Dry® with Veritas® (PSD-V) is used in staple-line reinforcement. This was a single-investigator, multicenter, randomized study of 100 patients undergoing standard sleeve gastrectomy with a 34 or 36 French bougie. Patients were randomized 1:1 to PSD-V or control groups; no buttress material was used in the control group. The primary objective was to assess complication rates (any staple-line bleed or leak from the intra-operative visit through day 30) associated with sleeve gastrectomy. Surgical time (from first incision to closure of last incision) and the number of clips and/or sutures used to control bleeding were also assessed. Fewer staple-line bleeds were observed in the PSD-V group than the control group (23/51 [45.1 %] vs 39/49 [79.6 %] patients; p = 0.0005), and the bleeding was of a lower severity (p = 0.0002). No staple-line leaks were observed. Surgical time was shorter in patients who received PSD-V (58.8 vs 72.8 min; p = 0.0153), and fewer patients required hemostatic clips and/or sutures (10/51 [19.6 %] vs 33/49 [67.3 %] patients; p < 0.0001). Fewer patients in the PSD-V than the control group experienced adverse events (2/51 [3.9 %] vs 5/49 [10.2 %] patients). The use of PSD-V reduced the incidence and severity of staple-line bleeding and was associated with a reduction in surgical time compared with no staple-line reinforcement.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Deurenberg-Yap M, Chew SK, Lin VF, Tan BY, van Staveren WA, Deurenberg P. Relationships between indices of obesity and its co-morbidities in multi-ethnic Singapore. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(10):1554–62. PMID: 11673781.PubMedCrossRef Deurenberg-Yap M, Chew SK, Lin VF, Tan BY, van Staveren WA, Deurenberg P. Relationships between indices of obesity and its co-morbidities in multi-ethnic Singapore. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(10):1554–62. PMID: 11673781.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vikram NK, Pandey RM, Misra A, Sharma R, Rama Devi J, Khanna N. Non-obese (body mass index < 25 kg/m2) Asian Indians with normal waist circumference have high cardiovascular risk. Nutrition. 2003;19(6):503–9. PMID: 12781849.PubMedCrossRef Vikram NK, Pandey RM, Misra A, Sharma R, Rama Devi J, Khanna N. Non-obese (body mass index < 25 kg/m2) Asian Indians with normal waist circumference have high cardiovascular risk. Nutrition. 2003;19(6):503–9. PMID: 12781849.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, et al. Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:163–70. PMID: 19582986.PubMed Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, et al. Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:163–70. PMID: 19582986.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21 Suppl 1:S1–S27. PMID: 23529939.CrossRef Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21 Suppl 1:S1–S27. PMID: 23529939.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A, et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16(9):1138–44. PMID: 16989696.PubMedCrossRef Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A, et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16(9):1138–44. PMID: 16989696.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Khatri K, Singh K, Sayegh M. Use of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2884–91. PMID: 21424198.PubMedCrossRef Sajid MS, Khatri K, Singh K, Sayegh M. Use of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2884–91. PMID: 21424198.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Finks JF, Carlin A, Share D, et al. Effect of surgical techniques on clinical outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass—results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(3):284–9. PMID: 21126927.PubMedCrossRef Finks JF, Carlin A, Share D, et al. Effect of surgical techniques on clinical outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass—results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(3):284–9. PMID: 21126927.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, Cohen RV, Novaes JA, Schiavon CA. Staple line reinforcement with new biomaterial increased burst strength pressure: an animal study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(3):397–9. PMID: 16925361.PubMedCrossRef Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, Cohen RV, Novaes JA, Schiavon CA. Staple line reinforcement with new biomaterial increased burst strength pressure: an animal study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(3):397–9. PMID: 16925361.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kawamura M, Kase K, Sawafuji M, Watanabe M, Horinouchi H, Kobayashi K. Staple-line reinforcement with a new type of polyglycolic acid felt. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11(1):43–6. PMID: 11269555.PubMed Kawamura M, Kase K, Sawafuji M, Watanabe M, Horinouchi H, Kobayashi K. Staple-line reinforcement with a new type of polyglycolic acid felt. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11(1):43–6. PMID: 11269555.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Shikora S. The use of staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1313–20. PMID: 15603644.PubMedCrossRef Shikora S. The use of staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1313–20. PMID: 15603644.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stamou K, Menenakos E, Dardamanis D, et al. Prospective comparative study of the efficacy of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(11):3526–30. PMID: 21638186.PubMedCrossRef Stamou K, Menenakos E, Dardamanis D, et al. Prospective comparative study of the efficacy of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(11):3526–30. PMID: 21638186.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Alley J, Fenton S, Harnisch M, Angeletti M, Peterson R. Integrated bioabsorbable tissue reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2011;21(8):1311–5. PMID: 21088926.PubMedCrossRef Alley J, Fenton S, Harnisch M, Angeletti M, Peterson R. Integrated bioabsorbable tissue reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2011;21(8):1311–5. PMID: 21088926.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Longoria M, Welbourne S, Sabio A, Wilson SE. Glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement reduces staple site bleeding during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2005;140(8):773–8. PMID: 16103288.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Longoria M, Welbourne S, Sabio A, Wilson SE. Glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement reduces staple site bleeding during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2005;140(8):773–8. PMID: 16103288.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dapri G, Cadière G, Himpens J. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three different techniques. Obes Surg. 2010;20(4):462–7. PMID 20012507.PubMedCrossRef Dapri G, Cadière G, Himpens J. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three different techniques. Obes Surg. 2010;20(4):462–7. PMID 20012507.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Flessas J, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing two different techniques. Preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):42–6. PMID: 21533880.PubMedCrossRef Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Flessas J, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing two different techniques. Preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):42–6. PMID: 21533880.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hajj G, Haddad J. Preventing staple-line leak in sleeve gastrectomy: reinforcement with bovine pericardium vs oversewing. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1915–21. PMID: 23975327.PubMedCrossRef Hajj G, Haddad J. Preventing staple-line leak in sleeve gastrectomy: reinforcement with bovine pericardium vs oversewing. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1915–21. PMID: 23975327.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, et al. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19. PMID: 22248433.PubMedCrossRef Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, et al. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19. PMID: 22248433.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rawlins L, Rawlins MP, Teel 2nd D. Human tissue thickness measurements from excised sleeve gastrectomy specimens. Surg Endoc. 2014;28(3):811–4. PMID: 241965553.CrossRef Rawlins L, Rawlins MP, Teel 2nd D. Human tissue thickness measurements from excised sleeve gastrectomy specimens. Surg Endoc. 2014;28(3):811–4. PMID: 241965553.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, Brady R, Vroegop T, Serveld M. The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1290–8. PMID: 15603641.PubMedCrossRef Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, Brady R, Vroegop T, Serveld M. The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1290–8. PMID: 15603641.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chen B, Kiriakopoulos A, Tsakayannis D, Wachtel M, Linos D, Frezza E. Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg. 2009;19(2):166–72. PMID: 18795383.PubMedCrossRef Chen B, Kiriakopoulos A, Tsakayannis D, Wachtel M, Linos D, Frezza E. Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg. 2009;19(2):166–72. PMID: 18795383.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Buttressing the Staple Line: A Randomized Comparison Between Staple-Line Reinforcement Versus No Reinforcement During Sleeve Gastrectomy
Authors
Shashank S. Shah
Jayashree S. Todkar
Poonam S. Shah
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1374-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Obesity Surgery 12/2014 Go to the issue