Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Original Article

Computers in the Exam Room: Differences in Physician–Patient Interaction May Be Due to Physician Experience

Authors: Emran Rouf, MD, Jeff Whittle, MD, PhD, Na Lu, PhD, Mark D. Schwartz, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Background

The use of electronic medical records can improve the technical quality of care, but requires a computer in the exam room. This could adversely affect interpersonal aspects of care, particularly when physicians are inexperienced users of exam room computers.

Objective

To determine whether physician experience modifies the impact of exam room computers on the physician–patient interaction.

Design

Cross-sectional surveys of patients and physicians.

Setting and Participants

One hundred fifty five adults seen for scheduled visits by 11 faculty internists and 12 internal medicine residents in a VA primary care clinic.

Measurements

Physician and patient assessment of the effect of the computer on the clinical encounter.

Main Results

Patients seeing residents, compared to those seeing faculty, were more likely to agree that the computer adversely affected the amount of time the physician spent talking to (34% vs 15%, P = 0.01), looking at (45% vs 24%, P = 0.02), and examining them (32% vs 13%, P = 0.009). Moreover, they were more likely to agree that the computer made the visit feel less personal (20% vs 5%, P = 0.017). Few patients thought the computer interfered with their relationship with their physicians (8% vs 8%). Residents were more likely than faculty to report these same adverse effects, but these differences were smaller and not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Patients seen by residents more often agreed that exam room computers decreased the amount of interpersonal contact. More research is needed to elucidate key tasks and behaviors that facilitate doctor–patient communication in such a setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Inui TS, Carter WB. Problems and prospects for health services research on provider–patient communication. Med Care. 1985;23(5): 521–38.PubMedCrossRef Inui TS, Carter WB. Problems and prospects for health services research on provider–patient communication. Med Care. 1985;23(5): 521–38.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stewart MA. Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.PubMed Stewart MA. Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Hall JA, Horgan TJ, Stein TS, Roter DL. Liking in the physician–patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Sep;48(1):69–77.PubMedCrossRef Hall JA, Horgan TJ, Stein TS, Roter DL. Liking in the physician–patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Sep;48(1):69–77.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE, J. Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care.1989;27:S110–S127.PubMedCrossRef Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE, J. Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care.1989;27:S110–S127.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schneider J, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Li W, Wilson IB. Better physician–patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Nov;19(11):1096–103.PubMedCrossRef Schneider J, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Li W, Wilson IB. Better physician–patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Nov;19(11):1096–103.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Relations between physicians’ behaviors and analogue patients’ satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care.1987;25:437–51.PubMedCrossRef Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Relations between physicians’ behaviors and analogue patients’ satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care.1987;25:437–51.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor–patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(12):1365–70.PubMedCrossRef Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor–patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(12):1365–70.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lester GW, Smith SG. Listening and talking to patients. A remedy for malpractice suits? West J Med. 1993;158:268–72PubMed Lester GW, Smith SG. Listening and talking to patients. A remedy for malpractice suits? West J Med. 1993;158:268–72PubMed
9.
go back to reference Blendon RJ, Schoen C, Desroches C, Osborn R, Zapert K. Common concerns amid diverse systems: health care experiences in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May–Jun;22(3):106–21.CrossRef Blendon RJ, Schoen C, Desroches C, Osborn R, Zapert K. Common concerns amid diverse systems: health care experiences in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May–Jun;22(3):106–21.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Woolf SH, Kuzel AJ, Dovey SM, Philips RL, Jr. A String of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors. Ann Fam Med. 2004 Jul–Aug;2(4):292–93CrossRef Woolf SH, Kuzel AJ, Dovey SM, Philips RL, Jr. A String of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors. Ann Fam Med. 2004 Jul–Aug;2(4):292–93CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware, JE, Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Apr;102(4): 520–28.PubMed Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware, JE, Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Apr;102(4): 520–28.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hulka BS, Cassel JC, Kupper LL, Burdette JA. Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications. Am J Public Health. 1976;66:847–53.PubMedCrossRef Hulka BS, Cassel JC, Kupper LL, Burdette JA. Communication, compliance, and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications. Am J Public Health. 1976;66:847–53.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Jul–Aug 1999;6(4):313–21.PubMed Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Jul–Aug 1999;6(4):313–21.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Versel, N. One in five group practices now use EHRs. Health IT World News Newsletter 2. 1-25-2005. Health-IT World. 11-15-2005 Versel, N. One in five group practices now use EHRs. Health IT World News Newsletter 2. 1-25-2005. Health-IT World. 11-15-2005
15.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine, Committee on improving the patient record. The computer-based patient record: An essential technology for health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997. Institute of Medicine, Committee on improving the patient record. The computer-based patient record: An essential technology for health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.
16.
go back to reference Rollman BL, Hanusa BH, Lowe HJ, Gilbert T, Kapoor WN, Schulberg HC. A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve treatment of major depression in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17:493–503.PubMedCrossRef Rollman BL, Hanusa BH, Lowe HJ, Gilbert T, Kapoor WN, Schulberg HC. A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve treatment of major depression in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17:493–503.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409–16.PubMedCrossRef Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409–16.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998;280:1339–46.PubMedCrossRef Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998;280:1339–46.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Roter DL, Frankel RM, Hall JA, Sluyter D. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. Mechanisms and Outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21(Suppl 1):S28–S34.PubMedCrossRef Roter DL, Frankel RM, Hall JA, Sluyter D. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. Mechanisms and Outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21(Suppl 1):S28–S34.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Waitzkin H. Doctor–patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. JAMA. 1984 Nov 2;252(17):2441–46.PubMedCrossRef Waitzkin H. Doctor–patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. JAMA. 1984 Nov 2;252(17):2441–46.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980–97. BMJ. 2001;322:279–82.PubMedCrossRef Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980–97. BMJ. 2001;322:279–82.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Frankel R, Altschuler A, George S, et al. Effects of exam-room computing on clinician–patient communication: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:677–82.PubMedCrossRef Frankel R, Altschuler A, George S, et al. Effects of exam-room computing on clinician–patient communication: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:677–82.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rubin HR, Gadnek B, Rogers WH, Kosinsky M. Patients’ ratings of outpatients visits in different practice settings: results from the Medical Outcome Study. JAMA. 1993:270:835–40.CrossRef Rubin HR, Gadnek B, Rogers WH, Kosinsky M. Patients’ ratings of outpatients visits in different practice settings: results from the Medical Outcome Study. JAMA. 1993:270:835–40.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.CrossRef Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Makoul G, Curry RH, Tang PC. The use of electronic medical records: communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:610–5.PubMed Makoul G, Curry RH, Tang PC. The use of electronic medical records: communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:610–5.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Ridsdale L, Hudd S. Computers in the consultation: the patient’s view. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:367–9.PubMed Ridsdale L, Hudd S. Computers in the consultation: the patient’s view. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:367–9.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Solomon GL, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room? J Fam Pract. 1995;41:241–4.PubMed Solomon GL, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room? J Fam Pract. 1995;41:241–4.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Ornstein S, Bearden A. Patient perspectives on computer-based medical records. J Fam Pract. 1994;38:606–10.PubMed Ornstein S, Bearden A. Patient perspectives on computer-based medical records. J Fam Pract. 1994;38:606–10.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians’ and patients’ attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000;275–9. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians’ and patients’ attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000;275–9.
30.
go back to reference Legler JD, Oates R. Patients’ reactions to physician use of a computerized medical record system during clinical encounters. J Fam Pract. 1993;37:241–4.PubMed Legler JD, Oates R. Patients’ reactions to physician use of a computerized medical record system during clinical encounters. J Fam Pract. 1993;37:241–4.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Aydin CE, Rosen PN, Jewell SM, Felitti VJ. Computers in the examining room: the patient’s perspective. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995;824–8. Aydin CE, Rosen PN, Jewell SM, Felitti VJ. Computers in the examining room: the patient’s perspective. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995;824–8.
32.
go back to reference Herzmark G, Brownbridge G, Fitter M, Evans A. Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984;34:649–54.PubMed Herzmark G, Brownbridge G, Fitter M, Evans A. Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984;34:649–54.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Warshawsky SS, Pliskin JS, Urkin J, et al. Physician use of a computerized medical record system during the patient encounter: a descriptive study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1994;43:269–73.PubMedCrossRef Warshawsky SS, Pliskin JS, Urkin J, et al. Physician use of a computerized medical record system during the patient encounter: a descriptive study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1994;43:269–73.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Als AB. The desktop computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desktop computer; GPs’ and patients’ perceptions. Fam Pract. 1997;14:17–23.PubMedCrossRef Als AB. The desktop computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desktop computer; GPs’ and patients’ perceptions. Fam Pract. 1997;14:17–23.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rowe BH, Ryan DT, Therrien S, Mulloy JV. First-year family medicine residents’ use of computers: knowledge, skills and attitudes. CMAJ. 1995;153:267–72.PubMed Rowe BH, Ryan DT, Therrien S, Mulloy JV. First-year family medicine residents’ use of computers: knowledge, skills and attitudes. CMAJ. 1995;153:267–72.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Aaronson JW, Murphy-Cullen CL, Chop WM, Frey RD. Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective. Fam Med. 2001; 33:128–32.PubMed Aaronson JW, Murphy-Cullen CL, Chop WM, Frey RD. Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective. Fam Med. 2001; 33:128–32.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Embi PJ, Yackel TR, Logan JR, Bowen JL, Cooney TG, Gorman PN. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:300–9.PubMedCrossRef Embi PJ, Yackel TR, Logan JR, Bowen JL, Cooney TG, Gorman PN. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:300–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computers in the Exam Room: Differences in Physician–Patient Interaction May Be Due to Physician Experience
Authors
Emran Rouf, MD
Jeff Whittle, MD, PhD
Na Lu, PhD
Mark D. Schwartz, MD
Publication date
01-01-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0112-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.