Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Research

Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors: Alison M. Holliday, MPH, Allen Kachalia, MD JD, Gregg S. Meyer, MD MSc, Thomas D. Sequist, MD MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Numerical ratings and narrative comments about physicians are increasingly available online. These physician rating websites include independent websites reporting crowd-sourced data from online users and health systems reporting data from their internal patient experience surveys.

Objective

To assess patient and physician views on physician rating websites.

Design

Cross-sectional physician (electronic) and patient (paper) surveys conducted in August 2015.

Participants

Eight hundred twenty-eight physicians (response rate 43%) affiliated with one of four hospitals in a large accountable care organization in eastern Massachusetts; 494 adult patients (response rate 34%) who received care in this system in May 2015.

Main Measures

Use and perceptions of physician rating websites.

Key Results

Fifty-three percent of physicians and 39% of patients reported visiting a physician rating website at least once. Physicians reported higher levels of agreement with the accuracy of numerical data (53%) and narrative comments (62%) from health system patient experience surveys compared to numerical data (36%) and narrative comments (36%) on independent websites. Patients reported higher levels of agreement with trusting the accuracy of data obtained from independent websites (57%) compared to health system patient experience surveys (45%). Twenty-one percent of physicians and 51% of patients supported posting narrative comments online for all consumers. The majority (78%) of physicians believed that posting narrative comments online would increase physician job stress; smaller proportions perceived a negative effect on the physician–patient relationship (46%), health care overuse (34%), and patient-reported experiences of care (33%). Over one-fourth of patients (29%) believed that posting narrative comments would cause them to be less open.

Conclusions

Physicians and patients have different views on whether independent or health system physician rating websites are the more reliable source of information. Their views on whether such data should be shared on public websites are also discordant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis M. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 2014;311(7):734–5.CrossRefPubMed Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis M. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 2014;311(7):734–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK. Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(9):942–946.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK. Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(9):942–946.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Anhang Price R, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality. Med Care Res Rev. 2014;71(5):522–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anhang Price R, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality. Med Care Res Rev. 2014;71(5):522–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D, et al. Taking Patients’ Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(7):675–9.CrossRefPubMed Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D, et al. Taking Patients’ Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(7):675–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Goldstein E, Farquhar M, Crofton C, Darby C, Garfinkel S. Measuring hospital care from the patients’ perspective: An overview of the CAHPS hospital survey development process. H Serv Res. 2005;40(6):1977–1995.CrossRef Goldstein E, Farquhar M, Crofton C, Darby C, Garfinkel S. Measuring hospital care from the patients’ perspective: An overview of the CAHPS hospital survey development process. H Serv Res. 2005;40(6):1977–1995.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. J Med Internet Res 2015. Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K. General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. J Med Internet Res 2015.
10.
go back to reference Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications; 2005. Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications; 2005.
12.
go back to reference Terlutter R, Bidmon S, Rottl J. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Terlutter R, Bidmon S, Rottl J. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference West C. Physician Well-Being: Expanding the Triple Aim. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. West C. Physician Well-Being: Expanding the Triple Aim. J Gen Intern Med. 2016.
14.
go back to reference Lopez A, Detz A, Ratanawongsa N, Sarkar U. What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(6):685–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lopez A, Detz A, Ratanawongsa N, Sarkar U. What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(6):685–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study
Authors
Alison M. Holliday, MPH
Allen Kachalia, MD JD
Gregg S. Meyer, MD MSc
Thomas D. Sequist, MD MPH
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-3982-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.