Published in:
01-07-2009 | Letter to the Editor
PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 in Western Kenya
Authors:
James C. Coyne, PhD, Brett D. Thombs, PhD, Alex J. Mitchell, MSc, MRCPsych
Published in:
Journal of General Internal Medicine
|
Issue 7/2009
Login to get access
Excerpt
To the Editors:—Recently, Monahan et al. concluded that the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 were “valid/reliable for assessing DSM-IV depressive disorders and depression severity among adults living with HIV/AIDS in Western Kenya”
1. However, they did not actually use any accepted assessment tool to diagnose DSM-IV depressive disorders. Instead, they used a “diagnosis” of depression based on the self-report PHQ-9 as their criterion standard. A recent meta-analysis
2 found that the PHQ-9 was acceptable for depression screening, but it was not superior to results from other depression screening tools in identifying cases of depression,
3 and it was poorly sensitive in some patient groups
2. Based on the authors use of the PHQ-9 as a diagnostic criterion, one might conclude that any depression questionnaire could appropriately be substituted for a gold standard structured interview. This is clearly not the case, and the PHQ-9 is not appropriate for that purpose either. …