Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Research

Rates and Correlates of Potentially Inappropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration

Authors: Adam A. Powell, PhD, MBA, Sameer D. Saini, MD, MS, Matthew K. Breitenstein, PhD, MS, Siamak Noorbaloochi, PhD, Andrea Cutting, MA, Deborah A. Fisher, MD, MHS, Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH, Krysten Halek, MA, Melissa R. Partin, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening procedures can inflate healthcare costs and increase medical risk. Little is known about the prevalence or causes of inappropriate CRC screening.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate CRC screening, and its association with patient and facility characteristics in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) .

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of all VHA patients aged 50 years and older who completed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or a screening colonoscopy between 1 October 2009 and 31 December 2011 (n = 1,083,965).

MAIN MEASURES

Measures included: proportion of patients whose test was classified as potentially inappropriate; associations between potentially inappropriate screening and patient demographic and health characteristics, facility complexity, CRC screening rates, dependence on FOBT, and CRC clinical reminder attributes.

KEY RESULTS

Of 901,292 FOBT cases, 26.1 % were potentially inappropriate (13.9 % not due, 7.8 % limited life expectancy, 11.0 % receiving FOBT when colonoscopy was indicated). Of 134,335 screening colonoscopies, 14.2 % were potentially inappropriate (10.4 % not due, 4.4 % limited life expectancy). Each additional 10 years of patient age was associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing potentially inappropriate screening (ORs = 1.60 to 1.83 depending on screening mode). Compared to facilities scoring in the bottom third on a measure of reliance on FOBT (versus screening colonoscopy), facilities scoring in the top third were less likely to conduct potentially inappropriate FOBTs (OR = 0.,78) but more likely to conduct potentially inappropriate colonoscopies (OR = 2.20). Potentially inappropriate colonoscopies were less likely to be conducted at facilities where primary care providers were assigned partial responsibility (OR = 0.74) or full responsibility (OR = 0.73) for completing the CRC clinical reminder.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of VHA CRC screening tests are potentially inappropriate. Establishing processes that enforce appropriate screening intervals, triage patients with limited life expectancies, and discourage the use of FOBTs when a colonoscopy is indicated may reduce inappropriate testing.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–117.CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–117.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–141.CrossRefPubMed Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–141.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, Thompson TD, Seeff LC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Colorectal cancer screening - United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ. 2011;60:42–46. Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, Thompson TD, Seeff LC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Colorectal cancer screening - United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ. 2011;60:42–46.
5.
go back to reference US Preventive Services. Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637.CrossRef US Preventive Services. Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: A decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):659–669.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: A decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):659–669.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O'Brien S, Walter LC. Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2013;346:e8441.CrossRefPubMed Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O'Brien S, Walter LC. Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2013;346:e8441.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: A targeted, updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):638–658.CrossRefPubMed Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: A targeted, updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):638–658.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: Magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20(4):659–671.CrossRefPubMed Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: Magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20(4):659–671.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fisher DA, Judd L, Sanford NS. Inappropriate colorectal cancer screening: Findings and implications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(11):2526–2530.CrossRefPubMed Fisher DA, Judd L, Sanford NS. Inappropriate colorectal cancer screening: Findings and implications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(11):2526–2530.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ahmed FMD, Murthy UKMD. Inappropriate and improper use of fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening in the VA medical system. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(6):1401.CrossRefPubMed Ahmed FMD, Murthy UKMD. Inappropriate and improper use of fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening in the VA medical system. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(6):1401.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo Y, Riall TS, Goodwin JS. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: Variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):542–550.CrossRefPubMed Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo Y, Riall TS, Goodwin JS. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: Variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):542–550.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1335–1343.CrossRefPubMed Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1335–1343.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Partin MR, Powell AA, Bangerter A, et al. Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(12):1618–1625.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Partin MR, Powell AA, Bangerter A, et al. Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(12):1618–1625.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–619.CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–619.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Iversen LH, Norgaard M, Jacobsen J, Laurberg S, Sorensen HT. The impact of comorbidity on survival of Danish colorectal cancer patients from 1995 to 2006: A population-based cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):71–78.CrossRefPubMed Iversen LH, Norgaard M, Jacobsen J, Laurberg S, Sorensen HT. The impact of comorbidity on survival of Danish colorectal cancer patients from 1995 to 2006: A population-based cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):71–78.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Cho H, Klabunde CN, Yabroff KR, et al. Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy: A new tool to inform recommendations for optimal screening strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(10):667–676.CrossRefPubMed Cho H, Klabunde CN, Yabroff KR, et al. Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy: A new tool to inform recommendations for optimal screening strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(10):667–676.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, Konety BR. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006;296(19):2336–2342.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, Konety BR. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006;296(19):2336–2342.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Walter LC, Lindquist K, Nugent S, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(7):465–473.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Walter LC, Lindquist K, Nugent S, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(7):465–473.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ioannou GN, Chapko MK, Dominitz JA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(9):2082–2091.CrossRefPubMed Ioannou GN, Chapko MK, Dominitz JA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(9):2082–2091.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(2):389–394.CrossRefPubMed Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(2):389–394.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Partin M, Noorbaloochi S, Grill J, et al. The interrelationships between and contributions of background, cognitive, and environmental factors to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Causes and Control. 2010;21(9):1357–1368.CrossRefPubMed Partin M, Noorbaloochi S, Grill J, et al. The interrelationships between and contributions of background, cognitive, and environmental factors to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Causes and Control. 2010;21(9):1357–1368.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Stefos T, LaVallee N, Holden F. Fairness in prospective payment: A clustering approach. Health Serv Res. 1992;27(2):239.PubMedCentralPubMed Stefos T, LaVallee N, Holden F. Fairness in prospective payment: A clustering approach. Health Serv Res. 1992;27(2):239.PubMedCentralPubMed
27.
go back to reference Fisher DA, Jeffreys A, Coffman CJ, Fasanella K. Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1232–1235.CrossRefPubMed Fisher DA, Jeffreys A, Coffman CJ, Fasanella K. Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1232–1235.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Etzioni DA, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, et al. Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: The importance of follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):1002–1010.CrossRefPubMed Etzioni DA, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, et al. Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: The importance of follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):1002–1010.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Burnand B, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Froehlich F, Vader JP, Gonvers JJ. Use, appropriateness, and diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy: An international observational study (EPAGE). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(7):1018–1026.CrossRefPubMed Burnand B, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Froehlich F, Vader JP, Gonvers JJ. Use, appropriateness, and diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy: An international observational study (EPAGE). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(7):1018–1026.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Baron TH, Kimery BD, Sorbi D, Gorkis LC, Leighton JA, Fleischer DE. Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: Guidelines in an open endoscopy practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(2):178–182.CrossRefPubMed Baron TH, Kimery BD, Sorbi D, Gorkis LC, Leighton JA, Fleischer DE. Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: Guidelines in an open endoscopy practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(2):178–182.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Mahajan RJ, Barthel JS, Marshall JB. Appropriateness of referrals for open-access endoscopy: How do physicians in different medical specialties do? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(18):2065–2069.CrossRefPubMed Mahajan RJ, Barthel JS, Marshall JB. Appropriateness of referrals for open-access endoscopy: How do physicians in different medical specialties do? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(18):2065–2069.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(44):881–888. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(44):881–888.
Metadata
Title
Rates and Correlates of Potentially Inappropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration
Authors
Adam A. Powell, PhD, MBA
Sameer D. Saini, MD, MS
Matthew K. Breitenstein, PhD, MS
Siamak Noorbaloochi, PhD
Andrea Cutting, MA
Deborah A. Fisher, MD, MHS
Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH
Krysten Halek, MA
Melissa R. Partin, PhD
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3163-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.