Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Original Research

Electronic Health Record Impact on Work Burden in Small, Unaffiliated, Community-Based Primary Care Practices

Authors: Jenna Howard, PhD, Elizabeth C. Clark, MD, MPH, Asia Friedman, PhD, Jesse C. Crosson, PhD, Maria Pellerano, MA, MBA, MPH, Benjamin F. Crabtree, PhD, Ben-Tzion Karsh, PhD, Carlos R. Jaen, MD, PhD, Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD, Deborah J. Cohen, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

The use of electronic health records (EHR) is widely recommended as a means to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of US healthcare. Relatively little is known, however, about how implementation and use of this technology affects the work of clinicians and support staff who provide primary health care in small, independent practices.

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of EHR use on clinician and staff work burden in small, community-based primary care practices.

DESIGN

We conducted in-depth field research in seven community-based primary care practices. A team of field researchers spent 9–14 days over a 4–8 week period observing work in each practice, following patients through the practices, conducting interviews with key informants, and collecting documents and photographs. Field research data were coded and analyzed by a multidisciplinary research team, using a grounded theory approach.

PARTICIPANTS

All practice members and selected patients in seven community-based primary care practices in the Northeastern US.

KEY RESULTS

The impact of EHR use on work burden differed for clinicians compared to support staff. EHR use reduced both clerical and clinical staff work burden by improving how they check in and room patients, how they chart their work, and how they communicate with both patients and providers. In contrast, EHR use reduced some clinician work (i.e., prescribing, some lab-related tasks, and communication within the office), while increasing other work (i.e., charting, chronic disease and preventive care tasks, and some lab-related tasks). Thoughtful implementation and strategic workflow redesign can mitigate the disproportionate EHR-related work burden for clinicians, as well as facilitate population-based care.

CONCLUSIONS

The complex needs of the primary care clinician should be understood and considered as the next iteration of EHR systems are developed and implemented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–752.PubMed Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–752.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1103–1117.CrossRef Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1103–1117.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Apkon M, Singhaviranon P. Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(1):122–130.PubMedCrossRef Apkon M, Singhaviranon P. Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(1):122–130.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roukema J, Los R, Bleeker S, Ginneken A, Lei J, Moll H. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2006;117:15–21.PubMedCrossRef Roukema J, Los R, Bleeker S, Ginneken A, Lei J, Moll H. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2006;117:15–21.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. . In: Medicine Io, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. . In: Medicine Io, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
6.
go back to reference Bates D, Gawande A. Patient safety: improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2526–2534.PubMedCrossRef Bates D, Gawande A. Patient safety: improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2526–2534.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rosenbloom ST, Talbert D, Aronsky D. Clinicians’ perceptions of clinical decision support integrated into computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Informat. 2004;73(5):433–441.CrossRef Rosenbloom ST, Talbert D, Aronsky D. Clinicians’ perceptions of clinical decision support integrated into computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Informat. 2004;73(5):433–441.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Khajouei R, Wiereng P, Hasman A, Jaspers M. Clinicians satisfaction with CPOE ease of use and effect on clinicians’ workflow, efficiency and medication safety. Int J Med Informat. 2011;80:297–309.CrossRef Khajouei R, Wiereng P, Hasman A, Jaspers M. Clinicians satisfaction with CPOE ease of use and effect on clinicians’ workflow, efficiency and medication safety. Int J Med Informat. 2011;80:297–309.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference El-Kareh R, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, et al. Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(4):464–468.PubMedCrossRef El-Kareh R, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, et al. Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(4):464–468.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):505–516.PubMedCrossRef Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):505–516.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Koppel R, Metlay J, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1197–1203.PubMedCrossRef Koppel R, Metlay J, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1197–1203.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Saitwal H, Feng X, Walji M, Patel V, Zhanga J. Assessing performance of an Electronic Health Record (EHR) using Cognitive Task Analysis. Int J Med Informat. 2010;79:501–506.CrossRef Saitwal H, Feng X, Walji M, Patel V, Zhanga J. Assessing performance of an Electronic Health Record (EHR) using Cognitive Task Analysis. Int J Med Informat. 2010;79:501–506.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Campbell E, Sittig D, Ash J, Guappone K, Dykstra R. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2006;13(5):547–556.CrossRef Campbell E, Sittig D, Ash J, Guappone K, Dykstra R. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2006;13(5):547–556.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ash J, Sittig D, Poon E, Guappone K, Campbell E, Dykstra R. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2007;14(4):415–423.CrossRef Ash J, Sittig D, Poon E, Guappone K, Campbell E, Dykstra R. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2007;14(4):415–423.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Samaan ZM, Klein MD, Mansour ME, DeWitt TG. The impact of the electronic health record on an academic pediatric primary care center. J Ambul Care Manage. 2009;32(3):180–187.PubMed Samaan ZM, Klein MD, Mansour ME, DeWitt TG. The impact of the electronic health record on an academic pediatric primary care center. J Ambul Care Manage. 2009;32(3):180–187.PubMed
16.
go back to reference McAlearney A, Robbins J, Hirschd A, Jorina M, Harropa J. Perceived efficiency impacts following electronic health record implementation: an exploratory study of an urban community health center network. Int J Med Informat. 2010;79:807–816.CrossRef McAlearney A, Robbins J, Hirschd A, Jorina M, Harropa J. Perceived efficiency impacts following electronic health record implementation: an exploratory study of an urban community health center network. Int J Med Informat. 2010;79:807–816.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, et al. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38(3):176–188.PubMedCrossRef Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, et al. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38(3):176–188.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lo H, Newmark L, Yoon C, et al. Electronic health records in specialty care: a time-motion study. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2007;14(5):609–615.CrossRef Lo H, Newmark L, Yoon C, et al. Electronic health records in specialty care: a time-motion study. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2007;14(5):609–615.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Daniel G, Ewen E, Willey V, Reese C, Shirazi F, Malone D. Efficiency and economic benefits of a payer-based electronic health record in an emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(8):824–833.PubMedCrossRef Daniel G, Ewen E, Willey V, Reese C, Shirazi F, Malone D. Efficiency and economic benefits of a payer-based electronic health record in an emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(8):824–833.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Miller R, Sim I, Newman J. Electronic medical records: Lessons from small physician practices. California HealthCare Foundation. 2003:1–27. Miller R, Sim I, Newman J. Electronic medical records: Lessons from small physician practices. California HealthCare Foundation. 2003:1–27.
21.
go back to reference Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):507–512.PubMedCrossRef Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):507–512.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Torda P, Han ES, Scholle SH. Easing the adoption and use of electronic health records in small practices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(4):668–675.CrossRef Torda P, Han ES, Scholle SH. Easing the adoption and use of electronic health records in small practices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(4):668–675.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ross S, Schilling L, Fernald D, Davidson A, West D. Health information exchange in small-to-medium sized family medicine practices: motivators, barriers, and potential facilitators of adoption. Int J Med Informat. 2010;79:123–129.CrossRef Ross S, Schilling L, Fernald D, Davidson A, West D. Health information exchange in small-to-medium sized family medicine practices: motivators, barriers, and potential facilitators of adoption. Int J Med Informat. 2010;79:123–129.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Overhage J, Perkins S, Tierney W, McDonald C. Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians’ time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2001;14(4):361–371.CrossRef Overhage J, Perkins S, Tierney W, McDonald C. Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians’ time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2001;14(4):361–371.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference DesRoches C, Donelan K, Buerhaus P, Zhonghe L. Registered nurses’ use of electronic health records: findings from a national survey. Medscape J Med. 2008;10(7):164.PubMed DesRoches C, Donelan K, Buerhaus P, Zhonghe L. Registered nurses’ use of electronic health records: findings from a national survey. Medscape J Med. 2008;10(7):164.PubMed
26.
go back to reference LaDuke S. Online nursing documentation: finding a middle ground. JONA. 2001;31(6):283–286.CrossRef LaDuke S. Online nursing documentation: finding a middle ground. JONA. 2001;31(6):283–286.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cohen D, McDaniel R, Crabtree B. A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice. J Healthc Manag. 2004;49(3):155–168.PubMed Cohen D, McDaniel R, Crabtree B. A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice. J Healthc Manag. 2004;49(3):155–168.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340.CrossRef Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Davis F, Bagozzi P, Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003.CrossRef Davis F, Bagozzi P, Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Davis F. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis Sci. 1996;27(3):451–481.CrossRef Venkatesh V, Davis F. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis Sci. 1996;27(3):451–481.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.CrossRef Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Morris M. Why do not men ever stop to ask for directions? General, social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q. 2000;24(1):115–139.CrossRef Venkatesh V, Morris M. Why do not men ever stop to ask for directions? General, social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q. 2000;24(1):115–139.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Venkash V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F, Venkatesh VMM, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478. Venkash V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F, Venkatesh VMM, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478.
34.
go back to reference Holden R, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. 2010. 2010;43(1):159-172. Holden R, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. 2010. 2010;43(1):159-172.
35.
go back to reference Pommerenke F, Dietrich A. Improving and maintaining preventive services. Part I: applying the patient path model. J Fam Pract. 1992;34(1):86–91.PubMed Pommerenke F, Dietrich A. Improving and maintaining preventive services. Part I: applying the patient path model. J Fam Pract. 1992;34(1):86–91.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990.
37.
go back to reference Borkan J. Immersion/Crystallization. In: Crabtree, B and Miller, W, eds. Doing Qualitative Research 2nd ed; 1999. Borkan J. Immersion/Crystallization. In: Crabtree, B and Miller, W, eds. Doing Qualitative Research 2nd ed; 1999.
38.
go back to reference Amatayakul M. Why workflow redesign alone is not enough for EHR success Healthcare Financial Management 2011(March):130–132. Amatayakul M. Why workflow redesign alone is not enough for EHR success Healthcare Financial Management 2011(March):130–132.
39.
go back to reference Beasley J, Wetterneck T, Temte J, et al. Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2011;24:745–751.CrossRef Beasley J, Wetterneck T, Temte J, et al. Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2011;24:745–751.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Chesluk BJ, Holmboe ES. How teams work—or don’t–in primary care: a field study on internal medicine practices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):874–879.CrossRef Chesluk BJ, Holmboe ES. How teams work—or don’t–in primary care: a field study on internal medicine practices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):874–879.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Nelson BA, Massey R. Implementing an electronic change-of-shift report using transforming care at the bedside processes and methods. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(4):162–168.PubMedCrossRef Nelson BA, Massey R. Implementing an electronic change-of-shift report using transforming care at the bedside processes and methods. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(4):162–168.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sinsky CA, Sinsky TA, Althaus D, Tranel J, Thiltgen M. Practice profile. ‘Core teams’: nurse-physician partnerships provide patient-centered care at an Iowa practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):966–968.CrossRef Sinsky CA, Sinsky TA, Althaus D, Tranel J, Thiltgen M. Practice profile. ‘Core teams’: nurse-physician partnerships provide patient-centered care at an Iowa practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):966–968.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Nutting P, Crabtree B, Miller W, Stewart E, Stange K, Jaen C. Journey to the patient-centered medical home: a qualitative analysis of the experiences of practices in the national demonstration project. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(supp 1):S45–S56.PubMedCrossRef Nutting P, Crabtree B, Miller W, Stewart E, Stange K, Jaen C. Journey to the patient-centered medical home: a qualitative analysis of the experiences of practices in the national demonstration project. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(supp 1):S45–S56.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Crosson J, Etz R, Wu S, Straus S, Eisenman D, Bell D. Meaningful use of electronic prescribing in 5 exemplar primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(5):392–397.PubMedCrossRef Crosson J, Etz R, Wu S, Straus S, Eisenman D, Bell D. Meaningful use of electronic prescribing in 5 exemplar primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(5):392–397.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Karsh B-T. Clinical practice improvement and redesign: how change in workflow can be supported by clinical decision support. AHRQ Publication 2009;No. 09-0054-EF. Karsh B-T. Clinical practice improvement and redesign: how change in workflow can be supported by clinical decision support. AHRQ Publication 2009;No. 09-0054-EF.
46.
go back to reference Campbell E, Guappone K, Sittig D, Dykstra R, Ash J. Computerized provider order entry adoption: implications for clinical workflow. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;24(1):21–26.PubMedCrossRef Campbell E, Guappone K, Sittig D, Dykstra R, Ash J. Computerized provider order entry adoption: implications for clinical workflow. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;24(1):21–26.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Aarts J, Ash J, Berg M. Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int J Med Informat. 2007;76S:S4–S13.CrossRef Aarts J, Ash J, Berg M. Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int J Med Informat. 2007;76S:S4–S13.CrossRef
48.
49.
go back to reference Ferrer RL, Mody-Bailey P, Jaen CR, Gott S, Araujo S. A medical assistant-based program to promote healthy behaviors in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(6):504–512.PubMedCrossRef Ferrer RL, Mody-Bailey P, Jaen CR, Gott S, Araujo S. A medical assistant-based program to promote healthy behaviors in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(6):504–512.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–641.PubMedCrossRef Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–641.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Morrison I, Smith R. Hamster health care: time to stop running faster and redesign health care. BMJ. 2000;321:1541–1542.PubMedCrossRef Morrison I, Smith R. Hamster health care: time to stop running faster and redesign health care. BMJ. 2000;321:1541–1542.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2004;291(10):1246–1251. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2004;291(10):1246–1251.
53.
go back to reference Carayon P, Hundt A, Karsh B, Gurses A, Alvarado C, Smith M. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(Supp I):i50–i58.PubMedCrossRef Carayon P, Hundt A, Karsh B, Gurses A, Alvarado C, Smith M. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(Supp I):i50–i58.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Lapin J, Beasley J, Smith P, al. e. Proactive risk assessment of primary care of the elderly. ARHQ Conference. Bethesda, MD2008. Lapin J, Beasley J, Smith P, al. e. Proactive risk assessment of primary care of the elderly. ARHQ Conference. Bethesda, MD2008.
Metadata
Title
Electronic Health Record Impact on Work Burden in Small, Unaffiliated, Community-Based Primary Care Practices
Authors
Jenna Howard, PhD
Elizabeth C. Clark, MD, MPH
Asia Friedman, PhD
Jesse C. Crosson, PhD
Maria Pellerano, MA, MBA, MPH
Benjamin F. Crabtree, PhD
Ben-Tzion Karsh, PhD
Carlos R. Jaen, MD, PhD
Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD
Deborah J. Cohen, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2192-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2013 Go to the issue

From the Editors' Desk

Innovation and Inauguration

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.