Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2007

01-12-2007 | Technique

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation

Authors: A. Pryor, J. R. Means, T. N. Pappas

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The technique of distal pancreatectomy has been well described, both with en bloc resection of the spleen and with splenic preservation. Splenic preservation during pancreatic tail resection is desirable when oncologically appropriate, yet it is technically challenging, particularly with laparoscopic approaches. Skeletonization of the splenic artery and vein is associated with longer operative times and greater potential for bleeding. The authors report their experience with splenic preservation during laparoscopic pancreatic resection using ligation of the splenic vessels and preservation of the short gastric vessels.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic pancreatic resection at Duke University Medical Center from July 2002 to October 2005. Charts were analyzed for demographic information, length of hospital stay, conversion, splenic preservation, and postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 12 laparoscopic distal pancreatic resections were attempted for three men and nine women with a mean age was 55.8 years (range, 33–74 years). All 12 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy, 8 with splenic preservation. The spleen was removed from three patients using splenic hilar lesions that prevented splenic salvage. One patient required splenectomy secondary to more than 50% ischemia of the spleen. No patients with preoperatively diagnosed malignancy underwent splenic salvage. The final pathologic diagnosis included neuroendocrine tumors (n = 2), cystic serous (n = 4) and mucinous (n = 2) neoplasms, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) (n = 1), pancreatitis (n = 2), and adenocarcinoma (n = 1). Two patients underwent conversion to open surgery for thickened parenchyma secondary to chronic pancreatitis (17%). There were no other conversions. There were three chemical leaks (25%) diagnosed by elevated drain amylase and low volume output, which were managed with intraoperatively placed drains removed at the initial postoperative clinic visit. There were three higher volume leaks (25%) that required extended or percutaneous drainage, with eventual removal. The average blood loss was 215 ml (range, 50–700 ml). The average operative time was 3 h and 41 min (range, 2 h 15 min to 5 h 58 min). The average length of hospital stay was 4 days (range, 2–7 days).

Conclusion

Splenic preservation should be performed when technically possible to decrease the morbidity of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The choice to ligate the splenic vessels allows for shorter operative times with minimal perioperative morbidity and blood loss while maintaining the spleen.
Literature
1.
go back to reference de Buys Roessingh AS, deLagausie P (2002) Follow-up of Partial Splenectomy on Children with Hereditary Spherocytosis. J Ped Surg 37:1459–1463CrossRef de Buys Roessingh AS, deLagausie P (2002) Follow-up of Partial Splenectomy on Children with Hereditary Spherocytosis. J Ped Surg 37:1459–1463CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120:1051–1054CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120:1051–1054CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hanly EJ, Mendoza-Sagaon JM (2004) New tools for laparoscopic division of the pancreas: A comparative animal study. Surg Laparos Endosc Percutan Tech 14:53–60CrossRef Hanly EJ, Mendoza-Sagaon JM (2004) New tools for laparoscopic division of the pancreas: A comparative animal study. Surg Laparos Endosc Percutan Tech 14:53–60CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Killeen KL, Shanmuganathan K (2001) CT findings after embolization for blunt splenic trauma. J Vasc Inter Radiol 12:209–214CrossRef Killeen KL, Shanmuganathan K (2001) CT findings after embolization for blunt splenic trauma. J Vasc Inter Radiol 12:209–214CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lillemoe K, Cameron JL (2004) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointestin Surg 8:766–774CrossRef Lillemoe K, Cameron JL (2004) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointestin Surg 8:766–774CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Liu P, Lee W (2004) Use of splenic artery embolization as an adjunct to nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury. J Trauma 56:768–773CrossRefPubMed Liu P, Lee W (2004) Use of splenic artery embolization as an adjunct to nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury. J Trauma 56:768–773CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lukish Jr, Rothstein JH (1999) Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy for cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Am Surg 65: 596–599 Lukish Jr, Rothstein JH (1999) Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy for cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Am Surg 65: 596–599
8.
go back to reference Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605CrossRefPubMed Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pandey SK, Bhattacharya S (2004) Anatomical variations of the splenic artery and its clinical implications. Clin Anat 17:497–502CrossRefPubMed Pandey SK, Bhattacharya S (2004) Anatomical variations of the splenic artery and its clinical implications. Clin Anat 17:497–502CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Patterson EJ, Gagner M (2001) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: single-institution experience of 19 patients. J Am Coll Surg 193:281–287CrossRefPubMed Patterson EJ, Gagner M (2001) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: single-institution experience of 19 patients. J Am Coll Surg 193:281–287CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference SatoY, Shimoda S (2000) Evaluation of splenic circulation after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by dividing the splenic artery and vein. Dig Surg 17:519–522CrossRefPubMed SatoY, Shimoda S (2000) Evaluation of splenic circulation after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy by dividing the splenic artery and vein. Dig Surg 17:519–522CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schwalke MA, Crowley JP (1991) Splenic artery ligation for splenic salvage: clinical experience and immune function. J Trauma 31:385–388CrossRefPubMed Schwalke MA, Crowley JP (1991) Splenic artery ligation for splenic salvage: clinical experience and immune function. J Trauma 31:385–388CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shoupe M, Brennan MF (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137:164–168CrossRef Shoupe M, Brennan MF (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137:164–168CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Warshaw AL (1988) Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 123:550–553PubMed Warshaw AL (1988) Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 123:550–553PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation
Authors
A. Pryor
J. R. Means
T. N. Pappas
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9403-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2007 Go to the issue