Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2010

01-12-2010 | Perspectives

Hospital-Based Comparative Effectiveness Centers: Translating Research into Practice to Improve the Quality, Safety and Value of Patient Care

Authors: Craig A. Umscheid, MD, MSCE, Kendal Williams, MD, MPH, Patrick J. Brennan, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 12/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Hospital-based comparative effectiveness (CE) centers provide a model that clinical leaders can use to improve evidence-based practice locally. The model is used by integrated health systems outside the US, but is less recognized in the US. Such centers can identify and adapt national evidence-based policies for the local setting, create local evidence-based policies in the absence of national policies, and implement evidence into practice through health information technology (HIT) and quality initiatives. Given the increasing availability of CE evidence and incentives to meaningfully use HIT, the relevance of this model to US practitioners is increasing. This is especially true in the context of healthcare reform, which will likely reduce reimbursements for care deemed unnecessary by published evidence or guidelines. There are challenges to operating hospital-based CE centers, but many of these challenges can be overcome using solutions developed by those currently leading such centers. In conclusion, these centers have the potential to improve the quality, safety and value of care locally, ultimately translating into higher quality and more cost-effective care nationally. To better understand this potential, the current activity and impact of hospital-based CE centers in the US should be rigorously examined.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gawande A. The Cost Conundrum. The New Yorker. 2009 June 1. Gawande A. The Cost Conundrum. The New Yorker. 2009 June 1.
3.
go back to reference Davis K. Slowing the growth of health care costs–learning from international experience. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1751–5.CrossRefPubMed Davis K. Slowing the growth of health care costs–learning from international experience. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1751–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Clancy CM, Cronin K. Evidence-based decision making: global evidence, local decisions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(1):151–62.CrossRef Clancy CM, Cronin K. Evidence-based decision making: global evidence, local decisions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(1):151–62.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:10. Health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:10.
7.
go back to reference Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress on Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, D.C.; June 2009. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress on Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, D.C.; June 2009.
8.
go back to reference Atkins D, Fink K, Slutsky J. Better information for better health care: the Evidence-based Practice Center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12 Pt 2):1035–41.PubMed Atkins D, Fink K, Slutsky J. Better information for better health care: the Evidence-based Practice Center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12 Pt 2):1035–41.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Slutsky JR, Clancy CM. AHRQ's effective health care program: why comparative effectiveness matters. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(1):67–70.CrossRefPubMed Slutsky JR, Clancy CM. AHRQ's effective health care program: why comparative effectiveness matters. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(1):67–70.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference VanLare JM, Conway PH, Sox HC. Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(11):970–3.CrossRefPubMed VanLare JM, Conway PH, Sox HC. Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(11):970–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mitchell MD, Williams K, Brennan PJ, Umscheid CA. Integrating local data into hospital-based healthcare technology assessment: two case studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(3):294–300.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell MD, Williams K, Brennan PJ, Umscheid CA. Integrating local data into hospital-based healthcare technology assessment: two case studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(3):294–300.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bodeau-Livinec F, Simon E, Montagnier-Petrissans C, Joel ME, Fery-Lemonnier E. Impact of CEDIT recommendations: An example of health technology assessment in a hospital network. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):161–8.CrossRefPubMed Bodeau-Livinec F, Simon E, Montagnier-Petrissans C, Joel ME, Fery-Lemonnier E. Impact of CEDIT recommendations: An example of health technology assessment in a hospital network. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):161–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mayes R. The origins, development, and passage of Medicare's revolutionary prospective payment system. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2007;62(1):21–55.CrossRefPubMed Mayes R. The origins, development, and passage of Medicare's revolutionary prospective payment system. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2007;62(1):21–55.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Luce BR, Brown RE. The use of technology assessment by hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and third-party payers in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995;11(1):79–92.CrossRefPubMed Luce BR, Brown RE. The use of technology assessment by hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and third-party payers in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995;11(1):79–92.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Weingart SN, Weingart SN. Acquiring advanced technology. Decision-making strategies at twelve medical centers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993;9(4):530–8.CrossRefPubMed Weingart SN, Weingart SN. Acquiring advanced technology. Decision-making strategies at twelve medical centers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993;9(4):530–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mitchell MD, Anderson B, Williams K, Umscheid CA. Systematic review of heparin flushing and other interventions to maintain patency of central venous access devices. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(10):2007–21.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell MD, Anderson B, Williams K, Umscheid CA. Systematic review of heparin flushing and other interventions to maintain patency of central venous access devices. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(10):2007–21.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stetler C, Mittman B, Francis J. Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:8.CrossRefPubMed Stetler C, Mittman B, Francis J. Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dougherty D, Conway PH. The "3T's" Road Map to Transform US Health Care: The "How" of High-Quality Care. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299(19):2319–21.CrossRef Dougherty D, Conway PH. The "3T's" Road Map to Transform US Health Care: The "How" of High-Quality Care. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299(19):2319–21.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Conway PH, Clancy C. Charting a Path From Comparative Effectiveness Funding to Improved Patient-Centered Health Care. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(10):985–6.CrossRef Conway PH, Clancy C. Charting a Path From Comparative Effectiveness Funding to Improved Patient-Centered Health Care. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(10):985–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hospital-Based Comparative Effectiveness Centers: Translating Research into Practice to Improve the Quality, Safety and Value of Patient Care
Authors
Craig A. Umscheid, MD, MSCE
Kendal Williams, MD, MPH
Patrick J. Brennan, MD
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 12/2010
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1476-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2010

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2010 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.