Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2013

01-07-2013 | Health Policy

Variation in Electronic Health Record Adoption and Readiness for Meaningful Use: 2008–2011

Authors: Vaishali Patel, MPH, PhD, Eric Jamoom, PhD, MS, MPH, Chun-Ju Hsiao, PhD, MHS, Michael F. Furukawa, PhD, Melinda Buntin, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Federal initiatives are underway that provide physicians with financial incentives for meaningful use (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) and assistance to purchase and implement EHRs.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine readiness and interest in MU among primary care physicians and specialists, and identify factors that may affect their readiness to obtain MU incentives.

DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed 4 years of data (2008–2011) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Supplement, an annual cross-sectional nationally representative survey of non-federally employed office-based physicians.

MAIN MEASURES

Survey-weighted EHR adoption rates, potential to meet selected MU criteria, and self-reported intention to apply for MU incentives. We also examined the association between physician and practice characteristics and readiness for MU.

KEY RESULTS

The overall sample consisted of 10,889 respondents, with weighted response rates of 62 % (2008); 74 % (2009); 66 % (2010); and 61 % (2011). Primary care physicians’ adoption of EHRs with the potential to meet MU nearly doubled from 2009 to 2011 (18 % to 38 %, p < 0.01), and was significantly higher than specialists (19 %) in 2011 (p < 0.01). In 2011, half of physicians (52 %) expressed their intention to apply for MU incentives; this did not vary by specialty. Multivariate analyses report that EHR adoption was significantly higher in both 2010 and 2011 compared to 2009, and primary care physicians and physicians working in larger or multi-specialty practices or for HMOs were more likely to adopt EHRs with the potential to meet MU.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician EHR adoption rates increased in advance of MU incentive payments. Although interest in MU incentives did not vary by specialty, primary care physicians had significantly higher rates of adopting EHRs with the potential to meet MU. Addressing barriers to EHR adoption, which may vary by specialty, will be important to enhancing coordination of care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):464–71.CrossRef Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):464–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Buntin MB, Jain SH, Blumenthal D. Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(6):1214–9.CrossRef Buntin MB, Jain SH, Blumenthal D. Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(6):1214–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic Health Record Systems and Intent to Apply for Meaningful Use Incentives Among Office-Based Physician Practices: United States, 2001–2011. NCHS Data Brief, No79. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2011. Hsiao CJ, Hing E, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic Health Record Systems and Intent to Apply for Meaningful Use Incentives Among Office-Based Physician Practices: United States, 2001–2011. NCHS Data Brief, No79. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2011.
4.
go back to reference DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50–60.PubMedCrossRef DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50–60.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):507–12.PubMedCrossRef Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):507–12.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bramble JD, Galt KA, Siracuse MV, Abbott AA, Drincic A, Paschal KA, et al. The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records. Health Care Manag Rev. 2010;35(1):55–64.CrossRef Bramble JD, Galt KA, Siracuse MV, Abbott AA, Drincic A, Paschal KA, et al. The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records. Health Care Manag Rev. 2010;35(1):55–64.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rao SR, Desroches CM, Donelan K, Campbell EG, Miralles PD, Jha AK. Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(3):271–5.PubMedCrossRef Rao SR, Desroches CM, Donelan K, Campbell EG, Miralles PD, Jha AK. Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(3):271–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Menachemi N, Powers TL, Brooks RG. Physician and practice characteristics associated with longitudinal increases in electronic health records adoption. J Healthc Manag. 2011;56(3):183–97.PubMed Menachemi N, Powers TL, Brooks RG. Physician and practice characteristics associated with longitudinal increases in electronic health records adoption. J Healthc Manag. 2011;56(3):183–97.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–4.PubMedCrossRef Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–4.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Maxson E, Jain S, Kendall M, Mostashari F, Blumenthal D. The regional extension center program: helping physicians meaningfully use health information technology. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(10):666–70.PubMedCrossRef Maxson E, Jain S, Kendall M, Mostashari F, Blumenthal D. The regional extension center program: helping physicians meaningfully use health information technology. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(10):666–70.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hsiao CJ, Beatty PC, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA, Sisk JE. Electronic medical record/electronic health record use by office-based physicians: United States, 2008 and preliminary 2009. National Center for Health Statistics Health E-stat. Hsiao CJ, Beatty PC, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA, Sisk JE. Electronic medical record/electronic health record use by office-based physicians: United States, 2008 and preliminary 2009. National Center for Health Statistics Health E-stat.
13.
go back to reference Hsiao CJ, Burt CW, Rechsteiner E, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Sisk JE. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians: United States, 2008; 2008. National Center for Health Statistics Health E-stat. Hsiao CJ, Burt CW, Rechsteiner E, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Sisk JE. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians: United States, 2008; 2008. National Center for Health Statistics Health E-stat.
14.
go back to reference Marcotte L, Seidman J, Trudel K, et al. Achieving meaningful use of health information technology: a guide for physicians to the EHR incentive programs. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(9):731–6.PubMedCrossRef Marcotte L, Seidman J, Trudel K, et al. Achieving meaningful use of health information technology: a guide for physicians to the EHR incentive programs. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(9):731–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Microdatafile; 2008. National Center for Health Statistics. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Microdatafile; 2008.
16.
go back to reference Bitton A, Martin C, Landon BE. A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):584–92.PubMedCrossRef Bitton A, Martin C, Landon BE. A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):584–92.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kern LM, Barron Y, Abramson EL, Patel V, Kaushal R. HEAL NY: promoting interoperable health information technology in New York State. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):493–504.CrossRef Kern LM, Barron Y, Abramson EL, Patel V, Kaushal R. HEAL NY: promoting interoperable health information technology in New York State. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):493–504.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE. Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(5):1108–14.CrossRef Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE. Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(5):1108–14.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Corey C Grossman JM. Clinical Information Technology Adoption Varies Across Physician Specialties. Center for Health System Change; 2007; 34. Corey C Grossman JM. Clinical Information Technology Adoption Varies Across Physician Specialties. Center for Health System Change; 2007; 34.
20.
go back to reference Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM. The patient-centered medical home: will it stand the test of health reform? JAMA. 2009;301(19):2038–40.PubMedCrossRef Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM. The patient-centered medical home: will it stand the test of health reform? JAMA. 2009;301(19):2038–40.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bruen BK, Ku L, Burke MF, Buntin MB. More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):472–80.CrossRef Bruen BK, Ku L, Burke MF, Buntin MB. More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):472–80.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Abramson EL, Kaushal R. Computerized provider order entry and patient safety. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2012;59(6):1247–55.CrossRef Abramson EL, Kaushal R. Computerized provider order entry and patient safety. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2012;59(6):1247–55.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wolfstadt JI, Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Lee M, Kalkar S, Wu W, Rochon PA. The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):451–8. Review.PubMedCrossRef Wolfstadt JI, Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Lee M, Kalkar S, Wu W, Rochon PA. The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(4):451–8. Review.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(12):1409–16. Review.PubMedCrossRef Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(12):1409–16. Review.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kern LM, Barrón Y, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Edwards A, Kaushal R; with the HITEC Investigators. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2237-8. Kern LM, Barrón Y, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Edwards A, Kaushal R; with the HITEC Investigators. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; doi:10.​1007/​s11606-012-2237-8.
27.
go back to reference Cebul RD, Love TE, Jain AK, Hebert CJ. Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(9):825–33.PubMedCrossRef Cebul RD, Love TE, Jain AK, Hebert CJ. Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(9):825–33.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Abramson EL, Barron Y, Quaresimo J, Kaushal R. Electronic prescribing within an electronic health record reduces ambulatory prescribing errors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011;37(10):470–8.PubMed Abramson EL, Barron Y, Quaresimo J, Kaushal R. Electronic prescribing within an electronic health record reduces ambulatory prescribing errors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011;37(10):470–8.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Jain A, McCarthy K, Xu M, Stoller JK. Impact of a clinical decision support system in an electronic health record to enhance detection of alpha-antitrypsin deficiency. Chest. 2011;140(1):198–204.PubMedCrossRef Jain A, McCarthy K, Xu M, Stoller JK. Impact of a clinical decision support system in an electronic health record to enhance detection of alpha-antitrypsin deficiency. Chest. 2011;140(1):198–204.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bell LM, Grundmeier R, Localio R, et al. Electronic health record-based decision support to improve asthma care: a cluster-randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):e770–7.PubMedCrossRef Bell LM, Grundmeier R, Localio R, et al. Electronic health record-based decision support to improve asthma care: a cluster-randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):e770–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Chen C, Garrido T, Chock D, Okawa G, Liang L. The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):323–33.CrossRef Chen C, Garrido T, Chock D, Okawa G, Liang L. The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):323–33.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Cai B, Shimizu I. Electronic Medical Record Systems Nonresponse Bias Analysis for 2011 NAMCS Mail Survey. Joint Statistical Meeting; 2012. Cai B, Shimizu I. Electronic Medical Record Systems Nonresponse Bias Analysis for 2011 NAMCS Mail Survey. Joint Statistical Meeting; 2012.
33.
go back to reference Jamoom E, Beatty P, Bercovitz A, Woodwell D, Palso K, Rechtsteiner E. Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems: United States, 2011. NCHS Data Brief, No 98. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012. Jamoom E, Beatty P, Bercovitz A, Woodwell D, Palso K, Rechtsteiner E. Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems: United States, 2011. NCHS Data Brief, No 98. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
34.
go back to reference Ventres WB, Frankel RM. Patient-centered care and electronic health records: it’s still about the relationship. Fam Med. 2010;42(5):364–6.PubMed Ventres WB, Frankel RM. Patient-centered care and electronic health records: it’s still about the relationship. Fam Med. 2010;42(5):364–6.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Variation in Electronic Health Record Adoption and Readiness for Meaningful Use: 2008–2011
Authors
Vaishali Patel, MPH, PhD
Eric Jamoom, PhD, MS, MPH
Chun-Ju Hsiao, PhD, MHS
Michael F. Furukawa, PhD
Melinda Buntin, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2324-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.