Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2007

01-12-2007 | Original Article

Beyond Comorbidity Counts: How Do Comorbidity Type and Severity Influence Diabetes Patients’ Treatment Priorities and Self-Management?

Authors: Eve A. Kerr, MD, MPH, Michele Heisler, MD, MPA, Sarah L. Krein, PhD, RN, Mohammed Kabeto, MS, Kenneth M. Langa, MD, PhD, David Weir, PhD, John D. Piette, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The majority of older adults have 2 or more chronic conditions and among patients with diabetes, 40% have at least three.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to understand how the number, type, and severity of comorbidities influence diabetes patients’ self-management and treatment priorities.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observation study.

PATIENTS

A total of 1,901 diabetes patients who responded to the 2003 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) diabetes survey.

MEASUREMENTS

We constructed multivariate models to assess the association between presence of comorbidities and each of 2 self-reported outcomes, diabetes prioritization and self-management ability, controlling for patient demographics. Comorbidity was characterized first by a count of all comorbid conditions, then by the presence of specific comorbidity subtypes (microvascular, macrovascular, and non-diabetes related), and finally by severity of 1 serious comorbidity: heart failure (HF).

RESULTS

40% of respondents had at least 1 microvascular comorbidity, 79% at least 1 macrovascular comorbidity, and 61% at least 1 non-diabetes-related comorbidity. Patients with a greater overall number of comorbidities placed lower priority on diabetes and had worse diabetes self-management ability scores. However, only macrovascular and non-diabetes-related comorbidities, but not microvascular comorbidities, were associated with lower diabetes prioritization, whereas higher numbers of microvascular, macrovascular, and non-diabetes-related conditions were all associated with lower diabetes self-management ability scores. Severe, but not mild, HF was associated with lower diabetes prioritization and self-management scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The type and severity of comorbid conditions, and not just the comorbidity count, influence diabetes patients’ self-management. Patients with severely symptomatic comorbidities and those with conditions they consider to be unrelated to diabetes may need additional support in making decisions about care priorities and self-management activities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002;162(20):2269–76.PubMedCrossRef Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002;162(20):2269–76.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Russell LB, Suh DC, Safford MA. Time requirements for diabetes self-management: too much for many? J Fam Pract 2005;54(1):52–6.PubMed Russell LB, Suh DC, Safford MA. Time requirements for diabetes self-management: too much for many? J Fam Pract 2005;54(1):52–6.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Druss BG, Marcus SC, Olfson M, Tanielian T, Elinson L, Pincus HA. Comparing the national economic burden of five chronic conditions. Health Aff 2001;20(6):233–41.CrossRef Druss BG, Marcus SC, Olfson M, Tanielian T, Elinson L, Pincus HA. Comparing the national economic burden of five chronic conditions. Health Aff 2001;20(6):233–41.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tinetti ME, Bogardus ST Jr, Agostini JV. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. New Engl J Med 2004;351(27):2870–4.PubMedCrossRef Tinetti ME, Bogardus ST Jr, Agostini JV. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. New Engl J Med 2004;351(27):2870–4.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 2005;294(6):716–24.PubMedCrossRef Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 2005;294(6):716–24.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Glasgow R, Toobert DJ, Gilette CD. Psychosocial barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diabetes Spectr 2001;14:33–41.CrossRef Glasgow R, Toobert DJ, Gilette CD. Psychosocial barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diabetes Spectr 2001;14:33–41.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Hampson SE, Strycker LA, Ruggiero L. Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental barriers related to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Care 1997;20(4):556–61.PubMedCrossRef Glasgow RE, Hampson SE, Strycker LA, Ruggiero L. Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental barriers related to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Care 1997;20(4):556–61.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Heisler M, Bouknight RR, Hayward RA, Smith DM, Kerr EA. Diabetes self-management: the relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision-making and patient understanding. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17(4):243–52.PubMedCrossRef Heisler M, Bouknight RR, Hayward RA, Smith DM, Kerr EA. Diabetes self-management: the relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision-making and patient understanding. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17(4):243–52.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heisler M, Smith DM, Hayward RA, Krein SL, Kerr EA. How well do patients’ assessments of their diabetes self-management correlate with actual glycemic control and receipt of recommended diabetes services? Diabetes Care 2003;26(3):738–43.PubMedCrossRef Heisler M, Smith DM, Hayward RA, Krein SL, Kerr EA. How well do patients’ assessments of their diabetes self-management correlate with actual glycemic control and receipt of recommended diabetes services? Diabetes Care 2003;26(3):738–43.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bayliss EA, Steiner JF, Fernald DH, Crane LA, Main DS. Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases. Ann Fam Med 2003;1(1):15–21.CrossRef Bayliss EA, Steiner JF, Fernald DH, Crane LA, Main DS. Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases. Ann Fam Med 2003;1(1):15–21.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Piette JD, Kerr EA. The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care 2006;29(3):725–31.PubMedCrossRef Piette JD, Kerr EA. The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care 2006;29(3):725–31.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(5):1218–24.PubMedCrossRef Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(5):1218–24.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care 2004;42(3):200–9.PubMedCrossRef DiMatteo MR. Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research. Med Care 2004;42(3):200–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rubin RR. Adherence to pharmacologic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2005;118 Suppl 5A:27S–34S.PubMedCrossRef Rubin RR. Adherence to pharmacologic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2005;118 Suppl 5A:27S–34S.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care 2005;43(6):521–30.PubMedCrossRef Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care 2005;43(6):521–30.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MI: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MI: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
17.
go back to reference Krein SL, Heisler M, Piette JD, Makki F, Kerr EA. The effect of chronic pain on diabetes patients’ self-management. Diabetes Care 2005;28(1):65–70.PubMedCrossRef Krein SL, Heisler M, Piette JD, Makki F, Kerr EA. The effect of chronic pain on diabetes patients’ self-management. Diabetes Care 2005;28(1):65–70.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schoenberg NE, Drungle SC. Barriers to non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) self-care practices among older women. J Aging Health 2001;13(4):443–66.PubMedCrossRef Schoenberg NE, Drungle SC. Barriers to non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) self-care practices among older women. J Aging Health 2001;13(4):443–66.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract 1994;38(2):166–71.PubMed Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract 1994;38(2):166–71.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Chernof BA, Sherman SE, Lanto AB, Lee ML, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV. Health habit counseling amidst competing demands: effects of patient health habits and visit characteristics. Med Care 1999;37(8):738–47.PubMedCrossRef Chernof BA, Sherman SE, Lanto AB, Lee ML, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV. Health habit counseling amidst competing demands: effects of patient health habits and visit characteristics. Med Care 1999;37(8):738–47.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45(6):613–9.PubMedCrossRef Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45(6):613–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40(5):373–83.PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40(5):373–83.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. New Engl J Med 1998;338(21):1516–20.PubMedCrossRef Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. New Engl J Med 1998;338(21):1516–20.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Juster FT, Suzman R. SR. An overview of the health retirement study. J Hum Resour 1995;30:S7–S56.CrossRef Juster FT, Suzman R. SR. An overview of the health retirement study. J Hum Resour 1995;30:S7–S56.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
26.
go back to reference Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation in health-promoting behavior. In: Madden J, Matthysse S, Barchas J, eds. Adaptation, Learning, and Affect. New York: Raven Press; 1991, 226–69. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation in health-promoting behavior. In: Madden J, Matthysse S, Barchas J, eds. Adaptation, Learning, and Affect. New York: Raven Press; 1991, 226–69.
27.
go back to reference Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care 1998;21(10):1644–51.PubMedCrossRef Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care 1998;21(10):1644–51.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE. Depression and diabetes: impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(21):3278–85.PubMedCrossRef Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE. Depression and diabetes: impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(21):3278–85.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dixon LB, Kreyenbuhl JA, Dickerson FB, et al. A comparison of type 2 diabetes outcomes among persons with and without severe mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv 2004;55(8):892–900.PubMedCrossRef Dixon LB, Kreyenbuhl JA, Dickerson FB, et al. A comparison of type 2 diabetes outcomes among persons with and without severe mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv 2004;55(8):892–900.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rigler SK, Studenski S, Wallace D, Reker DM, Duncan PW. Co-morbidity adjustment for functional outcomes in community-dwelling older adults. Clin Rehabil 2002;16(4):420–8.CrossRef Rigler SK, Studenski S, Wallace D, Reker DM, Duncan PW. Co-morbidity adjustment for functional outcomes in community-dwelling older adults. Clin Rehabil 2002;16(4):420–8.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vijan S, Hayward RA. Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus: blood pressure goals, choice of agents, and setting priorities in diabetes care. Ann Intern Med 2003;138(7):593–602.PubMed Vijan S, Hayward RA. Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus: blood pressure goals, choice of agents, and setting priorities in diabetes care. Ann Intern Med 2003;138(7):593–602.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Hofer TP, Zemencuk JK, Hayward RA. When there is too much to do: how practicing physicians prioritize among recommended interventions. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19(6):646–53.PubMedCrossRef Hofer TP, Zemencuk JK, Hayward RA. When there is too much to do: how practicing physicians prioritize among recommended interventions. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19(6):646–53.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Fisher G, Faul J, Weir DR, Wallace RB. HRS/AHEAD documentation report: documentation of chronic disease measures in the health and retirement study. Fisher G, Faul J, Weir DR, Wallace RB. HRS/AHEAD documentation report: documentation of chronic disease measures in the health and retirement study.
34.
go back to reference Granata AV, Hillman AL. Competing practice guidelines: using cost-effectiveness analysis to make optimal decisions. Ann Intern Med 1998;128(1):56–63.PubMed Granata AV, Hillman AL. Competing practice guidelines: using cost-effectiveness analysis to make optimal decisions. Ann Intern Med 1998;128(1):56–63.PubMed
35.
go back to reference American College of Physicians. The Advanced Medical Home: A Patient-Centered, Physician-Guided Model of Health Care. A Policy Monograph, 2006. American College of Physicians. The Advanced Medical Home: A Patient-Centered, Physician-Guided Model of Health Care. A Policy Monograph, 2006.
Metadata
Title
Beyond Comorbidity Counts: How Do Comorbidity Type and Severity Influence Diabetes Patients’ Treatment Priorities and Self-Management?
Authors
Eve A. Kerr, MD, MPH
Michele Heisler, MD, MPA
Sarah L. Krein, PhD, RN
Mohammed Kabeto, MS
Kenneth M. Langa, MD, PhD
David Weir, PhD
John D. Piette, PhD
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0313-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.