Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2019

01-06-2019 | Care | Original Research

Patients’ and Providers’ Views on Causes and Consequences of Healthcare Fragmentation in the Ambulatory Setting: a Qualitative Study

Authors: Lisa M. Kern, MD, MPH, Monika M. Safford, MD, Masha J. Slavin, MD, Evguenia Makovkina, BA, Ahd Fudl, BA, J. Emilio Carrillo, MD, Erika L. Abramson, MD, MS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with chronic conditions routinely see multiple outpatient providers, who may or may not communicate with each other. Gaps in information across providers caring for the same patient can lead to harm for patients. However, the exact causes and consequences of healthcare fragmentation are not understood well enough to design interventions to address them.

Objective

We sought to elicit patients’ and providers’ views on the causes and consequences of healthcare fragmentation.

Design and Participants

We conducted a qualitative study with focus groups of patients and, separately, of providers (attending physicians and nurse practitioners) at an academic hospital-based primary care practice in New York City in June–August 2017. Patient participants were English-speaking adults with ≥ 2 chronic conditions.

Approach

Each focus group lasted 1 h and asked the same two questions: “Why do you think some patients receive care from many different providers and others do not?” and “What do you think happens as a result of patients receiving care from many different providers?” Data collection continued until a point of data saturation was reached. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes.

Key Results

We conducted 6 focus groups with a total of 46 participants (25 patients and 21 providers). Study participants identified 41 unique causes of fragmentation, which originate from 4 different levels of the healthcare system (patient, provider, healthcare organization, and healthcare environment); most causes were not related to medical need. Participants also identified 24 unique consequences of fragmentation, of which 3 were desirable and 21 were undesirable.

Conclusions

The results of this study offer a granular roadmap for how to decrease healthcare fragmentation. The large number and severity of negative consequences (including medical errors, misdiagnosis, increased cost, and provider burnout) underscore the urgent need for interventions to address this problem directly.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elhauge E, ed. The fragmentation of U.S. health care: Oxford University Press; 2010. Elhauge E, ed. The fragmentation of U.S. health care: Oxford University Press; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Pham HH, Schrag D, O'Malley AS, Wu B, Bach PB. Care patterns in Medicare and their implications for pay for performance. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1130–9.CrossRefPubMed Pham HH, Schrag D, O'Malley AS, Wu B, Bach PB. Care patterns in Medicare and their implications for pay for performance. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1130–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pham HH, O'Malley AS, Bach PB, Saiontz-Martinez C, Schrag D. Primary care physicians’ links to other physicians through Medicare patients: the scope of care coordination. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:236–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pham HH, O'Malley AS, Bach PB, Saiontz-Martinez C, Schrag D. Primary care physicians’ links to other physicians through Medicare patients: the scope of care coordination. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:236–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference O'Malley AS, Reschovsky JD. Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:56–65.PubMed O'Malley AS, Reschovsky JD. Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:56–65.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Nyweide DJ, Anthony DL, Bynum JP, et al. Continuity of care and the risk of preventable hospitalization in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1879–85.CrossRefPubMed Nyweide DJ, Anthony DL, Bynum JP, et al. Continuity of care and the risk of preventable hospitalization in older adults. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1879–85.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Frandsen BR, Joynt KE, Rebitzer JB, Jha AK. Care fragmentation, quality, and costs among chronically ill patients. Am J Manag Care 2015;21:355–62.PubMed Frandsen BR, Joynt KE, Rebitzer JB, Jha AK. Care fragmentation, quality, and costs among chronically ill patients. Am J Manag Care 2015;21:355–62.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Burwell SM. Setting value-based payment goals--HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. N Engl J Med 2015;372:897–9.CrossRefPubMed Burwell SM. Setting value-based payment goals--HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. N Engl J Med 2015;372:897–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Berwick DM. Making good on ACOs’ promise--the final rule for the Medicare shared savings program. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1753–6.CrossRefPubMed Berwick DM. Making good on ACOs’ promise--the final rule for the Medicare shared savings program. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1753–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ornstein SM, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG, Litvin CB. The prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity in primary care practice: a PPRNet report. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:518–24.CrossRefPubMed Ornstein SM, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG, Litvin CB. The prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity in primary care practice: a PPRNet report. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:518–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pope C, Mays N, eds. Qualitative Research in Health Care, 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000. Pope C, Mays N, eds. Qualitative Research in Health Care, 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000.
13.
go back to reference Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G, eds. A framework for a systems approach to health care delivery. Building a better delivery system: A new engineering/health care partnership. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005. Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G, eds. A framework for a systems approach to health care delivery. Building a better delivery system: A new engineering/health care partnership. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
15.
go back to reference Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 2012;307:1513–6.CrossRef Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 2012;307:1513–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials. JAMA 2009;301:603–18.CrossRefPubMed Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials. JAMA 2009;301:603–18.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Barnett ML, McWilliams JM. Changes in specialty care use and leakage in Medicare accountable care organizations. Am J Manag Care 2018;24:e141–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Barnett ML, McWilliams JM. Changes in specialty care use and leakage in Medicare accountable care organizations. Am J Manag Care 2018;24:e141–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference McWilliams JM, Chernew ME, Dalton JB, Landon BE. Outpatient care patterns and organizational accountability in Medicare. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:938–45.CrossRefPubMed McWilliams JM, Chernew ME, Dalton JB, Landon BE. Outpatient care patterns and organizational accountability in Medicare. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:938–45.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patients’ and Providers’ Views on Causes and Consequences of Healthcare Fragmentation in the Ambulatory Setting: a Qualitative Study
Authors
Lisa M. Kern, MD, MPH
Monika M. Safford, MD
Masha J. Slavin, MD
Evguenia Makovkina, BA
Ahd Fudl, BA
J. Emilio Carrillo, MD
Erika L. Abramson, MD, MS
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04859-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.