Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2010

01-06-2010 | SSAT Poster Presentation

Optimal Technical Management of Stump Closure Following Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Review of 215 Cases

Authors: Lisa J. Harris, Hamid Abdollahi, Timothy Newhook, Patricia K. Sauter, Albert G. Crawford, Karen A. Chojnacki, Ernest L. Rosato, Eugene P. Kennedy, Charles J. Yeo, Adam C. Berger

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a major source of morbidity following distal pancreatectomy (DP). Our aim was to identify risk factors related to PF following DP and to determine the impact of technique of transection and stump closure.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 215 consecutive patients who underwent DP. Perioperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed with attention to PF as defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula.

Results

PF developed in 36 patients (16.7%); fistulas were classified as Grade A (44.4%), B (44.4%), or C (11.1%). The pancreas was transected with stapler (n = 139), cautery (n = 70), and scalpel (n = 3). PF developed in 19.8% of remnants which were stapled/oversewn and 27.7% that were stapled alone (p = 0.4). Of the 69 pancreatic remnants transected with cautery and oversewn, a fistula developed in 4.3% (p = 0.004 compared to stapled/oversewn; p = 0.006 compared to stapled/not sewn). The median length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly increased in patients who developed PF (10 vs. 6 days, p = 0.002)

Conclusion

The method of transection and management of the pancreatic remnant plays a critical role in the formation of PF following DP. This series suggests that transection using electrocautery followed by oversewing of the pancreatic remnant has the lowest risk of PF.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S, et al. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 1997;84:1370-1376.CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S, et al. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 1997;84:1370-1376.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003;138:1310-1314.CrossRefPubMed Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003;138:1310-1314.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2002;183:237-241.CrossRefPubMed Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 2002;183:237-241.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Grobmeyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, et al. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:356-364.CrossRef Grobmeyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, et al. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:356-364.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005;242:781-788.CrossRefPubMed van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005;242:781-788.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 1999;229:693-700.CrossRefPubMed Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 1999;229:693-700.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fabre JM, Houry S, Manderscheid JC, et al. Surgery for left-sided pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1065-1070.CrossRefPubMed Fabre JM, Houry S, Manderscheid JC, et al. Surgery for left-sided pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:1065-1070.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bilimoria MM, Cormier JN, Mun Y, et al. Pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation. Br J Surg 2003;90:190-196.CrossRefPubMed Bilimoria MM, Cormier JN, Mun Y, et al. Pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation. Br J Surg 2003;90:190-196.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 2007;245:573-582.CrossRefPubMed Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 2007;245:573-582.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Balcom JH IV, Rattner DW, Warshaw Al, et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001;136:391-398.CrossRefPubMed Balcom JH IV, Rattner DW, Warshaw Al, et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 2001;136:391-398.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rodriguez JR, Germes SS, Pandharipande PV, et al. Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection. Arch Surg 2006;141:361-365.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez JR, Germes SS, Pandharipande PV, et al. Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection. Arch Surg 2006;141:361-365.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ridolfini MP, Alferi S, Gourgiotis S, et al. Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial? World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:5096-5100.PubMed Ridolfini MP, Alferi S, Gourgiotis S, et al. Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial? World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:5096-5100.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Sheehan MK, Beck K, Creech S, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation? Am Surg 2002;68:264-267.PubMed Sheehan MK, Beck K, Creech S, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation? Am Surg 2002;68:264-267.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bassi C, Butturini G, Falconi M, et al. Prospective randomized pilot study of management of the pancreatic stump following distal resection. HPB 1999;1:203-207. Bassi C, Butturini G, Falconi M, et al. Prospective randomized pilot study of management of the pancreatic stump following distal resection. HPB 1999;1:203-207.
15.
go back to reference Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki T, Ando T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? Aust N Z J Surg 2003;73:922-925.CrossRef Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki T, Ando T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? Aust N Z J Surg 2003;73:922-925.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg 1999;86:608-611.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg 1999;86:608-611.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y, et al. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg 1998;22:494-498.CrossRefPubMed Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y, et al. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg 1998;22:494-498.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Kanematsu T. Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005;12:283-285.CrossRefPubMed Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Kanematsu T. Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2005;12:283-285.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kawai M, Tani M, Yamaue H. Transection using bipolar scissors reduced pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2008;15:366-372.CrossRefPubMed Kawai M, Tani M, Yamaue H. Transection using bipolar scissors reduced pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2008;15:366-372.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jimez R, Mavanur A, Macaulay W. Staple line reinforcement reduced postoperative pancreatic stump leak after distal pancreatectomy. J Gastroint Surg 2007;11:345-349.CrossRef Jimez R, Mavanur A, Macaulay W. Staple line reinforcement reduced postoperative pancreatic stump leak after distal pancreatectomy. J Gastroint Surg 2007;11:345-349.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ferrone C, Warshaw A, Rattner D, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1691-1698.CrossRefPubMed Ferrone C, Warshaw A, Rattner D, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1691-1698.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8-13.CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8-13.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection: the importance of definitions. Dig Surg 2004;21:54-59.CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection: the importance of definitions. Dig Surg 2004;21:54-59.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Goh B, Ten Y, Chung YA, et al. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula. Arch Surg 2008;143:956-965.CrossRefPubMed Goh B, Ten Y, Chung YA, et al. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula. Arch Surg 2008;143:956-965.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bilimoria MM, Evans DB, Lee JE, et al. Pancreatic closure after distal pancreatectomy: relationship to postoperative pancreatic fistula. Presented at the 53rd Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New Orleans, LA, March 16-19, 2000. Bilimoria MM, Evans DB, Lee JE, et al. Pancreatic closure after distal pancreatectomy: relationship to postoperative pancreatic fistula. Presented at the 53rd Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New Orleans, LA, March 16-19, 2000.
26.
go back to reference Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, et al. Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg 2006;141:1071-1076.CrossRefPubMed Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, et al. Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg 2006;141:1071-1076.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Büchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, et al. Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg 1992;163:125–131.CrossRefPubMed Büchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, et al. Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg 1992;163:125–131.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Falconi M, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of complications of elective pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 1994;81:265–269.CrossRefPubMed Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Falconi M, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of complications of elective pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 1994;81:265–269.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Montorsi M, Zago M, Mosca F, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Surgery 1995;117:26–31.CrossRefPubMed Montorsi M, Zago M, Mosca F, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Surgery 1995;117:26–31.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Friess H, Beger HG, Sulkowski U, et al. Randomized controlled multicentre study of the prevention of complications by octreotide in patients undergoing surgery for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1995;82:1270–1273.CrossRefPubMed Friess H, Beger HG, Sulkowski U, et al. Randomized controlled multicentre study of the prevention of complications by octreotide in patients undergoing surgery for chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1995;82:1270–1273.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lowy AM, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, et al. Prospective randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 1997;226:632–641.CrossRefPubMed Lowy AM, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, et al. Prospective randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 1997;226:632–641.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy?: Results of a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000;232:419-429.CrossRefPubMed Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy?: Results of a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000;232:419-429.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Tang CN, Tsui KK, Ha JP, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:265-271.PubMed Tang CN, Tsui KK, Ha JP, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:265-271.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Hawkins WG, et al. Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2007;21:579-586.CrossRefPubMed Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Hawkins WG, et al. Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2007;21:579-586.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Pryor A, Means JR, Pappas TN. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. Surg Endosc 2007;21:2326-2330.CrossRefPubMed Pryor A, Means JR, Pappas TN. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. Surg Endosc 2007;21:2326-2330.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Abu Hilal M, Jain G, Kasasbeh F, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: critical analysis of preliminary experience from a tertiary referral centre. Surg Endosc 2009; doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0499-y. Abu Hilal M, Jain G, Kasasbeh F, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: critical analysis of preliminary experience from a tertiary referral centre. Surg Endosc 2009; doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0499-y.
37.
go back to reference Patterson EJ, Gagner M, Salky B, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: single-institution experience of 19 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:281-287.CrossRefPubMed Patterson EJ, Gagner M, Salky B, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: single-institution experience of 19 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:281-287.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Velanovich V. Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:95-98.CrossRefPubMed Velanovich V. Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:95-98.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 2008;248:438-446.PubMed Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 2008;248:438-446.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Optimal Technical Management of Stump Closure Following Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Review of 215 Cases
Authors
Lisa J. Harris
Hamid Abdollahi
Timothy Newhook
Patricia K. Sauter
Albert G. Crawford
Karen A. Chojnacki
Ernest L. Rosato
Eugene P. Kennedy
Charles J. Yeo
Adam C. Berger
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1185-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2010 Go to the issue